↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR089+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 10.85s 8.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  172 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   45 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  200 (  79   ~;  83   |;  26   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   24 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   9 sgn  38   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15] :
      ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
     => ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
    ! [X137,X12,X136] :
      ( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
    <=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
          ( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
            & s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
            & s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
         => ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
              & s__instance(X34,X137)
              & s__instance(X1138,X136) )
           => ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
                | s__instance(X1139,X136) )
              & s__instance(X34,X12)
              & s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_37524,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TelephoneLine,s__WireLine),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_37524) ).

fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15,X13] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X13,X1)
          & s__subclass(X1,X15) )
       => s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).

fof(local_5,axiom,
    ~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_33766,axiom,
    ! [X563,X564] :
      ( ( s__instance(X563,s__Object)
        & s__instance(X564,s__Object) )
     => ( s__connected(X563,X564)
       => ( s__overlapsSpatially(X563,X564)
          | s__meetsSpatially(X563,X564) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_33766) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_73208,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Object),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_73208) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_35641,axiom,
    ! [X1415,X1414] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1415,s__EngineeringComponent)
        & s__instance(X1414,s__EngineeringComponent) )
     => ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1414,X1415)
      <=> ? [X1416] :
            ( s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1416,X1414,X1415)
            & s__instance(X1416,s__EngineeringConnection) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_35641) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26864,axiom,
    ! [X548,X550] :
      ( ( s__instance(X548,s__EngineeringComponent)
        & s__instance(X550,s__EngineeringComponent) )
     => ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X548,X550)
       => s__connected(X548,X550) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26864) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X2520,X2521] :
      ( ( ~ s__subclass(X2520,X2521)
        | s__instance(X2521,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( ~ s__subclass(X2520,X2521)
        | s__instance(X2520,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X2624,X2625,X2626,X2627,X2628,X2629,X2630,X2631,X2632] :
      ( ( X2631 = s__UnionFn(X2632,X2630)
        | ~ s__instance(esk19_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2631)
        | ~ s__instance(esk18_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2631)
        | ~ s__instance(esk20_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2630) )
      & ( X2631 = s__UnionFn(X2632,X2630)
        | ~ s__instance(esk19_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2631)
        | ~ s__instance(esk18_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2631)
        | ~ s__instance(esk20_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2632) )
      & ( X2631 = s__UnionFn(X2632,X2630)
        | s__instance(esk20_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2631) )
      & ( X2631 = s__UnionFn(X2632,X2630)
        | s__instance(esk19_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2630) )
      & ( X2631 = s__UnionFn(X2632,X2630)
        | s__instance(esk18_3(X2630,X2631,X2632),X2632) )
      & ( X2631 = s__UnionFn(X2632,X2630)
        | s__instance(X2630,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( X2631 = s__UnionFn(X2632,X2630)
        | s__instance(X2631,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( X2631 = s__UnionFn(X2632,X2630)
        | s__instance(X2632,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( X2625 != s__UnionFn(X2626,X2624)
        | ~ s__instance(X2624,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2625,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2626,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2629,X2625)
        | ~ s__instance(X2628,X2624)
        | ~ s__instance(X2627,X2626)
        | s__instance(X2629,X2624)
        | s__instance(X2629,X2626) )
      & ( X2625 != s__UnionFn(X2626,X2624)
        | ~ s__instance(X2624,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2625,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2626,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2629,X2625)
        | ~ s__instance(X2628,X2624)
        | ~ s__instance(X2627,X2626)
        | s__instance(X2628,X2625) )
      & ( X2625 != s__UnionFn(X2626,X2624)
        | ~ s__instance(X2624,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2625,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2626,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2629,X2625)
        | ~ s__instance(X2628,X2624)
        | ~ s__instance(X2627,X2626)
        | s__instance(X2627,X2625) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TelephoneLine,s__WireLine),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_37524]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    s__instance(s__TelephoneLine,s__SetOrClass),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X2522,X2523,X2524] :
      ( s__instance(X2524,X2523)
      | ~ s__instance(X2524,X2522)
      | ~ s__subclass(X2522,X2523)
      | ~ s__instance(X2522,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X2523,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X2462,X2463] :
      ( s__overlapsSpatially(X2462,X2463)
      | s__meetsSpatially(X2462,X2463)
      | ~ s__connected(X2462,X2463)
      | ~ s__instance(X2462,s__Object)
      | ~ s__instance(X2463,s__Object) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_33766])])]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | s__instance(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Object),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_73208]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X2449,X2450,X2452] :
      ( ( ~ s__instance(X2449,s__EngineeringComponent)
        | ~ s__instance(X2450,s__EngineeringComponent)
        | s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2450,X2449)
        | ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X2452,X2450,X2449)
        | ~ s__instance(X2452,s__EngineeringConnection) )
      & ( ~ s__instance(X2449,s__EngineeringComponent)
        | ~ s__instance(X2450,s__EngineeringComponent)
        | ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2450,X2449)
        | s__connectsEngineeringComponents(esk11_2(X2449,X2450),X2450,X2449) )
      & ( ~ s__instance(X2449,s__EngineeringComponent)
        | ~ s__instance(X2450,s__EngineeringComponent)
        | ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2450,X2449)
        | s__instance(esk11_2(X2449,X2450),s__EngineeringConnection) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_35641])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ s__connected(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__Object)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
    | s__overlapsSpatially(X2,X1)
    | s__meetsSpatially(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

