%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR094+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 10.09s 8.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 19 ~; 15 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
! [X1,X15,X13] :
( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X13,X1)
& s__subclass(X1,X15) )
=> s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_71535,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_71535) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2350,X2351,X2352] :
( s__instance(X2352,X2351)
| ~ s__instance(X2352,X2350)
| ~ s__subclass(X2350,X2351)
| ~ s__instance(X2350,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2351,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2348,X2349] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X2348,X2349)
| s__instance(X2349,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X2348,X2349)
| s__instance(X2348,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_71535]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Canine)
| s__instance(X1,s__CorpuscularObject) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR094+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.48 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.22/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:56:05 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.49 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.09/8.62 % Version: 3.5.1
% 10.09/8.62 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 10.09/8.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 293 seconds (2344 total)
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1465s (5) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 293s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 293s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting sh5l with 293s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % new_bool_1 with pid 3408936 completed with status 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 10.09/8.62 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 10.09/8.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 293 seconds (2344 total)
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1465s (5) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 293s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 293s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 10.09/8.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 10.09/8.62 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 10.09/8.62 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 10.09/8.62 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 293 seconds (293 total)
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3408996 completed with status 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 10.09/8.62 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 10.09/8.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 293 seconds (2344 total)
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1465s (5) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 293s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 293s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 10.09/8.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 10.09/8.62 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 10.09/8.62 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 10.09/8.62 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 293 seconds (293 total)
% 10.09/8.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 10.09/8.62 % Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 10.09/8.62
% 10.09/8.62 % Proof found!
% 10.09/8.62 % SZS status Theorem
% 10.09/8.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.09/8.62 % Parsed axioms : 145103
% 10.09/8.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 144876
% 10.09/8.62 % Initial clauses : 234
% 10.09/8.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 10.09/8.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 229
% 10.09/8.62 % Processed clauses : 807
% 10.09/8.62 % ...of these trivial : 258
% 10.09/8.62 % ...subsumed : 2
% 10.09/8.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 547
% 10.09/8.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 10.09/8.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 10.09/8.62 % Generated clauses : 1246
% 10.09/8.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 999
% 10.09/8.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 11
% 10.09/8.62 % Paramodulations : 1245
% 10.09/8.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % NegExts : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 10.09/8.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Total rewrite steps : 453
% 10.09/8.62 % ...of those cached : 413
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 10.09/8.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 10.09/8.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 10.09/8.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 10.09/8.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 10.09/8.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 544
% 10.09/8.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 274
% 10.09/8.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 10.09/8.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 269
% 10.09/8.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 419
% 10.09/8.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 858
% 10.09/8.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 10.09/8.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4595
% 10.09/8.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4437
% 10.09/8.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 10.09/8.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66
% 10.09/8.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 10.09/8.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 10.09/8.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 10.09/8.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1022630
% 10.09/8.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 459509
% 10.09/8.62
% 10.09/8.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 10.09/8.62 % User time : 0.485 s
% 10.09/8.62 % System time : 0.249 s
% 10.09/8.62 % Total time : 0.735 s
% 10.09/8.62 % Maximum resident set size: 177648 pages
% 10.09/8.62
% 10.09/8.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 10.09/8.62 % User time : 7.453 s
% 10.09/8.62 % System time : 0.487 s
% 10.09/8.62 % Total time : 7.940 s
% 10.09/8.62 % Maximum resident set size: 104448 pages
% 10.09/8.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------