%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR082+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.92s 2.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 48 ( 19 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 150 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 167 ( 65 ~; 70 |; 22 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 13 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 62 ( 12 sgn 31 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1138,X136) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
| s__instance(X1139,X136) )
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_46128,axiom,
s__subclass(s__ReconnaissanceOperation,s__Investigating),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_46128) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
! [X1,X15,X13] :
( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X13,X1)
& s__subclass(X1,X15) )
=> s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341,X2342] :
( s__capability(s__Perception,X2342,s__Jane8_1)
& s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2341,s__Jane8_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27595,axiom,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27595) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27597,axiom,
s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27597) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_35206,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_35206) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_34434,axiom,
! [X20] :
( s__instance(X20,s__Object)
=> ( s__instance(X20,s__CognitiveAgent)
=> s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X20) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_34434) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_34807,axiom,
! [X20] :
( s__instance(X20,s__Object)
=> ( s__instance(X20,s__SentientAgent)
=> s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X20) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_34807) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27592,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27592) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X2354,X2355] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X2354,X2355)
| s__instance(X2355,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X2354,X2355)
| s__instance(X2354,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X2542,X2543,X2544,X2545,X2546,X2547,X2548,X2549,X2550] :
( ( X2549 = s__UnionFn(X2550,X2548)
| ~ s__instance(esk15_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2549)
| ~ s__instance(esk14_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2549)
| ~ s__instance(esk16_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2548) )
& ( X2549 = s__UnionFn(X2550,X2548)
| ~ s__instance(esk15_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2549)
| ~ s__instance(esk14_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2549)
| ~ s__instance(esk16_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2550) )
& ( X2549 = s__UnionFn(X2550,X2548)
| s__instance(esk16_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2549) )
& ( X2549 = s__UnionFn(X2550,X2548)
| s__instance(esk15_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2548) )
& ( X2549 = s__UnionFn(X2550,X2548)
| s__instance(esk14_3(X2548,X2549,X2550),X2550) )
& ( X2549 = s__UnionFn(X2550,X2548)
| s__instance(X2548,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2549 = s__UnionFn(X2550,X2548)
| s__instance(X2549,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2549 = s__UnionFn(X2550,X2548)
| s__instance(X2550,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2543 != s__UnionFn(X2544,X2542)
| ~ s__instance(X2542,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2543,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2544,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2547,X2543)
| ~ s__instance(X2546,X2542)
| ~ s__instance(X2545,X2544)
| s__instance(X2547,X2542)
| s__instance(X2547,X2544) )
& ( X2543 != s__UnionFn(X2544,X2542)
| ~ s__instance(X2542,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2543,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2544,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2547,X2543)
| ~ s__instance(X2546,X2542)
| ~ s__instance(X2545,X2544)
| s__instance(X2546,X2543) )
& ( X2543 != s__UnionFn(X2544,X2542)
| ~ s__instance(X2542,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2543,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2544,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2547,X2543)
| ~ s__instance(X2546,X2542)
| ~ s__instance(X2545,X2544)
| s__instance(X2545,X2543) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
s__subclass(s__ReconnaissanceOperation,s__Investigating),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_46128]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__instance(s__ReconnaissanceOperation,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X2356,X2357,X2358] :
( s__instance(X2358,X2357)
| ~ s__instance(X2358,X2356)
| ~ s__subclass(X2356,X2357)
| ~ s__instance(X2356,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2357,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341,X2342] :
( s__capability(s__Perception,X2342,s__Jane8_1)
& s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2341,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27595]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27597]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_35206]) ).
fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343,X2344] :
( ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2344,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X2343,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X2351] :
( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X2351)
| ~ s__instance(X2351,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X2351,s__Object) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_34434])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Agent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
| s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X2347] :
( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X2347)
| ~ s__instance(X2347,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X2347,s__Object) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_34807])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27592]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Agent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Agent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Agent),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_39])]),c_0_45])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_31]),c_0_39])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR082+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:50:51 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.92/2.84 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.92/2.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.92/2.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % new_bool_1 with pid 2593362 completed with status 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 2.92/2.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.92/2.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.92/2.84 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.92/2.84 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 2.92/2.84 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 2.92/2.84 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2593365 completed with status 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 2.92/2.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.92/2.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.92/2.84 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.92/2.84 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 2.92/2.84 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 2.92/2.84 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 2.92/2.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 2.92/2.84 % Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 2.92/2.84
% 2.92/2.84 % Proof found!
% 2.92/2.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.92/2.84 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.92/2.84 % Parsed axioms : 55588
% 2.92/2.84 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55373
% 2.92/2.84 % Initial clauses : 321
% 2.92/2.84 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 19
% 2.92/2.84 % Initial clauses in saturation : 302
% 2.92/2.84 % Processed clauses : 325
% 2.92/2.84 % ...of these trivial : 15
% 2.92/2.84 % ...subsumed : 3
% 2.92/2.84 % ...remaining for further processing : 307
% 2.92/2.84 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 2.92/2.84 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 2.92/2.84 % Backward-rewritten : 50
% 2.92/2.84 % Generated clauses : 812
% 2.92/2.84 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 785
% 2.92/2.84 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 2.92/2.84 % Paramodulations : 809
% 2.92/2.84 % Factorizations : 2
% 2.92/2.84 % NegExts : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 2.92/2.84 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Total rewrite steps : 103
% 2.92/2.84 % ...of those cached : 27
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.92/2.84 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.92/2.84 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.92/2.84 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.92/2.84 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.92/2.84 % Current number of processed clauses : 249
% 2.92/2.84 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 74
% 2.92/2.84 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 2.92/2.84 % Non-unit-clauses : 174
% 2.92/2.84 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 266
% 2.92/2.84 % ...number of literals in the above : 1348
% 2.92/2.84 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Current number of archived clauses : 57
% 2.92/2.84 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3849
% 2.92/2.84 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2322
% 2.92/2.84 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 2.92/2.84 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 282
% 2.92/2.84 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % BW rewrite match attempts : 88
% 2.92/2.84 % BW rewrite match successes : 49
% 2.92/2.84 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.92/2.84 % Termbank termtop insertions : 687299
% 2.92/2.84 % Search garbage collected termcells : 295664
% 2.92/2.84
% 2.92/2.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.92/2.84 % User time : 0.294 s
% 2.92/2.84 % System time : 0.152 s
% 2.92/2.84 % Total time : 0.446 s
% 2.92/2.84 % Maximum resident set size: 137016 pages
% 2.92/2.84
% 2.92/2.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.92/2.84 % User time : 2.075 s
% 2.92/2.84 % System time : 0.255 s
% 2.92/2.84 % Total time : 2.329 s
% 2.92/2.84 % Maximum resident set size: 63232 pages
% 2.92/2.84 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------