%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR075+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 21.52s 4.12s
% Output : CNFRefutation 21.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 56 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 54 ( 24 ~; 20 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 3 sgn 13 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
? [X591] : s__member(X591,s__Org1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_630,axiom,
! [X85] :
( s__instance(X85,s__Collection)
=> ? [X51] :
( s__member(X51,X85)
& s__instance(X51,s__SelfConnectedObject) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_630) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6547,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Group,s__Collection),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_6547) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6696,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Organization,s__Group),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_6696) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Organization),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X671,X672,X673] :
( s__instance(X673,X672)
| ~ s__instance(X673,X671)
| ~ s__subclass(X671,X672)
| ~ s__instance(X671,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X672,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X669,X670] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X669,X670)
| s__instance(X670,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X669,X670)
| s__instance(X669,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X591] : s__member(X591,s__Org1_1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
! [X592] : ~ s__member(X592,s__Org1_1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X595] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X595,s__Collection)
| s__member(esk1_1(X595),X595) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X595,s__Collection)
| s__instance(esk1_1(X595),s__SelfConnectedObject) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_630])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
s__subclass(s__Group,s__Collection),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6547]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__subclass(s__Organization,s__Group),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6696]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ s__member(X1,s__Org1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Collection)
| s__member(esk1_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Group)
| s__instance(X1,s__Collection) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organization)
| s__instance(X1,s__Group) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Collection),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organization)
| s__instance(X1,s__Collection) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Organization),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR075+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.39 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:50:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.52/4.12 % Version: 3.5.1
% 21.52/4.12 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 21.52/4.12 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % sh5l with pid 2540530 completed with status 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Result found by sh5l
% 21.52/4.12 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 21.52/4.12 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 21.52/4.12 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 21.52/4.12 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 21.52/4.12 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2540535 completed with status 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 21.52/4.12 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 21.52/4.12 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 21.52/4.12 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 21.52/4.12 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 21.52/4.12 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 21.52/4.12 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 21.52/4.12 % Preprocessing time : 0.048 s
% 21.52/4.12
% 21.52/4.12 % Proof found!
% 21.52/4.12 % SZS status Theorem
% 21.52/4.12 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 21.52/4.12 % Parsed axioms : 7219
% 21.52/4.12 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4694
% 21.52/4.12 % Initial clauses : 3097
% 21.52/4.12 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 58
% 21.52/4.12 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3039
% 21.52/4.12 % Processed clauses : 12031
% 21.52/4.12 % ...of these trivial : 584
% 21.52/4.12 % ...subsumed : 3184
% 21.52/4.12 % ...remaining for further processing : 8263
% 21.52/4.12 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 88
% 21.52/4.12 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Backward-subsumed : 1418
% 21.52/4.12 % Backward-rewritten : 3676
% 21.52/4.12 % Generated clauses : 52734
% 21.52/4.12 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 51314
% 21.52/4.12 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 80
% 21.52/4.12 % Paramodulations : 52578
% 21.52/4.12 % Factorizations : 66
% 21.52/4.12 % NegExts : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Equation resolutions : 90
% 21.52/4.12 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Total rewrite steps : 5628
% 21.52/4.12 % ...of those cached : 3945
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional check models : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 21.52/4.12 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 21.52/4.12 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 21.52/4.12 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 21.52/4.12 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 21.52/4.12 % Current number of processed clauses : 3163
% 21.52/4.12 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1455
% 21.52/4.12 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 21.52/4.12 % Non-unit-clauses : 1705
% 21.52/4.12 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28324
% 21.52/4.12 % ...number of literals in the above : 91445
% 21.52/4.12 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Current number of archived clauses : 5094
% 21.52/4.12 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10102323
% 21.52/4.12 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8164236
% 21.52/4.12 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4525
% 21.52/4.12 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 356588
% 21.52/4.12 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 2
% 21.52/4.12 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1925
% 21.52/4.12 % BW rewrite match successes : 1124
% 21.52/4.12 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Condensation successes : 0
% 21.52/4.12 % Termbank termtop insertions : 719380
% 21.52/4.12 % Search garbage collected termcells : 69827
% 21.52/4.12
% 21.52/4.12 % -------------------------------------------------
% 21.52/4.12 % User time : 3.165 s
% 21.52/4.12 % System time : 0.100 s
% 21.52/4.12 % Total time : 3.265 s
% 21.52/4.12 % Maximum resident set size: 25136 pages
% 21.52/4.12
% 21.52/4.12 % -------------------------------------------------
% 21.52/4.12 % User time : 3.332 s
% 21.52/4.12 % System time : 0.113 s
% 21.52/4.12 % Total time : 3.446 s
% 21.52/4.12 % Maximum resident set size: 12544 pages
% 21.52/4.12 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------