↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR074+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.74s 3.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   50 (   0 equ;  24 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2353,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_2353) ).

cnf(i_0_75,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_75) ).

cnf(i_0_2471,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_2471) ).

cnf(i_0_534,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_534) ).

cnf(i_0_2018,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_2018) ).

cnf(i_0_805,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_805) ).

cnf(i_0_357,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_357) ).

cnf(i_0_978,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_978) ).

cnf(i_0_549,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_549) ).

cnf(i_0_2470,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6q09s8gi/lgb.p',i_0_2470) ).

cnf(c_0_2482,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2353 ).

cnf(c_0_2483,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_75 ).

cnf(c_0_2484,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    i_0_2471 ).

cnf(c_0_2485,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    i_0_534 ).

cnf(c_0_2486,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2482,c_0_2483]),c_0_2484])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2487,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_2018 ).

cnf(c_0_2488,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_805 ).

cnf(c_0_2489,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    i_0_357 ).

cnf(c_0_2490,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    i_0_978 ).

cnf(c_0_2491,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2482,c_0_2485]),c_0_2486])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2492,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2487,c_0_2488]) ).

cnf(c_0_2493,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2489,c_0_2484])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2494,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    i_0_549 ).

cnf(c_0_2495,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    i_0_2470 ).

cnf(c_0_2496,plain,
    geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2490,c_0_2491])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2497,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2492,c_0_2493]) ).

cnf(c_0_2498,plain,
    inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2494,c_0_2484])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2499,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2495,c_0_2496])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2500,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2497,c_0_2498]),c_0_2499]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR074+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:26:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.41/0.60  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.41/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.41/0.60  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.74/3.20  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.74/3.20  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.74/3.20  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.74/3.20  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C12_02_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S033N
% 8.74/3.20  # and selection function PSelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 8.74/3.20  #
% 8.74/3.20  # Preprocessing time       : 0.021 s
% 8.74/3.20  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.74/3.20  
% 8.74/3.20  # Proof found!
% 8.74/3.20  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.74/3.20  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.74/3.20  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.74/3.20  
% 8.74/3.20  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.74/3.20  # User time                : 0.072 s
% 8.74/3.20  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 8.74/3.20  # Total time               : 0.081 s
% 8.74/3.20  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.74/3.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------