%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR074+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.31s 1.01s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 71 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 62 ( 27 ~; 22 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query174,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query174) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( genlmt(X21,X22)
& mtvisible(X21) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_7302,axiom,
! [X15,X16,X17] :
( ( inregion(X16,X17)
& inregion(X15,X16) )
=> inregion(X15,X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7302) ).
fof(ax2_1935,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( geographicalsubregions(X3,X4)
=> inregion(X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1935) ).
fof(ax2_1651,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1651) ).
fof(ax2_2249,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_2249) ).
fof(ax2_1188,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1188) ).
fof(ax2_912,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_912) ).
fof(ax2_1111,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1111) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query174]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X45,X46] :
( mtvisible(X46)
| ~ genlmt(X45,X46)
| ~ mtvisible(X45) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) )
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X41,X42,X43] :
( inregion(X41,X43)
| ~ inregion(X42,X43)
| ~ inregion(X41,X42) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7302])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X25,X26] :
( inregion(X26,X25)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X25,X26) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1935])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1651])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_2249])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1188]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ inregion(X2,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X2)
| inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| inregion(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_912])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1111]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X3)
| inregion(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
| inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR074+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:46:55 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.31/1.01 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.31/1.01 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/1.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % sh5l with pid 1118344 completed with status 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.31/1.01 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/1.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.31/1.01 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.31/1.01 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/1.01 % partial match(2): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/1.01 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1118347 completed with status 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.31/1.01 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/1.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.31/1.01 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.31/1.01 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/1.01 % partial match(2): FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/1.01 % Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/1.01 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.31/1.01 % Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.31/1.01
% 0.31/1.01 % Proof found!
% 0.31/1.01 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.31/1.01 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.31/1.01 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.31/1.01 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7415
% 0.31/1.01 % Initial clauses : 592
% 0.31/1.01 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Initial clauses in saturation : 592
% 0.31/1.01 % Processed clauses : 4084
% 0.31/1.01 % ...of these trivial : 168
% 0.31/1.01 % ...subsumed : 994
% 0.31/1.01 % ...remaining for further processing : 2922
% 0.31/1.01 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Backward-subsumed : 11
% 0.31/1.01 % Backward-rewritten : 49
% 0.31/1.01 % Generated clauses : 9044
% 0.31/1.01 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5921
% 0.31/1.01 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Paramodulations : 9044
% 0.31/1.01 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % NegExts : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Total rewrite steps : 2506
% 0.31/1.01 % ...of those cached : 2061
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/1.01 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/1.01 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.31/1.01 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/1.01 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/1.01 % Current number of processed clauses : 2862
% 0.31/1.01 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 771
% 0.31/1.01 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Negative unit clauses : 102
% 0.31/1.01 % Non-unit-clauses : 1989
% 0.31/1.01 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2407
% 0.31/1.01 % ...number of literals in the above : 5927
% 0.31/1.01 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Current number of archived clauses : 60
% 0.31/1.01 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 273635
% 0.31/1.01 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 249178
% 0.31/1.01 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 894
% 0.31/1.01 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48295
% 0.31/1.01 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % BW rewrite match attempts : 29
% 0.31/1.01 % BW rewrite match successes : 27
% 0.31/1.01 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.31/1.01 % Termbank termtop insertions : 143363
% 0.31/1.01 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31800
% 0.31/1.01
% 0.31/1.01 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/1.01 % User time : 0.345 s
% 0.31/1.01 % System time : 0.051 s
% 0.31/1.01 % Total time : 0.396 s
% 0.31/1.01 % Maximum resident set size: 20340 pages
% 0.31/1.01
% 0.31/1.01 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/1.01 % User time : 0.465 s
% 0.31/1.01 % System time : 0.065 s
% 0.31/1.01 % Total time : 0.531 s
% 0.31/1.01 % Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages
% 0.31/1.01 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------