%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR091+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.63s 1.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 41 ( 19 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 108 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 118 ( 51 ~; 50 |; 12 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 2 sgn 15 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6568,axiom,
! [X385,X92] :
( ( s__instance(X385,s__Object)
& s__instance(X92,s__Process) )
=> ( ( s__patient(X92,X385)
& s__instance(X92,s__TherapeuticProcess) )
=> ( ? [X290] :
( s__part(X385,X290)
& s__instance(X290,s__Organism)
& s__instance(X290,s__Object) )
| s__instance(X385,s__Organism) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_6568) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__OrganicObject),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__patient(s__Proc18_1,s__Bio18_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__TherapeuticProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_11965,axiom,
s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_11965) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
? [X1223] :
( s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1223)
& s__instance(X1223,s__Organism) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_15377,axiom,
s__subclass(s__TherapeuticProcess,s__Process),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_15377) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1233,X1234,X1235] :
( s__instance(X1235,X1234)
| ~ s__instance(X1235,X1233)
| ~ s__subclass(X1233,X1234)
| ~ s__instance(X1233,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1234,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X1231,X1232] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1231,X1232)
| s__instance(X1232,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1231,X1232)
| s__instance(X1231,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X1292,X1293] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X1292,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X1293,X1292)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1292,s__Organism)
| s__part(X1292,esk2_2(X1292,X1293)) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1292,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X1293,X1292)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1292,s__Organism)
| s__instance(esk2_2(X1292,X1293),s__Organism) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1292,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X1293,X1292)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1292,s__Organism)
| s__instance(esk2_2(X1292,X1293),s__Object) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6568])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__OrganicObject),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
| s__part(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__patient(s__Proc18_1,s__Bio18_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__TherapeuticProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,X1)
| s__instance(s__Bio18_1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_11965]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
| s__instance(esk2_2(X1,X2),s__Organism) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1223] :
( s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1223)
& s__instance(X1223,s__Organism) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__Process)
| s__part(s__Bio18_1,esk2_2(s__Bio18_1,s__Proc18_1)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(s__TherapeuticProcess,X1)
| s__instance(s__Proc18_1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__subclass(s__TherapeuticProcess,s__Process),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_15377]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__Process)
| s__instance(esk2_2(s__Bio18_1,s__Proc18_1),s__Organism) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
! [X1224] :
( ~ s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1224)
| ~ s__instance(X1224,s__Organism) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__Process)
| s__part(s__Bio18_1,esk2_2(s__Bio18_1,s__Proc18_1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__Process),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__Process)
| s__instance(esk2_2(s__Bio18_1,s__Proc18_1),s__Organism) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
s__part(s__Bio18_1,esk2_2(s__Bio18_1,s__Proc18_1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__instance(esk2_2(s__Bio18_1,s__Proc18_1),s__Organism),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_35])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR091+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:54:28 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.63/1.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.63/1.60 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.63/1.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2029255 completed with status 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 2.63/1.60 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.63/1.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.63/1.60 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 2.63/1.60 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.63/1.60 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % new_bool_3 with pid 2029268 completed with status 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 2.63/1.60 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.63/1.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.63/1.60 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 2.63/1.60 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.63/1.60 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.63/1.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 2.63/1.60 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.63/1.60
% 2.63/1.60 % Proof found!
% 2.63/1.60 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.63/1.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.63/1.60 % Parsed axioms : 37986
% 2.63/1.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37834
% 2.63/1.60 % Initial clauses : 168
% 2.63/1.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 2.63/1.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 164
% 2.63/1.60 % Processed clauses : 712
% 2.63/1.60 % ...of these trivial : 182
% 2.63/1.60 % ...subsumed : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 529
% 2.63/1.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 2.63/1.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 2.63/1.60 % Generated clauses : 1184
% 2.63/1.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 997
% 2.63/1.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 14
% 2.63/1.60 % Paramodulations : 1183
% 2.63/1.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % NegExts : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 2.63/1.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Total rewrite steps : 418
% 2.63/1.60 % ...of those cached : 301
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.63/1.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.63/1.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.63/1.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.63/1.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.63/1.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 361
% 2.63/1.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 196
% 2.63/1.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 2.63/1.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 164
% 2.63/1.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 607
% 2.63/1.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 830
% 2.63/1.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 167
% 2.63/1.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1882
% 2.63/1.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1305
% 2.63/1.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 2.63/1.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 283
% 2.63/1.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 2.63/1.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 2.63/1.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.63/1.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 265437
% 2.63/1.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 125842
% 2.63/1.60
% 2.63/1.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.63/1.60 % User time : 0.175 s
% 2.63/1.60 % System time : 0.085 s
% 2.63/1.60 % Total time : 0.260 s
% 2.63/1.60 % Maximum resident set size: 52068 pages
% 2.63/1.60
% 2.63/1.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.63/1.60 % User time : 1.151 s
% 2.63/1.60 % System time : 0.286 s
% 2.63/1.60 % Total time : 1.437 s
% 2.63/1.60 % Maximum resident set size: 31488 pages
% 2.63/1.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------