↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR092+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.74s 1.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   88 (  40   ~;  33   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2 sgn  19   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
    ? [X1223] :
      ( X1223 = s__Ancestor22_1
      & s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,X1223) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_93,axiom,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( s__instance(X15,s__Organism)
        & s__instance(X16,s__Organism) )
     => ( s__parent(X15,X16)
       => s__ancestor(X15,X16) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_93) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
          & s__subclass(X6,X7) )
       => s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
     => ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_226,axiom,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( s__instance(X15,s__Organism)
        & s__instance(X16,s__Organism) )
     => ( s__son(X15,X16)
       => s__parent(X15,X16) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_226) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__son(s__Man22_1,s__Ancestor22_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_15957,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__Organism),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_15957) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Human),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_18603,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Man,s__Organism),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_18603) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Man),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1223] :
        ( X1223 = s__Ancestor22_1
        & s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,X1223) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1224] :
      ( X1224 != s__Ancestor22_1
      | ~ s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,X1224) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != s__Ancestor22_1
    | ~ s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1225,X1226] :
      ( s__ancestor(X1225,X1226)
      | ~ s__parent(X1225,X1226)
      | ~ s__instance(X1225,s__Organism)
      | ~ s__instance(X1226,s__Organism) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_93])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1368,X1369,X1370] :
      ( s__instance(X1370,X1369)
      | ~ s__instance(X1370,X1368)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1368,X1369)
      | ~ s__instance(X1368,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1369,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1366,X1367] :
      ( ( ~ s__subclass(X1366,X1367)
        | s__instance(X1367,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( ~ s__subclass(X1366,X1367)
        | s__instance(X1366,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__ancestor(s__Man22_1,s__Ancestor22_1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ s__parent(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__Organism)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
    | s__ancestor(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X1248,X1249] :
      ( s__parent(X1248,X1249)
      | ~ s__son(X1248,X1249)
      | ~ s__instance(X1248,s__Organism)
      | ~ s__instance(X1249,s__Organism) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_226])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Organism)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Organism)
    | ~ s__parent(s__Man22_1,s__Ancestor22_1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ s__son(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__Organism)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Organism)
    | s__parent(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    s__son(s__Man22_1,s__Ancestor22_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__Organism),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_15957]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Organism)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Organism) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Organism) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    s__instance(s__Ancestor22_1,s__Human),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Man,s__Organism),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_18603]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Organism),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Man)
    | s__instance(X1,s__Organism) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    s__instance(s__Man22_1,s__Man),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR092+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:55:43 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/1.52  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.74/1.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.74/1.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2031289 completed with status 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1.74/1.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.74/1.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.74/1.52  % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 1.74/1.52  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.74/1.52  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.74/1.52  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2031297 completed with status 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Result found by U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.74/1.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.74/1.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.74/1.52  % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 1.74/1.52  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.74/1.52  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.74/1.52  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Starting U----_116Y_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.74/1.52  % Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 1.74/1.52  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.74/1.52  
% 1.74/1.52  % Proof found!
% 1.74/1.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.74/1.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.74/1.52  % Parsed axioms                        : 37985
% 1.74/1.52  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 37431
% 1.74/1.52  % Initial clauses                      : 615
% 1.74/1.52  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 1.74/1.52  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 611
% 1.74/1.52  % Processed clauses                    : 1963
% 1.74/1.52  % ...of these trivial                  : 335
% 1.74/1.52  % ...subsumed                          : 8
% 1.74/1.52  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1620
% 1.74/1.52  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 1.74/1.52  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 1.74/1.52  % Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 1.74/1.52  % Generated clauses                    : 2096
% 1.74/1.52  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1804
% 1.74/1.52  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 22
% 1.74/1.52  % Paramodulations                      : 2092
% 1.74/1.52  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 1.74/1.52  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Total rewrite steps                  : 670
% 1.74/1.52  % ...of those cached                   : 555
% 1.74/1.52  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.74/1.52  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.74/1.52  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.74/1.52  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.74/1.52  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.74/1.52  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.74/1.52  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.74/1.52  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.74/1.52  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.74/1.52  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.74/1.52  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.74/1.52  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.74/1.52  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1012
% 1.74/1.52  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 443
% 1.74/1.52  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.74/1.52  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 1.74/1.52  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 567
% 1.74/1.52  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1038
% 1.74/1.52  % ...number of literals in the above   : 5381
% 1.74/1.52  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Current number of archived clauses   : 604
% 1.74/1.52  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 36672
% 1.74/1.52  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14674
% 1.74/1.52  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 31
% 1.74/1.52  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3168
% 1.74/1.52  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 1.74/1.52  % BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 1.74/1.52  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.74/1.52  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 313942
% 1.74/1.52  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 128471
% 1.74/1.52  
% 1.74/1.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.74/1.52  % User time                : 0.174 s
% 1.74/1.52  % System time              : 0.074 s
% 1.74/1.52  % Total time               : 0.247 s
% 1.74/1.52  % Maximum resident set size: 52068 pages
% 1.74/1.52  
% 1.74/1.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.74/1.52  % User time                : 1.331 s
% 1.74/1.52  % System time              : 0.253 s
% 1.74/1.52  % Total time               : 1.583 s
% 1.74/1.52  % Maximum resident set size: 31488 pages
% 1.74/1.52  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------