%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR089+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:43 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 12.31s 6.99s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn 2 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341,X2342] : s__meetsSpatially(X2341,X2342),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_2983,axiom,
s__meetsSpatially(s__Texas,s__Mexico),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_2983) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341,X2342] : s__meetsSpatially(X2341,X2342),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343,X2344] : ~ s__meetsSpatially(X2343,X2344),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
s__meetsSpatially(s__Texas,s__Mexico),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_2983]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__meetsSpatially(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR089+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.46 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:57:23 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.31/6.99 % Version: 3.5.1
% 12.31/6.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 12.31/6.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % sh5l with pid 1728077 completed with status 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Result found by sh5l
% 12.31/6.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 12.31/6.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 12.31/6.99 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 12.31/6.99 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 12.31/6.99 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 296 seconds (296 total)
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1728117 completed with status 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 12.31/6.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 12.31/6.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 12.31/6.99 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 12.31/6.99 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 12.31/6.99 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 296 seconds (296 total)
% 12.31/6.99 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 12.31/6.99 % Preprocessing time : 0.331 s
% 12.31/6.99
% 12.31/6.99 % Proof found!
% 12.31/6.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 12.31/6.99 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.31/6.99 % Parsed axioms : 55592
% 12.31/6.99 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 50982
% 12.31/6.99 % Initial clauses : 7487
% 12.31/6.99 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 330
% 12.31/6.99 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7157
% 12.31/6.99 % Processed clauses : 1908
% 12.31/6.99 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % ...subsumed : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % ...remaining for further processing : 1908
% 12.31/6.99 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 12.31/6.99 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Generated clauses : 62
% 12.31/6.99 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Paramodulations : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Factorizations : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % NegExts : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 12.31/6.99 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 12.31/6.99 % ...of those cached : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional check models : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 12.31/6.99 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 12.31/6.99 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 12.31/6.99 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 12.31/6.99 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 12.31/6.99 % Current number of processed clauses : 1846
% 12.31/6.99 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1841
% 12.31/6.99 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 12.31/6.99 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5249
% 12.31/6.99 % ...number of literals in the above : 27873
% 12.31/6.99 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Current number of archived clauses : 61
% 12.31/6.99 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 12.31/6.99 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Condensation successes : 0
% 12.31/6.99 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1269414
% 12.31/6.99 % Search garbage collected termcells : 379092
% 12.31/6.99
% 12.31/6.99 % -------------------------------------------------
% 12.31/6.99 % User time : 1.879 s
% 12.31/6.99 % System time : 0.442 s
% 12.31/6.99 % Total time : 2.321 s
% 12.31/6.99 % Maximum resident set size: 142448 pages
% 12.31/6.99
% 12.31/6.99 % -------------------------------------------------
% 12.31/6.99 % User time : 5.440 s
% 12.31/6.99 % System time : 0.618 s
% 12.31/6.99 % Total time : 6.058 s
% 12.31/6.99 % Maximum resident set size: 63744 pages
% 12.31/6.99 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------