%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR083+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.82s 0.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
? [X591] :
( X591 = s__Human
& s__subclass(X591,s__CognitiveAgent)
& s__subclass(X591,s__Animal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6087,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_6087) ).
fof(kb_SUMOcache_6048,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+3.ax',kb_SUMOcache_6048) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X591] :
( X591 = s__Human
& s__subclass(X591,s__CognitiveAgent)
& s__subclass(X591,s__Animal) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X592] :
( X592 != s__Human
| ~ s__subclass(X592,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__subclass(X592,s__Animal) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != s__Human
| ~ s__subclass(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,s__Animal) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6087]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMOcache_6048]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR083+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:51:19 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.82/0.80 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.82/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.82/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % new_bool_1 with pid 3759149 completed with status 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.82/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.82/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.82/0.80 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.82/0.80 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.82/0.80 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.82/0.80 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3759151 completed with status 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.82/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.82/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.82/0.80 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.82/0.80 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.82/0.80 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.82/0.80 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.82/0.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.80 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.82/0.80
% 0.82/0.80 % Proof found!
% 0.82/0.80 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.82/0.80 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.82/0.80 % Parsed axioms : 14788
% 0.82/0.80 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14669
% 0.82/0.80 % Initial clauses : 122
% 0.82/0.80 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.82/0.80 % Initial clauses in saturation : 118
% 0.82/0.80 % Processed clauses : 132
% 0.82/0.80 % ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.82/0.80 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % ...remaining for further processing : 125
% 0.82/0.80 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.82/0.80 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.82/0.80 % Generated clauses : 206
% 0.82/0.80 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 168
% 0.82/0.80 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Paramodulations : 205
% 0.82/0.80 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % NegExts : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.82/0.80 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Total rewrite steps : 48
% 0.82/0.80 % ...of those cached : 34
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.80 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.80 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.80 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.80 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.80 % Current number of processed clauses : 122
% 0.82/0.80 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 119
% 0.82/0.80 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.82/0.80 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 154
% 0.82/0.80 % ...number of literals in the above : 169
% 0.82/0.80 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.82/0.80 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.82/0.80 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.82/0.80 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.82/0.80 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.82/0.80 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.82/0.80 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.82/0.80 % Termbank termtop insertions : 110752
% 0.82/0.80 % Search garbage collected termcells : 52787
% 0.82/0.80
% 0.82/0.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/0.80 % User time : 0.049 s
% 0.82/0.80 % System time : 0.040 s
% 0.82/0.80 % Total time : 0.090 s
% 0.82/0.80 % Maximum resident set size: 22368 pages
% 0.82/0.80
% 0.82/0.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/0.80 % User time : 0.310 s
% 0.82/0.80 % System time : 0.058 s
% 0.82/0.80 % Total time : 0.368 s
% 0.82/0.80 % Maximum resident set size: 15872 pages
% 0.82/0.80 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------