%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR080+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.44s 76.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 20 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 118 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 128 ( 48 ~; 56 |; 17 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 65 ( 33 sgn 22 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__part(s__Object6_1,s__Object6_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3496,axiom,
! [X171,X172,X173] :
( X172 = s__UnionFn(X173,X171)
<=> ! [X174,X175,X176] :
( ( s__instance(X173,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X172,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X171,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X174,X173)
& s__instance(X175,X171)
& s__instance(X176,X172) )
=> ( s__instance(X174,X172)
& s__instance(X175,X172)
& ( s__instance(X176,X173)
| s__instance(X176,X171) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3496) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_100,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( s__instance(X16,s__Substance)
& s__instance(X15,s__Substance) )
=> ( s__piece(X15,X16)
=> s__part(X15,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_100) ).
fof(local_5,axiom,
s__piece(s__Object6_2,s__Object6_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object6_3,s__Substance),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object6_2,s__Substance),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3533,axiom,
! [X168] :
( s__instance(X168,s__SetOrClass)
=> ( s__instance(X168,s__NullSet)
=> ~ ? [X48] : s__instance(X48,X168) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3533) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__piece(s__Object6_1,s__Object6_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object6_1,s__Substance),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ s__part(s__Object6_1,s__Object6_3),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X177,X178,X179,X180,X181,X182,X177,X178,X179] :
( ( s__instance(X180,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X181,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X182,X179)
| s__instance(X182,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk160_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| ~ s__instance(esk158_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk159_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3496])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ s__part(s__Object6_1,s__Object6_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X17,X18] :
( ~ s__instance(X18,s__Substance)
| ~ s__instance(X17,s__Substance)
| ~ s__piece(X17,X18)
| s__part(X17,X18) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_100])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ s__part(s__Object6_1,s__Object6_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( s__part(X1,X2)
| ~ s__piece(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Substance)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Substance) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__piece(s__Object6_2,s__Object6_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s__instance(s__Object6_3,s__Substance),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__instance(s__Object6_2,s__Substance),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X169,X170] :
( ~ s__instance(X169,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X169,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X170,X169) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3533])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__part(X2,s__Object6_3) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__part(s__Object6_2,s__Object6_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk159_3(X3,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,esk159_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,esk159_3(s__NullSet,X3,X4))
| X3 = s__UnionFn(X4,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| X3 = X4 ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X4
| X5 = X6 ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X4 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
s__piece(s__Object6_1,s__Object6_2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
s__instance(s__Object6_1,s__Substance),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__part(s__Object6_1,s__Object6_2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ s__part(s__Object6_1,X1),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : CSR080+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 21:21:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.10/24.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.15 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.11/24.35 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.11/24.70 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.26/47.29 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.26/47.38 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.27/47.60 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.27/47.93 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.40/70.30 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.41/70.64 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.41/71.15 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/73.70 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.44/76.64 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.44/76.64 # OLD status Res
% 1.44/76.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.373 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 1.44/76.64 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.44/76.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.102 s
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.44/76.64 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.44/76.64 # Parsed axioms : 7223
% 1.44/76.64 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7205
% 1.44/76.64 # Initial clauses : 18
% 1.44/76.64 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 1.44/76.64 # Processed clauses : 26
% 1.44/76.64 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 1.44/76.64 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Generated clauses : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Paramodulations : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 1.44/76.64 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 1.44/76.64 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.44/76.64 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 1.44/76.64 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Termbank termtop insertions : 78216
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.44/76.64 # User time : 0.094 s
% 1.44/76.64 # System time : 0.008 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Total time : 0.102 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Maximum resident set size: 18392 pages
% 1.44/76.64 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.44/76.64 # OLD status Res
% 1.44/76.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.290 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f8b0f932169414d689b89e2a8b18d4600533b975 for 23 seconds:
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.44/76.64 # OLD status Res
% 1.44/76.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.276 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_fc511518e5f98a6b2c7baef820b71b6d1abb3e55 for 23 seconds:
% 1.44/76.64 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,02,80,1.0)
% 1.44/76.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.107 s
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.44/76.64 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.44/76.64 # Parsed axioms : 7223
% 1.44/76.64 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7207
% 1.44/76.64 # Initial clauses : 16
% 1.44/76.64 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 1.44/76.64 # Processed clauses : 24
% 1.44/76.64 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # ...remaining for further processing : 24
% 1.44/76.64 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Generated clauses : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Paramodulations : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 1.44/76.64 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 1.44/76.64 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.44/76.64 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 1.44/76.64 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 1.44/76.64 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 1.44/76.64 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Termbank termtop insertions : 77834
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.44/76.64 # User time : 0.097 s
% 1.44/76.64 # System time : 0.011 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Total time : 0.108 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Maximum resident set size: 18524 pages
% 1.44/76.64 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_95b56b3f38545d2cfee43b45856d192a814b65d5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.44/76.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.290 s
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof found!
% 1.44/76.64 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.44/76.64 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object total steps : 38
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object clause steps : 24
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object formula steps : 14
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object generating inferences : 12
% 1.44/76.64 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 13
% 1.44/76.64 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.44/76.64 # Parsed axioms : 7223
% 1.44/76.64 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Initial clauses : 8414
% 1.44/76.64 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 1.44/76.64 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8351
% 1.44/76.64 # Processed clauses : 11435
% 1.44/76.64 # ...of these trivial : 49
% 1.44/76.64 # ...subsumed : 1625
% 1.44/76.64 # ...remaining for further processing : 9761
% 1.44/76.64 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5238
% 1.44/76.64 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 176017
% 1.44/76.64 # Backward-subsumed : 653
% 1.44/76.64 # Backward-rewritten : 1860
% 1.44/76.64 # Generated clauses : 620975
% 1.44/76.64 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 615741
% 1.44/76.64 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Paramodulations : 615332
% 1.44/76.64 # Factorizations : 53
% 1.44/76.64 # Equation resolutions : 5375
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of processed clauses : 7027
% 1.44/76.64 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4085
% 1.44/76.64 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.44/76.64 # Negative unit clauses : 16
% 1.44/76.64 # Non-unit-clauses : 2925
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29790
% 1.44/76.64 # ...number of literals in the above : 47371
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Current number of archived clauses : 2724
% 1.44/76.64 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1135174
% 1.44/76.64 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 381774
% 1.44/76.64 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1576
% 1.44/76.64 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1222234
% 1.44/76.64 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 8904
% 1.44/76.64 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9122
% 1.44/76.64 # BW rewrite match successes : 8297
% 1.44/76.64 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.44/76.64 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3351804
% 1.44/76.64
% 1.44/76.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.44/76.64 # User time : 5.388 s
% 1.44/76.64 # System time : 0.120 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Total time : 5.508 s
% 1.44/76.64 # Maximum resident set size: 182668 pages
% 1.44/93.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.44/93.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.44/93.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.44/93.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.44/93.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.44/93.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.44/93.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.44/93.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.44/93.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.44/93.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.44/93.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.44/93.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.44/93.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.44/93.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.44/93.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.44/94.17 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.44/94.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.44/94.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.44/94.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.44/94.19 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------