%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR075+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 70.16s 11.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 70.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 3 sgn 13 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
? [X1223] : s__member(X1223,s__Org1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_734,axiom,
! [X85] :
( s__instance(X85,s__Collection)
=> ? [X51] :
( s__member(X51,X85)
& s__instance(X51,s__SelfConnectedObject) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_734) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7890,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Organization,s__Group),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7890) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7741,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Group,s__Collection),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7741) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Organization),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1290,X1291,X1292] :
( s__instance(X1292,X1291)
| ~ s__instance(X1292,X1290)
| ~ s__subclass(X1290,X1291)
| ~ s__instance(X1290,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1291,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1288,X1289] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1288,X1289)
| s__instance(X1289,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1288,X1289)
| s__instance(X1288,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1223] : s__member(X1223,s__Org1_1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
! [X1224] : ~ s__member(X1224,s__Org1_1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1227] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X1227,s__Collection)
| s__member(esk1_1(X1227),X1227) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1227,s__Collection)
| s__instance(esk1_1(X1227),s__SelfConnectedObject) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_734])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
s__subclass(s__Organization,s__Group),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7890]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__subclass(s__Group,s__Collection),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7741]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ s__member(X1,s__Org1_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Collection)
| s__member(esk1_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organization)
| s__instance(X1,s__Group) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Group)
| s__instance(X1,s__Collection) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Collection),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
s__instance(s__Org1_1,s__Organization),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21,c_0_22,c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR075+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:47:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 70.16/11.83 % Version: 3.5.1
% 70.16/11.83 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 70.16/11.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 133681 completed with status 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 70.16/11.83 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 70.16/11.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 70.16/11.83 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 70.16/11.83 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 70.16/11.83 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 133692 completed with status 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 70.16/11.83 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 70.16/11.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 70.16/11.83 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 70.16/11.83 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 70.16/11.83 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 70.16/11.83 % Preprocessing time : 0.098 s
% 70.16/11.83 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 70.16/11.83 % SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 70.16/11.83
% 70.16/11.83 % Proof found!
% 70.16/11.83 % SZS status Theorem
% 70.16/11.83 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 70.16/11.83 % Parsed axioms : 16750
% 70.16/11.83 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 12975
% 70.16/11.83 % Initial clauses : 5289
% 70.16/11.83 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 57
% 70.16/11.83 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5232
% 70.16/11.83 % Processed clauses : 16200
% 70.16/11.83 % ...of these trivial : 813
% 70.16/11.83 % ...subsumed : 387
% 70.16/11.83 % ...remaining for further processing : 15000
% 70.16/11.83 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 116
% 70.16/11.83 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Backward-subsumed : 30
% 70.16/11.83 % Backward-rewritten : 1920
% 70.16/11.83 % Generated clauses : 38156
% 70.16/11.83 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 35487
% 70.16/11.83 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 484
% 70.16/11.83 % Paramodulations : 38040
% 70.16/11.83 % Factorizations : 9
% 70.16/11.83 % NegExts : 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Equation resolutions : 117
% 70.16/11.83 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Total rewrite steps : 5138
% 70.16/11.83 % ...of those cached : 2757
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional unsat checks : 4
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional check models : 3
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional clauses : 32145
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional clauses after purity: 1122
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional unsat core size : 4
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional encoding time : 0.163
% 70.16/11.83 % Propositional solver time : 0.059
% 70.16/11.83 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 70.16/11.83 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.091
% 70.16/11.83 % Success case prop solver time : 0.007
% 70.16/11.83 % Current number of processed clauses : 7884
% 70.16/11.83 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2430
% 70.16/11.83 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 70.16/11.83 % Negative unit clauses : 161
% 70.16/11.83 % Non-unit-clauses : 5289
% 70.16/11.83 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24261
% 70.16/11.83 % ...number of literals in the above : 85442
% 70.16/11.83 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Current number of archived clauses : 7060
% 70.16/11.83 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8235668
% 70.16/11.83 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3099954
% 70.16/11.83 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 880
% 70.16/11.83 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1773473
% 70.16/11.83 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 70.16/11.83 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3150
% 70.16/11.83 % BW rewrite match successes : 1423
% 70.16/11.83 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Condensation successes : 0
% 70.16/11.83 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1197481
% 70.16/11.83 % Search garbage collected termcells : 134200
% 70.16/11.83
% 70.16/11.83 % -------------------------------------------------
% 70.16/11.83 % User time : 9.766 s
% 70.16/11.83 % System time : 0.316 s
% 70.16/11.83 % Total time : 10.082 s
% 70.16/11.83 % Maximum resident set size: 52632 pages
% 70.16/11.83
% 70.16/11.83 % -------------------------------------------------
% 70.16/11.83 % User time : 46.321 s
% 70.16/11.83 % System time : 1.266 s
% 70.16/11.83 % Total time : 47.587 s
% 70.16/11.83 % Maximum resident set size: 22272 pages
% 70.16/11.83 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------