%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR079+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 18.70s 4.32s
% Output : CNFRefutation 18.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 52 ( 41 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 76 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 45 ( 21 ~; 17 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 15 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(local_24,axiom,
s__Class5_2 = s__Class5_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_24) ).
fof(local_23,axiom,
s__Class5_1 = s__Class5_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_23) ).
fof(local_25,axiom,
s__Class5_3 = s__Class5_4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_25) ).
fof(local_26,axiom,
s__Class5_4 = s__Class5_5,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_26) ).
fof(local_27,axiom,
s__Class5_5 = s__Class5_6,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_27) ).
fof(local_28,axiom,
s__Class5_6 = s__Class5_7,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_28) ).
fof(local_29,axiom,
s__Class5_7 = s__Class5_8,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_29) ).
fof(local_30,axiom,
s__Class5_8 = s__Class5_9,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_30) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(local_31,axiom,
s__Class5_9 = s__Class5_10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_31) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(local_33,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Class5_10,s__Reptile),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_33) ).
fof(kb_SUMOcache_7275,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+3.ax',kb_SUMOcache_7275) ).
fof(local_32,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Lizard5_1,s__Class5_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_32) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Lizard5_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
s__Class5_2 = s__Class5_3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__Class5_1 = s__Class5_2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s__Class5_3 = s__Class5_4,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__Class5_3 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
s__Class5_4 = s__Class5_5,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__Class5_4 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__Class5_5 = s__Class5_6,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
s__Class5_5 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__Class5_6 = s__Class5_7,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__Class5_6 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__Class5_7 = s__Class5_8,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__Class5_7 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
s__Class5_8 = s__Class5_9,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__Class5_8 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
! [X622,X623,X624] :
( s__instance(X624,X623)
| ~ s__instance(X624,X622)
| ~ s__subclass(X622,X623)
| ~ s__instance(X622,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X623,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X620,X621] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X620,X621)
| s__instance(X621,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X620,X621)
| s__instance(X620,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
s__Class5_9 = s__Class5_10,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
s__Class5_9 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class5_10,s__Reptile),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__Class5_10 = s__Class5_1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
fof(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMOcache_7275]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
s__subclass(s__Lizard5_1,s__Class5_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class5_1,s__Reptile),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
fof(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Reptile)
| s__instance(X1,s__Animal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Lizard5_1)
| s__instance(X1,s__Class5_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class5_1)
| s__instance(X1,s__Reptile) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
s__instance(s__Organism5_1,s__Lizard5_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47,c_0_48,c_0_49,c_0_50]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR079+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:48:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 18.70/4.32 % Version: 3.5.1
% 18.70/4.32 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.70/4.32 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2591273 completed with status 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 18.70/4.32 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.70/4.32 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 18.70/4.32 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_RUU_F100_L20000
% 18.70/4.32 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 18.70/4.32 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2591282 completed with status 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 18.70/4.32 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 18.70/4.32 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 18.70/4.32 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_RUU_F100_L20000
% 18.70/4.32 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 18.70/4.32 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 18.70/4.32 % Preprocessing time : 0.109 s
% 18.70/4.32 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 18.70/4.32 % SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 18.70/4.32
% 18.70/4.32 % Proof found!
% 18.70/4.32 % SZS status Theorem
% 18.70/4.32 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 18.70/4.32 % Parsed axioms : 14821
% 18.70/4.32 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5253
% 18.70/4.32 % Initial clauses : 10386
% 18.70/4.32 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 60
% 18.70/4.32 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10326
% 18.70/4.32 % Processed clauses : 22967
% 18.70/4.32 % ...of these trivial : 2552
% 18.70/4.32 % ...subsumed : 415
% 18.70/4.32 % ...remaining for further processing : 20000
% 18.70/4.32 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 101
% 18.70/4.32 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Backward-subsumed : 24
% 18.70/4.32 % Backward-rewritten : 930
% 18.70/4.32 % Generated clauses : 47439
% 18.70/4.32 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46430
% 18.70/4.32 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 460
% 18.70/4.32 % Paramodulations : 47341
% 18.70/4.32 % Factorizations : 4
% 18.70/4.32 % NegExts : 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Equation resolutions : 103
% 18.70/4.32 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Total rewrite steps : 7138
% 18.70/4.32 % ...of those cached : 5167
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional unsat checks : 5
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional check models : 4
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional clauses : 44818
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional clauses after purity: 6047
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional unsat core size : 5
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional encoding time : 0.123
% 18.70/4.32 % Propositional solver time : 0.088
% 18.70/4.32 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 18.70/4.32 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.048
% 18.70/4.32 % Success case prop solver time : 0.011
% 18.70/4.32 % Current number of processed clauses : 9176
% 18.70/4.32 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7096
% 18.70/4.32 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 28
% 18.70/4.32 % Negative unit clauses : 11
% 18.70/4.32 % Non-unit-clauses : 2041
% 18.70/4.32 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35642
% 18.70/4.32 % ...number of literals in the above : 76657
% 18.70/4.32 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Current number of archived clauses : 10766
% 18.70/4.32 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2600871
% 18.70/4.32 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 608553
% 18.70/4.32 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 852
% 18.70/4.32 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 452588
% 18.70/4.32 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 198
% 18.70/4.32 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4455
% 18.70/4.32 % BW rewrite match successes : 681
% 18.70/4.32 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Condensation successes : 0
% 18.70/4.32 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1040803
% 18.70/4.32 % Search garbage collected termcells : 83467
% 18.70/4.32
% 18.70/4.32 % -------------------------------------------------
% 18.70/4.32 % User time : 3.342 s
% 18.70/4.32 % System time : 0.159 s
% 18.70/4.32 % Total time : 3.501 s
% 18.70/4.32 % Maximum resident set size: 37228 pages
% 18.70/4.32
% 18.70/4.32 % -------------------------------------------------
% 18.70/4.32 % User time : 12.215 s
% 18.70/4.32 % System time : 0.568 s
% 18.70/4.32 % Total time : 12.783 s
% 18.70/4.32 % Maximum resident set size: 15616 pages
% 18.70/4.32 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------