fof(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X2746,X2747] :
      ( s__connected(X2746,X2747)
      | ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2746,X2747)
      | ~ s__instance(X2746,s__EngineeringComponent)
      | ~ s__instance(X2747,s__EngineeringComponent) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26864])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X3,s__EngineeringComponent)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
    | ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringConnection)
    | s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object)
    | ~ s__connected(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
    | s__connected(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    s__connectedEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_43])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__connected(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45])]),c_0_46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_39]),c_0_38])]),c_0_49]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : CSR089+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.45  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:54:08 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.85/8.22  % Version: 3.5.1
% 10.85/8.22  % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 10.85/8.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1470s (5) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 294s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 294s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting sh5l with 294s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with pid 2840592 completed with status 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Result found by G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00
% 10.85/8.22  % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 10.85/8.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1470s (5) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 10.85/8.22  % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 10.85/8.22  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 10.85/8.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1470 seconds (1470 total)
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 133s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 148s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 133s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 133s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 133s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2840598 completed with status 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 10.85/8.22  % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 10.85/8.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1470s (5) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 10.85/8.22  % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 10.85/8.22  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 10.85/8.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1470 seconds (1470 total)
% 10.85/8.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 133s (1) cores
% 10.85/8.22  % Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 10.85/8.22  
% 10.85/8.22  % Proof found!
% 10.85/8.22  % SZS status Theorem
% 10.85/8.22  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.85/8.22  % Parsed axioms                        : 145107
% 10.85/8.22  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 144355
% 10.85/8.22  % Initial clauses                      : 863
% 10.85/8.22  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
% 10.85/8.22  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 849
% 10.85/8.22  % Processed clauses                    : 1761
% 10.85/8.22  % ...of these trivial                  : 178
% 10.85/8.22  % ...subsumed                          : 35
% 10.85/8.22  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1548
% 10.85/8.22  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 10.85/8.22  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Backward-subsumed                    : 57
% 10.85/8.22  % Backward-rewritten                   : 92
% 10.85/8.22  % Generated clauses                    : 5660
% 10.85/8.22  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4971
% 10.85/8.22  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 10.85/8.22  % Paramodulations                      : 5656
% 10.85/8.22  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 10.85/8.22  % NegExts                              : 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 10.85/8.22  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2178
% 10.85/8.22  % ...of those cached                   : 1658
% 10.85/8.22  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 10.85/8.22  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 10.85/8.22  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 10.85/8.22  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 10.85/8.22  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 10.85/8.22  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 10.85/8.22  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 10.85/8.22  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 10.85/8.22  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 10.85/8.22  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 10.85/8.22  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 10.85/8.22  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 10.85/8.22  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1397
% 10.85/8.22  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 585
% 10.85/8.22  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.85/8.22  %    Negative unit clauses             : 43
% 10.85/8.22  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 769
% 10.85/8.22  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1437
% 10.85/8.22  % ...number of literals in the above   : 5098
% 10.85/8.22  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Current number of archived clauses   : 149
% 10.85/8.22  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 56794
% 10.85/8.22  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39704
% 10.85/8.22  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 52
% 10.85/8.22  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4141
% 10.85/8.22  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 10.85/8.22  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 239
% 10.85/8.22  % BW rewrite match successes           : 88
% 10.85/8.22  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 10.85/8.22  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1088962
% 10.85/8.22  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 462382
% 10.85/8.22  
% 10.85/8.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 10.85/8.22  % User time                : 0.688 s
% 10.85/8.22  % System time              : 0.288 s
% 10.85/8.22  % Total time               : 0.976 s
% 10.85/8.22  % Maximum resident set size: 178160 pages
% 10.85/8.22  
% 10.85/8.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 10.85/8.22  % User time                : 7.498 s
% 10.85/8.22  % System time              : 0.945 s
% 10.85/8.22  % Total time               : 8.443 s
% 10.85/8.22  % Maximum resident set size: 104448 pages
% 10.85/8.22  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------