%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR091+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 1.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 107 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 126 ( 57 ~; 52 |; 12 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 2 sgn 15 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
? [X1223] :
( s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1223)
& s__instance(X1223,s__Organism) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_6568,axiom,
! [X385,X92] :
( ( s__instance(X385,s__Object)
& s__instance(X92,s__Process) )
=> ( ( s__patient(X92,X385)
& s__instance(X92,s__TherapeuticProcess) )
=> ( ? [X290] :
( s__part(X385,X290)
& s__instance(X290,s__Organism)
& s__instance(X290,s__Object) )
| s__instance(X385,s__Organism) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_6568) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_15377,axiom,
s__subclass(s__TherapeuticProcess,s__Process),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_15377) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__patient(s__Proc18_1,s__Bio18_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__TherapeuticProcess),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_11965,axiom,
s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_11965) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__OrganicObject),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1223] :
( s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1223)
& s__instance(X1223,s__Organism) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X1224] :
( ~ s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1224)
| ~ s__instance(X1224,s__Organism) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X1292,X1293] :
( ( ~ s__instance(X1292,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X1293,X1292)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1292,s__Organism)
| s__part(X1292,esk2_2(X1292,X1293)) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1292,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X1293,X1292)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1292,s__Organism)
| s__instance(esk2_2(X1292,X1293),s__Organism) )
& ( ~ s__instance(X1292,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X1293,X1292)
| ~ s__instance(X1293,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1292,s__Organism)
| s__instance(esk2_2(X1292,X1293),s__Object) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_6568])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X1233,X1234,X1235] :
( s__instance(X1235,X1234)
| ~ s__instance(X1235,X1233)
| ~ s__subclass(X1233,X1234)
| ~ s__instance(X1233,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1234,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X1231,X1232] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X1231,X1232)
| s__instance(X1232,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X1231,X1232)
| s__instance(X1231,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
| s__part(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Process)
| ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_2(s__Bio18_1,X1),s__Organism)
| ~ s__patient(X1,s__Bio18_1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Process)
| ~ s__patient(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
| s__instance(esk2_2(X1,X2),s__Organism) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__subclass(s__TherapeuticProcess,s__Process),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_15377]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Process)
| ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__patient(X1,s__Bio18_1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
s__patient(s__Proc18_1,s__Bio18_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__TherapeuticProcess),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TherapeuticProcess)
| s__instance(X1,s__Process) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,s__Object),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_11965]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__Process)
| ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Object) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__Process),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__OrganicObject)
| s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__OrganicObject),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Object),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR091+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:54:28 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/1.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/1.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/1.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2029260 completed with status 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.16/1.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/1.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/1.61 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 0.16/1.61 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/1.61 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2029273 completed with status 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.16/1.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/1.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/1.61 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 0.16/1.61 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/1.61 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/1.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.16/1.61 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/1.61
% 0.16/1.61 % Proof found!
% 0.16/1.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/1.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/1.61 % Parsed axioms : 37986
% 0.16/1.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37834
% 0.16/1.61 % Initial clauses : 168
% 0.16/1.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.16/1.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 164
% 0.16/1.61 % Processed clauses : 740
% 0.16/1.61 % ...of these trivial : 183
% 0.16/1.61 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.16/1.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 551
% 0.16/1.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.16/1.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.16/1.61 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.16/1.61 % Generated clauses : 764
% 0.16/1.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 602
% 0.16/1.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 14
% 0.16/1.61 % Paramodulations : 763
% 0.16/1.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.16/1.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Total rewrite steps : 281
% 0.16/1.61 % ...of those cached : 239
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/1.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/1.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/1.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/1.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/1.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 385
% 0.16/1.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 187
% 0.16/1.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/1.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 196
% 0.16/1.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 184
% 0.16/1.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 418
% 0.16/1.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 165
% 0.16/1.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2391
% 0.16/1.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1758
% 0.16/1.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 21
% 0.16/1.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 316
% 0.16/1.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.16/1.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.16/1.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/1.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 261621
% 0.16/1.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 125842
% 0.16/1.61
% 0.16/1.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/1.61 % User time : 0.197 s
% 0.16/1.61 % System time : 0.105 s
% 0.16/1.61 % Total time : 0.303 s
% 0.16/1.61 % Maximum resident set size: 52068 pages
% 0.16/1.61
% 0.16/1.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/1.61 % User time : 1.184 s
% 0.16/1.61 % System time : 0.305 s
% 0.16/1.61 % Total time : 1.489 s
% 0.16/1.61 % Maximum resident set size: 31744 pages
% 0.16/1.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------