%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR089+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:43 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 77.77s 13.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 77.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 51 ( 28 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 120 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 13 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 126 ( 57 ~; 50 |; 10 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 2 sgn 23 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7582,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Artifact,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7582) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7660,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Device,s__Artifact),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7660) ).
fof(local_5,axiom,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7695,axiom,
s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Device),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7695) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_5844,axiom,
! [X63,X64] :
( ( s__instance(X63,s__Object)
& s__instance(X64,s__Object) )
=> ( s__connected(X63,X64)
=> ( s__overlapsSpatially(X63,X64)
| s__meetsSpatially(X63,X64) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_5844) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7716,axiom,
! [X552,X551] :
( ( s__instance(X552,s__EngineeringComponent)
& s__instance(X551,s__EngineeringComponent) )
=> ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X551,X552)
<=> ? [X553] :
( s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X553,X551,X552)
& s__instance(X553,s__EngineeringConnection) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7716) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_166,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( s__instance(X15,s__EngineeringComponent)
& s__instance(X16,s__EngineeringComponent) )
=> ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X15,X16)
=> s__connected(X15,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_166) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1265,X1266,X1267] :
( s__instance(X1267,X1266)
| ~ s__instance(X1267,X1265)
| ~ s__subclass(X1265,X1266)
| ~ s__instance(X1265,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1266,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X1263,X1264] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1263,X1264)
| s__instance(X1264,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1263,X1264)
| s__instance(X1263,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__subclass(s__Artifact,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7582]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__subclass(s__Device,s__Artifact),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7660]) ).
fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Artifact)
| s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Device)
| s__instance(X1,s__Artifact) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Device),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7695]) ).
fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X1238,X1239] :
( s__overlapsSpatially(X1238,X1239)
| s__meetsSpatially(X1238,X1239)
| ~ s__connected(X1238,X1239)
| ~ s__instance(X1238,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1239,s__Object) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_5844])])]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Device)
| s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Device) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_27]) ).
fof(c_0_33,plain,
! [X1712,X1713,X1715] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X1712,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1713,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1713,X1712)
| ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1715,X1713,X1712)
| ~ s__instance(X1715,s__EngineeringConnection) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1712,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1713,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1713,X1712)
| s__connectsEngineeringComponents(esk43_2(X1712,X1713),X1713,X1712) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1712,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1713,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1713,X1712)
| s__instance(esk43_2(X1712,X1713),s__EngineeringConnection) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7716])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ s__connected(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| s__overlapsSpatially(X2,X1)
| s__meetsSpatially(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
fof(c_0_40,plain,
! [X1282,X1283] :
( s__connected(X1282,X1283)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1282,X1283)
| ~ s__instance(X1282,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1283,s__EngineeringComponent) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_166])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringConnection)
| s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object)
| ~ s__connected(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__connected(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
s__connectedEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_43])]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
~ s__connected(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45])]),c_0_46])]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_39]),c_0_38])]),c_0_49]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR089+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:49:43 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 77.77/13.22 % Version: 3.5.1
% 77.77/13.22 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 77.77/13.22 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % sh5l with pid 2580174 completed with status 0
% 77.77/13.22 % Result found by sh5l
% 77.77/13.22 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 77.77/13.22 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 77.77/13.22 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 77.77/13.22 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 77.77/13.22 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 77.77/13.22 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.22 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2580178 completed with status 0
% 77.77/13.22 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 77.77/13.23 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 77.77/13.23 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 77.77/13.23 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 77.77/13.23 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.23 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.23 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.23 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 77.77/13.23 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 77.77/13.23 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 77.77/13.23 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 77.77/13.23 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 77.77/13.23 % Preprocessing time : 0.148 s
% 77.77/13.23
% 77.77/13.23 % Proof found!
% 77.77/13.23 % SZS status Theorem
% 77.77/13.23 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 77.77/13.23 % Parsed axioms : 16754
% 77.77/13.23 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 12792
% 77.77/13.23 % Initial clauses : 5439
% 77.77/13.23 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 60
% 77.77/13.23 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5379
% 77.77/13.23 % Processed clauses : 18481
% 77.77/13.23 % ...of these trivial : 1132
% 77.77/13.23 % ...subsumed : 1871
% 77.77/13.23 % ...remaining for further processing : 15478
% 77.77/13.23 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 41
% 77.77/13.23 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Backward-subsumed : 191
% 77.77/13.23 % Backward-rewritten : 784
% 77.77/13.23 % Generated clauses : 38212
% 77.77/13.23 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 34427
% 77.77/13.23 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 429
% 77.77/13.23 % Paramodulations : 38162
% 77.77/13.23 % Factorizations : 9
% 77.77/13.23 % NegExts : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Equation resolutions : 43
% 77.77/13.23 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Total rewrite steps : 10533
% 77.77/13.23 % ...of those cached : 8382
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional check models : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 77.77/13.23 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 77.77/13.23 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 77.77/13.23 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 77.77/13.23 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 77.77/13.23 % Current number of processed clauses : 14469
% 77.77/13.23 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4498
% 77.77/13.23 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 77.77/13.23 % Negative unit clauses : 16
% 77.77/13.23 % Non-unit-clauses : 9950
% 77.77/13.23 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20514
% 77.77/13.23 % ...number of literals in the above : 94513
% 77.77/13.23 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Current number of archived clauses : 975
% 77.77/13.23 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18515698
% 77.77/13.23 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10840706
% 77.77/13.23 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2299
% 77.77/13.23 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4335878
% 77.77/13.23 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 95
% 77.77/13.23 % BW rewrite match attempts : 80642
% 77.77/13.23 % BW rewrite match successes : 461
% 77.77/13.23 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Condensation successes : 0
% 77.77/13.23 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1080450
% 77.77/13.23 % Search garbage collected termcells : 137104
% 77.77/13.23
% 77.77/13.23 % -------------------------------------------------
% 77.77/13.23 % User time : 11.632 s
% 77.77/13.23 % System time : 0.269 s
% 77.77/13.23 % Total time : 11.901 s
% 77.77/13.23 % Maximum resident set size: 52888 pages
% 77.77/13.23
% 77.77/13.23 % -------------------------------------------------
% 77.77/13.23 % User time : 12.140 s
% 77.77/13.23 % System time : 0.307 s
% 77.77/13.23 % Total time : 12.447 s
% 77.77/13.23 % Maximum resident set size: 22016 pages
% 77.77/13.23 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------