%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR089+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 82.97s 14.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 82.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 53 ( 32 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 119 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 13 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 120 ( 54 ~; 47 |; 10 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 2 sgn 23 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7716,axiom,
! [X552,X551] :
( ( s__instance(X552,s__EngineeringComponent)
& s__instance(X551,s__EngineeringComponent) )
=> ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X551,X552)
<=> ? [X553] :
( s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X553,X551,X552)
& s__instance(X553,s__EngineeringConnection) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7716) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7695,axiom,
s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Device),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7695) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_166,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( s__instance(X15,s__EngineeringComponent)
& s__instance(X16,s__EngineeringComponent) )
=> ( s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X15,X16)
=> s__connected(X15,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_166) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(local_5,axiom,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7660,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Device,s__Artifact),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7660) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_5844,axiom,
! [X63,X64] :
( ( s__instance(X63,s__Object)
& s__instance(X64,s__Object) )
=> ( s__connected(X63,X64)
=> ( s__overlapsSpatially(X63,X64)
| s__meetsSpatially(X63,X64) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_5844) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7582,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Artifact,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7582) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1265,X1266,X1267] :
( s__instance(X1267,X1266)
| ~ s__instance(X1267,X1265)
| ~ s__subclass(X1265,X1266)
| ~ s__instance(X1265,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1266,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X1263,X1264] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1263,X1264)
| s__instance(X1264,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1263,X1264)
| s__instance(X1263,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X1712,X1713,X1715] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X1712,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1713,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1713,X1712)
| ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1715,X1713,X1712)
| ~ s__instance(X1715,s__EngineeringConnection) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1712,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1713,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1713,X1712)
| s__connectsEngineeringComponents(esk43_2(X1712,X1713),X1713,X1712) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1712,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1713,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1713,X1712)
| s__instance(esk43_2(X1712,X1713),s__EngineeringConnection) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7716])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__subclass(s__EngineeringComponent,s__Device),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7695]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X1282,X1283] :
( s__connected(X1282,X1283)
| ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X1282,X1283)
| ~ s__instance(X1282,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1283,s__EngineeringComponent) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_166])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__connectsEngineeringComponents(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringConnection)
| s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__connectsEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_1,s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__EngineeringComponent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__EngineeringComponent),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_1,s__EngineeringConnection),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
fof(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__subclass(s__Device,s__Artifact),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7660]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__instance(X1,s__Device) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_33,plain,
! [X1238,X1239] :
( s__overlapsSpatially(X1238,X1239)
| s__meetsSpatially(X1238,X1239)
| ~ s__connected(X1238,X1239)
| ~ s__instance(X1238,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1239,s__Object) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_5844])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ s__connectedEngineeringComponents(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__EngineeringComponent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__EngineeringComponent)
| s__connected(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__connectedEngineeringComponents(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).
fof(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_37,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
s__subclass(s__Artifact,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7582]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Device)
| s__instance(X1,s__Artifact) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Device),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ s__connected(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| s__overlapsSpatially(X2,X1)
| s__meetsSpatially(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
s__connected(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_27]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
~ s__overlapsSpatially(s__Object16_2,s__Object16_3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Artifact)
| s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Artifact),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Device),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43]),c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_3,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Artifact),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Object16_2,s__Object),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49])]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_50]),c_0_51]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR089+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.56 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.56 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.56 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.56 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.56 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.56 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.56 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.56 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:52:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.56 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.56 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.60 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.60 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 82.97/14.36 % Version: 3.5.1
% 82.97/14.36 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 82.97/14.36 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1353369 completed with status 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 82.97/14.36 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 82.97/14.36 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 82.97/14.36 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 82.97/14.36 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 82.97/14.36 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % new_bool_1 with pid 1353411 completed with status 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 82.97/14.36 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 82.97/14.36 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 82.97/14.36 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 82.97/14.36 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 82.97/14.36 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 82.97/14.36 % Preprocessing time : 0.166 s
% 82.97/14.36 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 82.97/14.36
% 82.97/14.36 % Proof found!
% 82.97/14.36 % SZS status Theorem
% 82.97/14.36 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 82.97/14.36 % Parsed axioms : 16754
% 82.97/14.36 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 12792
% 82.97/14.36 % Initial clauses : 5439
% 82.97/14.36 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 60
% 82.97/14.36 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5379
% 82.97/14.36 % Processed clauses : 17967
% 82.97/14.36 % ...of these trivial : 744
% 82.97/14.36 % ...subsumed : 2026
% 82.97/14.36 % ...remaining for further processing : 15196
% 82.97/14.36 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 79
% 82.97/14.36 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Backward-subsumed : 11
% 82.97/14.36 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 82.97/14.36 % Generated clauses : 33141
% 82.97/14.36 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28952
% 82.97/14.36 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 427
% 82.97/14.36 % Paramodulations : 33054
% 82.97/14.36 % Factorizations : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % NegExts : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Equation resolutions : 98
% 82.97/14.36 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Total rewrite steps : 9701
% 82.97/14.36 % ...of those cached : 7800
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional unsat checks : 4
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional check models : 3
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional encoding time : 0.156
% 82.97/14.36 % Propositional solver time : 0.177
% 82.97/14.36 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 82.97/14.36 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 82.97/14.36 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 82.97/14.36 % Current number of processed clauses : 9865
% 82.97/14.36 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4204
% 82.97/14.36 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 155
% 82.97/14.36 % Negative unit clauses : 25
% 82.97/14.36 % Non-unit-clauses : 5481
% 82.97/14.36 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21591
% 82.97/14.36 % ...number of literals in the above : 45153
% 82.97/14.36 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Current number of archived clauses : 5263
% 82.97/14.36 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9978154
% 82.97/14.36 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2764465
% 82.97/14.36 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1721
% 82.97/14.36 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2064026
% 82.97/14.36 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 2100
% 82.97/14.36 % BW rewrite match attempts : 873
% 82.97/14.36 % BW rewrite match successes : 527
% 82.97/14.36 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Condensation successes : 0
% 82.97/14.36 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1247626
% 82.97/14.36 % Search garbage collected termcells : 137104
% 82.97/14.36
% 82.97/14.36 % -------------------------------------------------
% 82.97/14.36 % User time : 12.633 s
% 82.97/14.36 % System time : 0.330 s
% 82.97/14.36 % Total time : 12.963 s
% 82.97/14.36 % Maximum resident set size: 52888 pages
% 82.97/14.36
% 82.97/14.36 % -------------------------------------------------
% 82.97/14.36 % User time : 57.166 s
% 82.97/14.36 % System time : 1.454 s
% 82.97/14.36 % Total time : 58.620 s
% 82.97/14.36 % Maximum resident set size: 22272 pages
% 82.97/14.36 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------