%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem : CSR094+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:07:21 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.81s 0.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 13 ~; 11 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [V__X,V__Y] :
( s__subclass(V__X,V__Y)
=> ( s__instance(V__Y,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(V__X,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [V__X,V__Y,V__Z] :
( ( s__instance(V__X,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(V__Y,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(V__Z,V__X)
& s__subclass(V__X,V__Y) )
=> s__instance(V__Z,V__Y) ) ),
file('theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
file('theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO_neg,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
cnf(c_34,plain,
( s__instance(A,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(A,B) ),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26]) ).
cnf(c_36,plain,
( s__instance(C,A)
| ~ s__instance(C,B)
| ~ s__subclass(B,A)
| ~ s__instance(B,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(A,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27]) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_723,axiom,
s__subclass(s__CorpuscularObject,s__SelfConnectedObject),
file('theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_723) ).
cnf(c_223,plain,
s__subclass(s__CorpuscularObject,s__SelfConnectedObject),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_723]) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_7256,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__Carnivore),
file('theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_7256) ).
cnf(c_229,plain,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__Carnivore),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7256]) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_17710,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
file('theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_17710) ).
cnf(c_273,plain,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_17710]) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
file('theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
cnf(c_285,plain,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_286,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO_neg]) ).
cnf(c_292,plain,
s__instance(s__CorpuscularObject,s__SetOrClass),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_223,c_34]) ).
cnf(c_307,plain,
( s__instance(s__Rover24_1,A)
| ~ s__subclass(s__Canine,A)
| ~ s__instance(s__Canine,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(A,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_36]) ).
cnf(c_667,plain,
s__instance(s__Canine,s__SetOrClass),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_229,c_34]) ).
cnf(c_668,plain,
( s__instance(s__Rover24_1,A)
| ~ s__subclass(s__Canine,A)
| ~ s__instance(A,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_667,c_307]) ).
cnf(c_1038,plain,
( s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject)
| ~ s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_668,c_292]) ).
cnf(c_1039,plain,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_273,c_1038]) ).
cnf(c_1037,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_286,c_1039]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR094+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 00:50:47 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.39 % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.12/0.39 % Process 3467223 was started by sandbox on n005,
% 0.12/0.39 % Sun Sep 27 00:50:47 2026
% 0.12/0.39 % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.81/0.97
% 0.81/0.97 % SInE (scan): 231 to sos (tol 1.5x), 14 to usable (tol 2.0x), 37737 zapped, of 37982 axioms (depth 3).
% 0.81/0.97
% 0.81/0.97 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.81/0.97
% 0.81/0.97 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.81/0.97
% 0.81/0.97 % Proof 1 at 0.15 (+ 0.08) seconds.
% 0.81/0.97 % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.81/0.97 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.81/0.97 % Maximum clause weight is 103.000.
% 0.81/0.97 % Given clauses 267.
% 0.81/0.97
% 0.81/0.97 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------