↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR075+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.41s 7.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   52 (  23   ~;  19   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   3 sgn  13   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
          & s__instance(X8,X6) )
       => s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
     => ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
    ? [X1223] : s__member(X1223,s__Org1_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_734,axiom,
    ! [X85] :
      ( s__instance(X85,s__Collection)
     => ? [X51] :
          ( s__instance(X51,s__SelfConnectedObject)
          & s__member(X51,X85) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_734) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_7890,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Organization,s__Group),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7890) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_7741,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Group,s__Collection),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7741) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Organization),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_1) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X9,X10)
      | ~ s__instance(X11,X9)
      | s__instance(X11,X10) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] :
      ( ( s__instance(X8,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) )
      & ( s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1223] : s__member(X1223,s__Org1_1),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1224] : ~ s__member(X1224,s__Org1_1),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X86] :
      ( ( s__instance(esk1_1(X86),s__SelfConnectedObject)
        | ~ s__instance(X86,s__Collection) )
      & ( s__member(esk1_1(X86),X86)
        | ~ s__instance(X86,s__Collection) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_734])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Organization,s__Group),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7890]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__member(X1,s__Org1_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( s__member(esk1_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Collection) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Group,s__Collection),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7741]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__Group)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organization) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Organization),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Collection),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__Collection)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Group) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Group),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : CSR075+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:53:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.41/7.60  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 6.41/7.60  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 6.41/7.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.471 s
% 6.41/7.60  
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof found!
% 6.41/7.60  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.41/7.60  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object total steps             : 26
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object formula steps           : 12
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 6.41/7.60  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 6.41/7.60  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.41/7.60  # Parsed axioms                        : 37983
% 6.41/7.60  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 37882
% 6.41/7.60  # Initial clauses                      : 112
% 6.41/7.60  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 6.41/7.60  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 108
% 6.41/7.60  # Processed clauses                    : 236
% 6.41/7.60  # ...of these trivial                  : 66
% 6.41/7.60  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 6.41/7.60  # ...remaining for further processing  : 169
% 6.41/7.60  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 6.41/7.60  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.41/7.60  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 6.41/7.60  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 6.41/7.60  # Generated clauses                    : 321
% 6.41/7.60  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 261
% 6.41/7.60  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 24
% 6.41/7.60  # Paramodulations                      : 320
% 6.41/7.60  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 6.41/7.60  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 6.41/7.60  # Current number of processed clauses  : 167
% 6.41/7.60  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 66
% 6.41/7.60  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.41/7.60  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 6.41/7.60  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 99
% 6.41/7.60  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 133
% 6.41/7.60  # ...number of literals in the above   : 458
% 6.41/7.60  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.41/7.60  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 6.41/7.60  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1433
% 6.41/7.60  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 607
% 6.41/7.60  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 25
% 6.41/7.60  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 213
% 6.41/7.60  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.41/7.60  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 6.41/7.60  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 6.41/7.60  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.41/7.60  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.41/7.60  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 258016
% 6.41/7.60  
% 6.41/7.60  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.41/7.60  # User time                : 0.438 s
% 6.41/7.60  # System time              : 0.039 s
% 6.41/7.60  # Total time               : 0.477 s
% 6.41/7.60  # Maximum resident set size: 54616 pages
% 6.41/29.59  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.41/29.60  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.41/29.62  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.62  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.63  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.63  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.63  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.63  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.63  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.63  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.41/29.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.67  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.67  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.67  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.67  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.41/29.67  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.41/29.67  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------