%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR082+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.93s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 86 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 85 ( 39 ~; 33 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 5 sgn 16 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
? [X1223,X1224] :
( s__capability(s__Perception,X1224,s__Jane8_1)
& s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1223,s__Jane8_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_830,axiom,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_830) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_832,axiom,
s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_832) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7281,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7281) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6509,axiom,
! [X91] :
( s__instance(X91,s__Object)
=> ( s__instance(X91,s__CognitiveAgent)
=> s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X91) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_6509) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6882,axiom,
! [X91] :
( s__instance(X91,s__Object)
=> ( s__instance(X91,s__SentientAgent)
=> s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X91) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_6882) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_827,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_827) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1238,X1239,X1240] :
( s__instance(X1240,X1239)
| ~ s__instance(X1240,X1238)
| ~ s__subclass(X1238,X1239)
| ~ s__instance(X1238,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1239,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X1236,X1237] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1236,X1237)
| s__instance(X1237,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1236,X1237)
| s__instance(X1236,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1223,X1224] :
( s__capability(s__Perception,X1224,s__Jane8_1)
& s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1223,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_830]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_832]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7281]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
! [X1225,X1226] :
( ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1226,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1225,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X1233] :
( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1233)
| ~ s__instance(X1233,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1233,s__Object) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6509])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Agent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
| s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X1229] :
( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1229)
| ~ s__instance(X1229,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1229,s__Object) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6882])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_827]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Agent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Agent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Agent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_31])]),c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_23]),c_0_31])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR082+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.43 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:52:02 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/1.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.93/1.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/1.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 3196303 completed with status 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.93/1.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/1.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.93/1.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.93/1.45 % Search class: FHHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.93/1.45 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.93/1.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3196307 completed with status 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.93/1.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/1.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.93/1.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.93/1.45 % Search class: FHHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.93/1.45 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.93/1.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.93/1.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.93/1.45
% 0.93/1.45 % Proof found!
% 0.93/1.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.93/1.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.93/1.45 % Parsed axioms : 16750
% 0.93/1.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16588
% 0.93/1.45 % Initial clauses : 193
% 0.93/1.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.93/1.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 189
% 0.93/1.45 % Processed clauses : 283
% 0.93/1.45 % ...of these trivial : 22
% 0.93/1.45 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.93/1.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 259
% 0.93/1.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.93/1.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.93/1.45 % Generated clauses : 180
% 0.93/1.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 168
% 0.93/1.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 12
% 0.93/1.45 % Paramodulations : 179
% 0.93/1.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.93/1.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Total rewrite steps : 28
% 0.93/1.45 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 256
% 0.93/1.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 104
% 0.93/1.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.93/1.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 151
% 0.93/1.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73
% 0.93/1.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 375
% 0.93/1.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.93/1.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1822
% 0.93/1.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1084
% 0.93/1.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 0.93/1.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 75
% 0.93/1.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.93/1.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.93/1.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.93/1.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 181038
% 0.93/1.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 89008
% 0.93/1.45
% 0.93/1.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.93/1.45 % User time : 0.143 s
% 0.93/1.45 % System time : 0.095 s
% 0.93/1.45 % Total time : 0.238 s
% 0.93/1.45 % Maximum resident set size: 42648 pages
% 0.93/1.45
% 0.93/1.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.93/1.45 % User time : 0.786 s
% 0.93/1.45 % System time : 0.152 s
% 0.93/1.45 % Total time : 0.937 s
% 0.93/1.45 % Maximum resident set size: 22016 pages
% 0.93/1.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------