%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR083+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 103.91s 106.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 103.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341] :
( s__subclass(X2341,s__Animal)
& s__subclass(X2341,s__CognitiveAgent)
& X2341 = s__Human ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_68884,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Animal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_68884) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_35206,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_35206) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341] :
( s__subclass(X2341,s__Animal)
& s__subclass(X2341,s__CognitiveAgent)
& X2341 = s__Human ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X2342] :
( ~ s__subclass(X2342,s__Animal)
| ~ s__subclass(X2342,s__CognitiveAgent)
| X2342 != s__Human ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != s__Human
| ~ s__subclass(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,s__Animal) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Animal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_68884]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_35206]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CSR083+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 09:18:27 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 103.91/106.09 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 103.91/106.09 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 103.91/106.09 # Preprocessing time : 1.777 s
% 103.91/106.09
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof found!
% 103.91/106.09 # SZS status Theorem
% 103.91/106.09 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 103.91/106.09 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 103.91/106.09 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 103.91/106.09 # Parsed axioms : 145102
% 103.91/106.09 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 145003
% 103.91/106.09 # Initial clauses : 102
% 103.91/106.09 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 103.91/106.09 # Initial clauses in saturation : 97
% 103.91/106.09 # Processed clauses : 101
% 103.91/106.09 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 103.91/106.09 # ...subsumed : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # ...remaining for further processing : 98
% 103.91/106.09 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 103.91/106.09 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Generated clauses : 359
% 103.91/106.09 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 344
% 103.91/106.09 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 103.91/106.09 # Paramodulations : 358
% 103.91/106.09 # Factorizations : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 103.91/106.09 # Current number of processed clauses : 97
% 103.91/106.09 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 77
% 103.91/106.09 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 103.91/106.09 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 340
% 103.91/106.09 # ...number of literals in the above : 538
% 103.91/106.09 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 86
% 103.91/106.09 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 67
% 103.91/106.09 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 103.91/106.09 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 103.91/106.09 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Condensation successes : 0
% 103.91/106.09 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1011743
% 103.91/106.09
% 103.91/106.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 103.91/106.09 # User time : 1.680 s
% 103.91/106.09 # System time : 0.100 s
% 103.91/106.09 # Total time : 1.780 s
% 103.91/106.09 # Maximum resident set size: 187888 pages
% 103.91/126.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 103.91/126.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 103.91/126.23 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------