%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR074+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 70 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 25 ~; 21 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query124,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query124) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( genlmt(X20,X21)
& mtvisible(X20) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_63,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_63) ).
fof(ax1_933,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X19] :
( ( inregion(X14,X19)
& inregion(X13,X14) )
=> inregion(X13,X19) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_933) ).
fof(ax1_128,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)
=> inregion(X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_128) ).
fof(ax1_472,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_472) ).
fof(ax1_478,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_478) ).
fof(ax1_326,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_326) ).
fof(ax1_82,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_82) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query124]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X34,X35] :
( mtvisible(X35)
| ~ genlmt(X34,X35)
| ~ mtvisible(X34) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) )
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_63]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X30,X31,X32] :
( inregion(X30,X32)
| ~ inregion(X31,X32)
| ~ inregion(X30,X31) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_933])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X24,X25] :
( inregion(X25,X24)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X24,X25) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_128])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_472])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_478])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_326]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ inregion(X2,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X2)
| inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| inregion(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_82])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X3)
| inregion(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
| inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR074+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:46:32 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % sh5l with pid 3754501 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.19/0.49 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.49 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3754506 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.19/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.19/0.49 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.49 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.19/0.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1052
% 0.19/0.49 % Initial clauses : 81
% 0.19/0.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 81
% 0.19/0.49 % Processed clauses : 408
% 0.19/0.49 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.19/0.49 % ...subsumed : 117
% 0.19/0.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 287
% 0.19/0.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.19/0.49 % Generated clauses : 550
% 0.19/0.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 441
% 0.19/0.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Paramodulations : 550
% 0.19/0.49 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Total rewrite steps : 81
% 0.19/0.49 % ...of those cached : 50
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 279
% 0.19/0.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 73
% 0.19/0.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 202
% 0.19/0.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 104
% 0.19/0.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 320
% 0.19/0.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.19/0.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6051
% 0.19/0.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5612
% 0.19/0.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 117
% 0.19/0.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 937
% 0.19/0.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.19/0.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.19/0.49 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 15124
% 0.19/0.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 5009
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % User time : 0.023 s
% 0.19/0.49 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.49 % Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.19/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % User time : 0.041 s
% 0.19/0.49 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.19/0.49 % Total time : 0.053 s
% 0.19/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------