↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR082+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.22s 2.92s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   84 (  39   ~;  32   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;  10 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   5 sgn  16   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
    ? [X1223,X1224] :
      ( s__capability(s__Perception,X1224,s__Jane8_1)
      & s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1223,s__Jane8_1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
          & s__subclass(X6,X7) )
       => s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
     => ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_6509,axiom,
    ! [X91] :
      ( s__instance(X91,s__Object)
     => ( s__instance(X91,s__CognitiveAgent)
       => s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X91) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_6509) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_6882,axiom,
    ! [X91] :
      ( s__instance(X91,s__Object)
     => ( s__instance(X91,s__SentientAgent)
       => s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X91) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_6882) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_15959,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__Object),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_15959) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_15952,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__SentientAgent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_15952) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_7281,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7281) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1223,X1224] :
        ( s__capability(s__Perception,X1224,s__Jane8_1)
        & s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1223,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1321,X1322,X1323] :
      ( s__instance(X1323,X1322)
      | ~ s__instance(X1323,X1321)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1321,X1322)
      | ~ s__instance(X1321,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1322,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1319,X1320] :
      ( ( ~ s__subclass(X1319,X1320)
        | s__instance(X1320,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( ~ s__subclass(X1319,X1320)
        | s__instance(X1319,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1225,X1226] :
      ( ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1226,s__Jane8_1)
      | ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1225,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1247] :
      ( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1247)
      | ~ s__instance(X1247,s__CognitiveAgent)
      | ~ s__instance(X1247,s__Object) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6509])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1)
    | ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
    | s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1243] :
      ( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1243)
      | ~ s__instance(X1243,s__SentientAgent)
      | ~ s__instance(X1243,s__Object) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6882])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__Object),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_15959]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
    | ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
    | s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__SentientAgent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_15952]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7281]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
    | s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR082+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:53:36 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.22/2.92  % Version: 3.5.1
% 6.22/2.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.22/2.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2543849 completed with status 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 6.22/2.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.22/2.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.22/2.92  % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 6.22/2.92  % Search class: FGHSS-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.22/2.92  % partial match(1): FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.22/2.92  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1495 seconds (1495 total)
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_042_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 113s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 2543858 completed with status 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 6.22/2.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.22/2.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.22/2.92  % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 6.22/2.92  % Search class: FGHSS-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.22/2.92  % partial match(1): FGHSS-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.22/2.92  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1495 seconds (1495 total)
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_042_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 113s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 113s (1) cores
% 6.22/2.92  % Preprocessing time       : 0.077 s
% 6.22/2.92  
% 6.22/2.92  % Proof found!
% 6.22/2.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 6.22/2.92  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.22/2.92  % Parsed axioms                        : 37983
% 6.22/2.92  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 36864
% 6.22/2.92  % Initial clauses                      : 1323
% 6.22/2.92  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 6.22/2.92  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1315
% 6.22/2.92  % Processed clauses                    : 1939
% 6.22/2.92  % ...of these trivial                  : 184
% 6.22/2.92  % ...subsumed                          : 88
% 6.22/2.92  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1667
% 6.22/2.92  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 6.22/2.92  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 6.22/2.92  % Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 6.22/2.92  % Generated clauses                    : 5331
% 6.22/2.92  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5064
% 6.22/2.92  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 78
% 6.22/2.92  % Paramodulations                      : 5328
% 6.22/2.92  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 6.22/2.92  % NegExts                              : 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 6.22/2.92  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Total rewrite steps                  : 705
% 6.22/2.92  % ...of those cached                   : 563
% 6.22/2.92  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.22/2.92  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 6.22/2.92  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.22/2.92  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 6.22/2.92  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.22/2.92  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 6.22/2.92  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 6.22/2.92  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 6.22/2.92  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 6.22/2.92  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 6.22/2.92  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 6.22/2.92  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 6.22/2.92  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1648
% 6.22/2.92  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 901
% 6.22/2.92  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.22/2.92  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 6.22/2.92  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 744
% 6.22/2.92  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4440
% 6.22/2.92  % ...number of literals in the above   : 15061
% 6.22/2.92  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Current number of archived clauses   : 18
% 6.22/2.92  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 80123
% 6.22/2.92  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26528
% 6.22/2.92  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 165
% 6.22/2.92  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2647
% 6.22/2.92  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.22/2.92  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 6.22/2.92  % BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 6.22/2.92  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.22/2.92  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 373209
% 6.22/2.92  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 129533
% 6.22/2.92  
% 6.22/2.92  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.22/2.92  % User time                : 0.673 s
% 6.22/2.92  % System time              : 0.158 s
% 6.22/2.92  % Total time               : 0.832 s
% 6.22/2.92  % Maximum resident set size: 52324 pages
% 6.22/2.92  
% 6.22/2.92  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.22/2.92  % User time                : 3.680 s
% 6.22/2.92  % System time              : 0.609 s
% 6.22/2.92  % Total time               : 4.289 s
% 6.22/2.92  % Maximum resident set size: 31744 pages
% 6.22/2.92  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------