%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR089+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.98s 1.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 43 ( 24 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 108 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 13 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 118 ( 53 ~; 46 |; 10 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 2 sgn 23 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(local_5,axiom,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_5844,axiom,
! [X63,X64] :
( ( s__instance(X63,s__Object)
& s__instance(X64,s__Object) )
=> ( s__connected(X63,X64)
=> ( s__overlapsSpatially(X63,X64)
| s__meetsSpatially(X63,X64) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_5844) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_19017,axiom,
s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_19017) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7716,axiom,
! [X552,X551] :
( ( s__instance(X552,s__EngineeringComponent)
& s__instance(X551,s__EngineeringComponent) )
=> ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X551,X552)
<=> ? [X553] :
( s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X553,X551,X552)
& s__instance(X553,s__EngineeringConnection) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7716) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_166,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( s__instance(X15,s__EngineeringComponent)
& s__instance(X16,s__EngineeringComponent) )
=> ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X15,X16)
=> s__connected(X15,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_166) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X1288,X1289,X1290] :
( s__instance(X1290,X1289)
| ~ s__instance(X1290,X1288)
| ~ s__subclass(X1288,X1289)
| ~ s__instance(X1288,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1289,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1286,X1287] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1286,X1287)
| s__instance(X1287,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1286,X1287)
| s__instance(X1286,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X1234,X1235] :
( s__overlapsSpatially(X1234,X1235)
| s__meetsSpatially(X1234,X1235)
| ~ s__connected(X1234,X1235)
| ~ s__instance(X1234,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1235,s__Object) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_5844])])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_19017]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X1390,X1391,X1393] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X1390,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1391,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1391,X1390)
| ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1393,X1391,X1390)
| ~ s__instance(X1393,s__EngineeringConnection) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1390,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1391,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1391,X1390)
| s__connectsEngineeringComponents(esk9_2(X1390,X1391),X1391,X1390) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1390,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1391,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1391,X1390)
| s__instance(esk9_2(X1390,X1391),s__EngineeringConnection) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7716])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ s__connected(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| s__overlapsSpatially(X2,X1)
| s__meetsSpatially(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
fof(c_0_32,plain,
! [X1750,X1751] :
( s__connected(X1750,X1751)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1750,X1751)
| ~ s__instance(X1750,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1751,s__EngineeringComponent) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_166])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringConnection)
| s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object)
| ~ s__connected(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__connected(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
s__connectedEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_35])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
~ s__connected(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37])]),c_0_38])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_31]),c_0_30])]),c_0_41]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR089+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:51:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/1.74 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.98/1.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.98/1.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1351765 completed with status 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.98/1.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.98/1.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.98/1.74 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 0.98/1.74 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.98/1.74 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.98/1.74 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1351771 completed with status 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.98/1.74 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.98/1.74 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.98/1.74 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 0.98/1.74 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.98/1.74 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.98/1.74 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.98/1.74 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.98/1.74 % Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 0.98/1.74
% 0.98/1.74 % Proof found!
% 0.98/1.74 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.98/1.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.98/1.74 % Parsed axioms : 37987
% 0.98/1.74 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37525
% 0.98/1.74 % Initial clauses : 563
% 0.98/1.74 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.98/1.74 % Initial clauses in saturation : 556
% 0.98/1.74 % Processed clauses : 1816
% 0.98/1.74 % ...of these trivial : 204
% 0.98/1.74 % ...subsumed : 336
% 0.98/1.74 % ...remaining for further processing : 1276
% 0.98/1.74 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.98/1.74 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.98/1.74 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.98/1.74 % Generated clauses : 4251
% 0.98/1.74 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3870
% 0.98/1.74 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 56
% 0.98/1.74 % Paramodulations : 4250
% 0.98/1.74 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % NegExts : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.98/1.74 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Total rewrite steps : 702
% 0.98/1.74 % ...of those cached : 530
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.74 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.74 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.74 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.74 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.98/1.74 % Current number of processed clauses : 1263
% 0.98/1.74 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 300
% 0.98/1.74 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.98/1.74 % Non-unit-clauses : 960
% 0.98/1.74 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2609
% 0.98/1.74 % ...number of literals in the above : 8870
% 0.98/1.74 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.98/1.74 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 73240
% 0.98/1.74 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47478
% 0.98/1.74 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 395
% 0.98/1.74 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 859
% 0.98/1.74 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.98/1.74 % BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.98/1.74 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.98/1.74 % Termbank termtop insertions : 330964
% 0.98/1.74 % Search garbage collected termcells : 129566
% 0.98/1.74
% 0.98/1.74 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.98/1.74 % User time : 0.296 s
% 0.98/1.74 % System time : 0.145 s
% 0.98/1.74 % Total time : 0.441 s
% 0.98/1.74 % Maximum resident set size: 52068 pages
% 0.98/1.74
% 0.98/1.74 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.98/1.74 % User time : 1.733 s
% 0.98/1.74 % System time : 0.424 s
% 0.98/1.74 % Total time : 2.157 s
% 0.98/1.74 % Maximum resident set size: 31744 pages
% 0.98/1.74 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------