%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR083+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.58s 6.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
? [X1223] :
( X1223 = s__Human
& s__subclass(X1223,s__CognitiveAgent)
& s__subclass(X1223,s__Animal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7281,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7281) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_15950,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_15950) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1223] :
( X1223 = s__Human
& s__subclass(X1223,s__CognitiveAgent)
& s__subclass(X1223,s__Animal) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X1224] :
( X1224 != s__Human
| ~ s__subclass(X1224,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__subclass(X1224,s__Animal) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != s__Human
| ~ s__subclass(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,s__Animal) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7281]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_15950]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR083+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.38 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:54:13 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.58/6.52 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.58/6.52 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.58/6.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % new_bool_1 with pid 2545051 completed with status 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.58/6.52 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.58/6.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.58/6.52 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.58/6.52 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 1.58/6.52 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2545053 completed with status 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.58/6.52 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.58/6.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.58/6.52 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.58/6.52 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 1.58/6.52 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.58/6.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.58/6.52 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 1.58/6.52
% 1.58/6.52 % Proof found!
% 1.58/6.52 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.58/6.52 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.58/6.52 % Parsed axioms : 37982
% 1.58/6.52 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37906
% 1.58/6.52 % Initial clauses : 79
% 1.58/6.52 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 1.58/6.52 % Initial clauses in saturation : 75
% 1.58/6.52 % Processed clauses : 88
% 1.58/6.52 % ...of these trivial : 9
% 1.58/6.52 % ...subsumed : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % ...remaining for further processing : 79
% 1.58/6.52 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.58/6.52 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 1.58/6.52 % Generated clauses : 136
% 1.58/6.52 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 121
% 1.58/6.52 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Paramodulations : 135
% 1.58/6.52 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % NegExts : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.58/6.52 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Total rewrite steps : 27
% 1.58/6.52 % ...of those cached : 17
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.58/6.52 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.58/6.52 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.58/6.52 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.58/6.52 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.58/6.52 % Current number of processed clauses : 76
% 1.58/6.52 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 73
% 1.58/6.52 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 1.58/6.52 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 108
% 1.58/6.52 % ...number of literals in the above : 121
% 1.58/6.52 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 1.58/6.52 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 1.58/6.52 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 1.58/6.52 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 1.58/6.52 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 1.58/6.52 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.58/6.52 % Termbank termtop insertions : 250602
% 1.58/6.52 % Search garbage collected termcells : 125507
% 1.58/6.52
% 1.58/6.52 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.58/6.52 % User time : 0.109 s
% 1.58/6.52 % System time : 0.070 s
% 1.58/6.52 % Total time : 0.179 s
% 1.58/6.52 % Maximum resident set size: 52068 pages
% 1.58/6.52
% 1.58/6.52 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.58/6.52 % User time : 0.939 s
% 1.58/6.52 % System time : 0.118 s
% 1.58/6.52 % Total time : 1.057 s
% 1.58/6.52 % Maximum resident set size: 31488 pages
% 1.58/6.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------