%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.42s 0.85s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 84 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 87 ( 39 ~; 33 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 2 sgn 19 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
? [X591] :
( X591 = s__Ancestor22_1
& s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,X591) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_125,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( s__instance(X15,s__Organism)
& s__instance(X16,s__Organism) )
=> ( s__son(X15,X16)
=> s__parent(X15,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_125) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_97,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( s__instance(X15,s__Organism)
& s__instance(X16,s__Organism) )
=> ( s__parent(X15,X16)
=> s__ancestor(X15,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_97) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__son(s__Man22_1,s__Ancestor22_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(kb_SUMOcache_6056,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Organism),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+3.ax',kb_SUMOcache_6056) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(kb_SUMOcache_4867,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Man,s__Organism),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+3.ax',kb_SUMOcache_4867) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Man),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X591] :
( X591 = s__Ancestor22_1
& s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,X591) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X702,X703,X704] :
( s__instance(X704,X703)
| ~ s__instance(X704,X702)
| ~ s__subclass(X702,X703)
| ~ s__instance(X702,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X703,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X700,X701] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X700,X701)
| s__instance(X701,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X700,X701)
| s__instance(X700,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
! [X592] :
( X592 != s__Ancestor22_1
| ~ s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,X592) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X614,X615] :
( s__parent(X614,X615)
| ~ s__son(X614,X615)
| ~ s__instance(X614,s__Organism)
| ~ s__instance(X615,s__Organism) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_125])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != s__Ancestor22_1
| ~ s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X595,X596] :
( s__ancestor(X595,X596)
| ~ s__parent(X595,X596)
| ~ s__instance(X595,s__Organism)
| ~ s__instance(X596,s__Organism) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_97])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__son(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Organism)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
| s__parent(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
s__son(s__Man22_1,s__Ancestor22_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__Organism),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMOcache_6056]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,s__Ancestor22_1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ s__parent(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__Organism)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
| s__ancestor(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Organism)
| ~ s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Organism)
| s__parent(s__Man22_1,s__Ancestor22_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
| s__instance(X1,s__Organism) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Human),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__subclass(s__Man,s__Organism),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMOcache_4867]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Organism)
| ~ s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Organism) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Organism),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Man)
| s__instance(X1,s__Organism) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Man),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Organism),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:57:39 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.85 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.42/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % new_bool_1 with pid 2549788 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.42/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.42/0.85 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.42/0.85 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.85 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.85 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2549790 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.42/0.85 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.42/0.85 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.42/0.85 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.85 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.85 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.42/0.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.85 % Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.42/0.85
% 0.42/0.85 % Proof found!
% 0.42/0.85 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.85 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.85 % Parsed axioms : 14791
% 0.42/0.85 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14395
% 0.42/0.85 % Initial clauses : 418
% 0.42/0.85 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.42/0.85 % Initial clauses in saturation : 414
% 0.42/0.85 % Processed clauses : 857
% 0.42/0.85 % ...of these trivial : 199
% 0.42/0.85 % ...subsumed : 10
% 0.42/0.85 % ...remaining for further processing : 648
% 0.42/0.85 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.42/0.85 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.42/0.85 % Backward-rewritten : 12
% 0.42/0.85 % Generated clauses : 750
% 0.42/0.85 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 627
% 0.42/0.85 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 14
% 0.42/0.85 % Paramodulations : 747
% 0.42/0.85 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % NegExts : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.42/0.85 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Total rewrite steps : 374
% 0.42/0.85 % ...of those cached : 304
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.85 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.85 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.85 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.85 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.85 % Current number of processed clauses : 632
% 0.42/0.85 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 292
% 0.42/0.85 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.42/0.85 % Non-unit-clauses : 338
% 0.42/0.85 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 184
% 0.42/0.85 % ...number of literals in the above : 588
% 0.42/0.85 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.42/0.85 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17751
% 0.42/0.85 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12735
% 0.42/0.85 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26
% 0.42/0.85 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 283
% 0.42/0.85 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 0.42/0.85 % BW rewrite match successes : 12
% 0.42/0.85 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.42/0.85 % Termbank termtop insertions : 136073
% 0.42/0.85 % Search garbage collected termcells : 54631
% 0.42/0.85
% 0.42/0.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.85 % User time : 0.099 s
% 0.42/0.85 % System time : 0.046 s
% 0.42/0.85 % Total time : 0.144 s
% 0.42/0.85 % Maximum resident set size: 22368 pages
% 0.42/0.85
% 0.42/0.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.85 % User time : 0.347 s
% 0.42/0.85 % System time : 0.073 s
% 0.42/0.85 % Total time : 0.420 s
% 0.42/0.85 % Maximum resident set size: 15872 pages
% 0.42/0.85 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------