%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR085+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:41 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 8.73s 6.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 101 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 126 ( 43 ~; 44 |; 34 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 7 sgn 19 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2342] : s__instance(X2342,s__Organism),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1138,X136) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
| s__instance(X1139,X136) )
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27491,axiom,
! [X193] :
( s__instance(X193,s__CorpuscularObject)
=> ? [X1066,X1067] :
( X1066 != X1067
& s__material(X1067,X193)
& s__material(X1066,X193)
& s__subclass(X1067,s__Substance)
& s__subclass(X1066,s__Substance)
& s__instance(X1066,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1067,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27491) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_28656,axiom,
s__instance(s__wants__m,s__ObjectAttitude),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_28656) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2342] : s__instance(X2342,s__Organism),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343] : ~ s__instance(X2343,s__Organism),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2368,X2369,X2370,X2371,X2372,X2373,X2374,X2375,X2376] :
( ( X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk1_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2374) )
& ( X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk1_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2376) )
& ( X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374)
| s__instance(esk3_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2375) )
& ( X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374)
| s__instance(esk2_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2374) )
& ( X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374)
| s__instance(esk1_3(X2374,X2375,X2376),X2376) )
& ( X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374)
| s__instance(X2374,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374)
| s__instance(X2375,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2375 = s__UnionFn(X2376,X2374)
| s__instance(X2376,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2369 != s__UnionFn(X2370,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,X2370)
| s__instance(X2373,X2368)
| s__instance(X2373,X2370) )
& ( X2369 != s__UnionFn(X2370,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,X2370)
| s__instance(X2372,X2369) )
& ( X2369 != s__UnionFn(X2370,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,X2370)
| s__instance(X2371,X2369) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X193] :
( s__instance(X193,s__CorpuscularObject)
=> ? [X1066,X1067] :
( X1066 != X1067
& s__material(X1067,X193)
& s__material(X1066,X193)
& s__subclass(X1067,s__Substance)
& s__subclass(X1066,s__Substance)
& s__instance(X1066,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1067,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27491]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
| s__instance(esk1_3(X1,X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2611] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject)
| esk11_1(X2611) != esk12_1(X2611) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject)
| s__material(esk12_1(X2611),X2611) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject)
| s__material(esk11_1(X2611),X2611) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject)
| s__subclass(esk12_1(X2611),s__Substance) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject)
| s__subclass(esk11_1(X2611),s__Substance) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject)
| s__instance(esk11_1(X2611),s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X2611,s__CorpuscularObject)
| s__instance(esk12_1(X2611),s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
X1 = s__UnionFn(s__Organism,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__CorpuscularObject)
| esk11_1(X1) != esk12_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__instance(s__wants__m,s__ObjectAttitude),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_28656]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
~ s__instance(X1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(s__wants__m,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR085+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.44 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:47:57 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.73/6.09 % Version: 3.5.1
% 8.73/6.09 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 8.73/6.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % sh5l with pid 2577251 completed with status 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Result found by sh5l
% 8.73/6.09 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 8.73/6.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 8.73/6.09 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 8.73/6.09 % Search class: FGHSS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 8.73/6.09 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 8.73/6.09 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2577261 completed with status 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 8.73/6.09 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 8.73/6.09 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 8.73/6.09 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 8.73/6.09 % Search class: FGHSS-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 8.73/6.09 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 8.73/6.09 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 8.73/6.09 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 8.73/6.09 % Preprocessing time : 0.176 s
% 8.73/6.09
% 8.73/6.09 % Proof found!
% 8.73/6.09 % SZS status Theorem
% 8.73/6.09 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.73/6.09 % Parsed axioms : 55590
% 8.73/6.09 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 53960
% 8.73/6.09 % Initial clauses : 2949
% 8.73/6.09 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 156
% 8.73/6.09 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2793
% 8.73/6.09 % Processed clauses : 1479
% 8.73/6.09 % ...of these trivial : 218
% 8.73/6.09 % ...subsumed : 20
% 8.73/6.09 % ...remaining for further processing : 1241
% 8.73/6.09 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 8.73/6.09 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Backward-subsumed : 41
% 8.73/6.09 % Backward-rewritten : 415
% 8.73/6.09 % Generated clauses : 8439
% 8.73/6.09 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8419
% 8.73/6.09 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 8.73/6.09 % Paramodulations : 8429
% 8.73/6.09 % Factorizations : 2
% 8.73/6.09 % NegExts : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Equation resolutions : 5
% 8.73/6.09 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Total rewrite steps : 654
% 8.73/6.09 % ...of those cached : 163
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional check models : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 8.73/6.09 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 8.73/6.09 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 8.73/6.09 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 8.73/6.09 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 8.73/6.09 % Current number of processed clauses : 779
% 8.73/6.09 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 456
% 8.73/6.09 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 8.73/6.09 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 8.73/6.09 % Non-unit-clauses : 320
% 8.73/6.09 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5940
% 8.73/6.09 % ...number of literals in the above : 17672
% 8.73/6.09 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Current number of archived clauses : 459
% 8.73/6.09 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20976
% 8.73/6.09 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19241
% 8.73/6.09 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 8.73/6.09 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16974
% 8.73/6.09 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 2223
% 8.73/6.09 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5911
% 8.73/6.09 % BW rewrite match successes : 2416
% 8.73/6.09 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Condensation successes : 0
% 8.73/6.09 % Termbank termtop insertions : 950587
% 8.73/6.09 % Search garbage collected termcells : 328984
% 8.73/6.09
% 8.73/6.09 % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.73/6.09 % User time : 1.150 s
% 8.73/6.09 % System time : 0.480 s
% 8.73/6.09 % Total time : 1.629 s
% 8.73/6.09 % Maximum resident set size: 138548 pages
% 8.73/6.09
% 8.73/6.09 % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.73/6.09 % User time : 4.661 s
% 8.73/6.09 % System time : 0.663 s
% 8.73/6.09 % Total time : 5.324 s
% 8.73/6.09 % Maximum resident set size: 63744 pages
% 8.73/6.09 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------