↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR091+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.53s 11.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  29 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  112 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  114 (  50   ~;  47   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   2 sgn  15   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15] :
      ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
     => ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15,X13] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X13,X1)
          & s__subclass(X1,X15) )
       => s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_63553,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,s__Physical),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_63553) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27381,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__SelfConnectedObject,s__Object),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27381) ).

fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ? [X2341] :
      ( s__part(s__Bio18_1,X2341)
      & s__instance(X2341,s__Organism) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_63555,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,s__Object),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_63555) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_34493,axiom,
    ! [X1277,X203] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1277,s__Object)
        & s__instance(X203,s__Process) )
     => ( ( s__patient(X203,X1277)
          & s__instance(X203,s__TherapeuticProcess) )
       => ( ? [X308] :
              ( s__part(X1277,X308)
              & s__instance(X308,s__Organism)
              & s__instance(X308,s__Object) )
          | s__instance(X1277,s__Organism) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_34493) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__OrganicObject),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_43233,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Circumision,s__TherapeuticProcess),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_43233) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_62057,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Process,s__Entity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_62057) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_68263,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TherapeuticProcess,s__Process),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_68263) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__TherapeuticProcess),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__patient(s__Proc18_1,s__Bio18_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X2374,X2375] :
      ( ( ~ s__subclass(X2374,X2375)
        | s__instance(X2375,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( ~ s__subclass(X2374,X2375)
        | s__instance(X2374,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X2376,X2377,X2378] :
      ( s__instance(X2378,X2377)
      | ~ s__instance(X2378,X2376)
      | ~ s__subclass(X2376,X2377)
      | ~ s__instance(X2376,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X2377,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,s__Physical),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_63553]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    s__subclass(s__SelfConnectedObject,s__Object),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27381]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2341] :
        ( s__part(s__Bio18_1,X2341)
        & s__instance(X2341,s__Organism) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    s__subclass(s__OrganicObject,s__Object),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_63555]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    s__instance(s__OrganicObject,s__SetOrClass),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    s__instance(s__Object,s__SetOrClass),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2342] :
      ( ~ s__part(s__Bio18_1,X2342)
      | ~ s__instance(X2342,s__Organism) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X2474,X2475] :
      ( ( ~ s__instance(X2474,s__Object)
        | ~ s__instance(X2475,s__Process)
        | ~ s__patient(X2475,X2474)
        | ~ s__instance(X2475,s__TherapeuticProcess)
        | s__instance(X2474,s__Organism)
        | s__part(X2474,esk5_2(X2474,X2475)) )
      & ( ~ s__instance(X2474,s__Object)
        | ~ s__instance(X2475,s__Process)
        | ~ s__patient(X2475,X2474)
        | ~ s__instance(X2475,s__TherapeuticProcess)
        | s__instance(X2474,s__Organism)
        | s__instance(esk5_2(X2474,X2475),s__Organism) )
      & ( ~ s__instance(X2474,s__Object)
        | ~ s__instance(X2475,s__Process)
        | ~ s__patient(X2475,X2474)
        | ~ s__instance(X2475,s__TherapeuticProcess)
        | s__instance(X2474,s__Organism)
        | s__instance(esk5_2(X2474,X2475),s__Object) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_34493])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__OrganicObject)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Object) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__OrganicObject),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Circumision,s__TherapeuticProcess),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_43233]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Process,s__Entity),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_62057]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__part(s__Bio18_1,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__Process)
    | ~ s__patient(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TherapeuticProcess)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
    | s__part(X1,esk5_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Object),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ~ s__instance(s__Bio18_1,s__Organism),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TherapeuticProcess,s__Process),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_68263]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    s__instance(s__TherapeuticProcess,s__SetOrClass),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    s__instance(s__Process,s__SetOrClass),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TherapeuticProcess)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Process)
    | ~ s__instance(esk5_2(s__Bio18_1,X1),s__Organism)
    | ~ s__patient(X1,s__Bio18_1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__Process)
    | ~ s__patient(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TherapeuticProcess)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
    | s__instance(esk5_2(X1,X2),s__Organism) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TherapeuticProcess)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Process) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__TherapeuticProcess),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TherapeuticProcess)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Process)
    | ~ s__patient(X1,s__Bio18_1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_35])]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    s__patient(s__Proc18_1,s__Bio18_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    s__instance(s__Proc18_1,s__Process),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46]),c_0_43])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR091+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:55:22 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.53/11.69  % Version: 3.5.1
% 8.53/11.69  % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 8.53/11.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1475s (5) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting new_bool_3 with 295s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting new_bool_1 with 295s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting sh5l with 295s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with pid 3199195 completed with status 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Result found by G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00
% 8.53/11.69  % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 8.53/11.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1475s (5) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.53/11.69  % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 8.53/11.69  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 8.53/11.69  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 8.53/11.69  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1475 seconds (1475 total)
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 133s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 148s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 133s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 133s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 133s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with pid 3199202 completed with status 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Result found by G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00
% 8.53/11.69  % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 8.53/11.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1475s (5) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.53/11.69  % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 8.53/11.69  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 8.53/11.69  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 8.53/11.69  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1475 seconds (1475 total)
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 133s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 148s (1) cores
% 8.53/11.69  % Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 8.53/11.69  
% 8.53/11.69  % Proof found!
% 8.53/11.69  % SZS status Theorem
% 8.53/11.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.53/11.69  % Parsed axioms                        : 145106
% 8.53/11.69  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 144822
% 8.53/11.69  % Initial clauses                      : 318
% 8.53/11.69  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 8.53/11.69  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 313
% 8.53/11.69  % Processed clauses                    : 870
% 8.53/11.69  % ...of these trivial                  : 195
% 8.53/11.69  % ...subsumed                          : 68
% 8.53/11.69  % ...remaining for further processing  : 607
% 8.53/11.69  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 8.53/11.69  % Backward-rewritten                   : 48
% 8.53/11.69  % Generated clauses                    : 1451
% 8.53/11.69  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1380
% 8.53/11.69  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Paramodulations                      : 1451
% 8.53/11.69  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % NegExts                              : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1685
% 8.53/11.69  % ...of those cached                   : 1568
% 8.53/11.69  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.53/11.69  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 8.53/11.69  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.53/11.69  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 8.53/11.69  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.53/11.69  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 8.53/11.69  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 8.53/11.69  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 8.53/11.69  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 8.53/11.69  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 8.53/11.69  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 8.53/11.69  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 8.53/11.69  % Current number of processed clauses  : 558
% 8.53/11.69  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 254
% 8.53/11.69  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.53/11.69  %    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 8.53/11.69  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 297
% 8.53/11.69  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 822
% 8.53/11.69  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3209
% 8.53/11.69  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Current number of archived clauses   : 49
% 8.53/11.69  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6015
% 8.53/11.69  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4228
% 8.53/11.69  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 69
% 8.53/11.69  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 325
% 8.53/11.69  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 8.53/11.69  % BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 8.53/11.69  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.53/11.69  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1028215
% 8.53/11.69  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 460273
% 8.53/11.69  
% 8.53/11.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.53/11.69  % User time                : 0.626 s
% 8.53/11.69  % System time              : 0.273 s
% 8.53/11.69  % Total time               : 0.899 s
% 8.53/11.69  % Maximum resident set size: 178160 pages
% 8.53/11.69  
% 8.53/11.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.53/11.69  % User time                : 5.999 s
% 8.53/11.69  % System time              : 0.621 s
% 8.53/11.69  % Total time               : 6.620 s
% 8.53/11.69  % Maximum resident set size: 104704 pages
% 8.53/11.69  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------