%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR094+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.77s 2.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 40 ( 18 ~; 15 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
& s__instance(X8,X6) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMOcache_3900,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+3.ax',kb_SUMOcache_3900) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11] :
( ~ s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X9,X10)
| ~ s__instance(X11,X9)
| s__instance(X11,X10) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X8,X9] :
( ( s__instance(X8,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) )
& ( s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMOcache_3900]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__CorpuscularObject)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Canine) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR094+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 06:21:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.77/2.95 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 1.77/2.95 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 1.77/2.95 # Preprocessing time : 0.230 s
% 1.77/2.95
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof found!
% 1.77/2.95 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.77/2.95 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 1.77/2.95 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 1.77/2.95 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.77/2.95 # Parsed axioms : 14789
% 1.77/2.95 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14688
% 1.77/2.95 # Initial clauses : 104
% 1.77/2.95 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 1.77/2.95 # Initial clauses in saturation : 100
% 1.77/2.95 # Processed clauses : 103
% 1.77/2.95 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 1.77/2.95 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # ...remaining for further processing : 101
% 1.77/2.95 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Generated clauses : 438
% 1.77/2.95 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 423
% 1.77/2.95 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 1.77/2.95 # Paramodulations : 438
% 1.77/2.95 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Current number of processed clauses : 101
% 1.77/2.95 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 93
% 1.77/2.95 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.77/2.95 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 1.77/2.95 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 420
% 1.77/2.95 # ...number of literals in the above : 666
% 1.77/2.95 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18
% 1.77/2.95 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 1.77/2.95 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 1.77/2.95 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.77/2.95 # Termbank termtop insertions : 111998
% 1.77/2.95
% 1.77/2.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.77/2.95 # User time : 0.215 s
% 1.77/2.95 # System time : 0.018 s
% 1.77/2.95 # Total time : 0.233 s
% 1.77/2.95 # Maximum resident set size: 22460 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------