%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR084+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:40 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.12s 3.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 100 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 122 ( 46 ~; 50 |; 20 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 10 sgn 26 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2348] : s__instance(X2348,s__Invertebrate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
! [X1,X15,X13] :
( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X13,X1)
& s__subclass(X1,X15) )
=> s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1138,X136) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
| s__instance(X1139,X136) )
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_35129,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Arthropod,s__Invertebrate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_35129) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_2242,axiom,
s__instance(s__WestBank,s__LandArea),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_2242) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2348] : s__instance(X2348,s__Invertebrate),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X2400,X2401,X2402] :
( s__instance(X2402,X2401)
| ~ s__instance(X2402,X2400)
| ~ s__subclass(X2400,X2401)
| ~ s__instance(X2400,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2401,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2398,X2399] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X2398,X2399)
| s__instance(X2399,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X2398,X2399)
| s__instance(X2398,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X2349] : ~ s__instance(X2349,s__Invertebrate),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2456,X2457,X2458,X2459,X2460,X2461,X2462,X2463,X2464] :
( ( X2463 = s__UnionFn(X2464,X2462)
| ~ s__instance(esk10_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2463)
| ~ s__instance(esk9_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2463)
| ~ s__instance(esk11_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2462) )
& ( X2463 = s__UnionFn(X2464,X2462)
| ~ s__instance(esk10_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2463)
| ~ s__instance(esk9_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2463)
| ~ s__instance(esk11_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2464) )
& ( X2463 = s__UnionFn(X2464,X2462)
| s__instance(esk11_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2463) )
& ( X2463 = s__UnionFn(X2464,X2462)
| s__instance(esk10_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2462) )
& ( X2463 = s__UnionFn(X2464,X2462)
| s__instance(esk9_3(X2462,X2463,X2464),X2464) )
& ( X2463 = s__UnionFn(X2464,X2462)
| s__instance(X2462,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2463 = s__UnionFn(X2464,X2462)
| s__instance(X2463,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2463 = s__UnionFn(X2464,X2462)
| s__instance(X2464,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2457 != s__UnionFn(X2458,X2456)
| ~ s__instance(X2456,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2457,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2458,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2461,X2457)
| ~ s__instance(X2460,X2456)
| ~ s__instance(X2459,X2458)
| s__instance(X2461,X2456)
| s__instance(X2461,X2458) )
& ( X2457 != s__UnionFn(X2458,X2456)
| ~ s__instance(X2456,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2457,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2458,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2461,X2457)
| ~ s__instance(X2460,X2456)
| ~ s__instance(X2459,X2458)
| s__instance(X2460,X2457) )
& ( X2457 != s__UnionFn(X2458,X2456)
| ~ s__instance(X2456,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2457,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2458,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2461,X2457)
| ~ s__instance(X2460,X2456)
| ~ s__instance(X2459,X2458)
| s__instance(X2459,X2457) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Invertebrate),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
| s__instance(esk9_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__subclass(s__Arthropod,s__Invertebrate),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_35129]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
X1 = s__UnionFn(s__Invertebrate,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Arthropod),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__instance(s__WestBank,s__LandArea),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_2242]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR084+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:51:47 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.12/3.07 % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.12/3.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.12/3.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3759982 completed with status 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 4.12/3.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.12/3.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.12/3.07 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 4.12/3.07 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 4.12/3.07 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 4.12/3.07 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1490 seconds (1490 total)
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 135s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 135s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 135s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with pid 3759989 completed with status 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Result found by G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y
% 4.12/3.07 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 4.12/3.07 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.12/3.07 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 4.12/3.07 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 4.12/3.07 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 4.12/3.07 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1490 seconds (1490 total)
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 135s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 135s (1) cores
% 4.12/3.07 % Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 4.12/3.07 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.12/3.07
% 4.12/3.07 % Proof found!
% 4.12/3.07 % SZS status Theorem
% 4.12/3.07 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.12/3.07 % Parsed axioms : 55594
% 4.12/3.07 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55406
% 4.12/3.07 % Initial clauses : 259
% 4.12/3.07 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 10
% 4.12/3.07 % Initial clauses in saturation : 249
% 4.12/3.07 % Processed clauses : 519
% 4.12/3.07 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 4.12/3.07 % ...subsumed : 3
% 4.12/3.07 % ...remaining for further processing : 513
% 4.12/3.07 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Backward-subsumed : 135
% 4.12/3.07 % Backward-rewritten : 14
% 4.12/3.07 % Generated clauses : 2510
% 4.12/3.07 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2486
% 4.12/3.07 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 20
% 4.12/3.07 % Paramodulations : 2498
% 4.12/3.07 % Factorizations : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % NegExts : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Total rewrite steps : 33
% 4.12/3.07 % ...of those cached : 23
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional check models : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.12/3.07 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.12/3.07 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.12/3.07 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.12/3.07 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.12/3.07 % Current number of processed clauses : 106
% 4.12/3.07 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 102
% 4.12/3.07 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 4.12/3.07 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 4.12/3.07 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 4.12/3.07 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2310
% 4.12/3.07 % ...number of literals in the above : 6078
% 4.12/3.07 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Current number of archived clauses : 407
% 4.12/3.07 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7180
% 4.12/3.07 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 916
% 4.12/3.07 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26
% 4.12/3.07 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 788
% 4.12/3.07 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 548
% 4.12/3.07 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1557
% 4.12/3.07 % BW rewrite match successes : 495
% 4.12/3.07 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Condensation successes : 0
% 4.12/3.07 % Termbank termtop insertions : 687539
% 4.12/3.07 % Search garbage collected termcells : 292932
% 4.12/3.07
% 4.12/3.07 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.12/3.07 % User time : 0.283 s
% 4.12/3.07 % System time : 0.130 s
% 4.12/3.07 % Total time : 0.413 s
% 4.12/3.07 % Maximum resident set size: 137272 pages
% 4.12/3.07
% 4.12/3.07 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.12/3.07 % User time : 2.599 s
% 4.12/3.07 % System time : 0.386 s
% 4.12/3.07 % Total time : 2.985 s
% 4.12/3.07 % Maximum resident set size: 64000 pages
% 4.12/3.07 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------