%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR094+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 7.61s 6.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 19 ~; 15 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
! [X1,X15,X13] :
( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X13,X1)
& s__subclass(X1,X15) )
=> s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_71535,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+5.ax',kb_SUMO_71535) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2356,X2357,X2358] :
( s__instance(X2358,X2357)
| ~ s__instance(X2358,X2356)
| ~ s__subclass(X2356,X2357)
| ~ s__instance(X2356,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2357,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X2354,X2355] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X2354,X2355)
| s__instance(X2355,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X2354,X2355)
| s__instance(X2354,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__Canine),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Rover24_1,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(s__Canine,X1)
| s__instance(s__Rover24_1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__subclass(s__Canine,s__CorpuscularObject),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_71535]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR094+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.41 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:59:07 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.41 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.61/6.35 % Version: 3.5.1
% 7.61/6.35 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 7.61/6.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1475s (5) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 295s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting new_bool_1 with 295s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting sh5l with 295s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with pid 2552250 completed with status 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Result found by G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00
% 7.61/6.35 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 7.61/6.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1475s (5) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.61/6.35 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 7.61/6.35 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 7.61/6.35 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 7.61/6.35 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1475 seconds (1475 total)
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 133s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 148s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 363s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 133s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 133s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2552257 completed with status 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.61/6.35 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 7.61/6.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1475s (5) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.61/6.35 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 7.61/6.35 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 7.61/6.35 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 7.61/6.35 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1475 seconds (1475 total)
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 133s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 148s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 363s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 133s (1) cores
% 7.61/6.35 % Preprocessing time : 0.034 s
% 7.61/6.35
% 7.61/6.35 % Proof found!
% 7.61/6.35 % SZS status Theorem
% 7.61/6.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.61/6.35 % Parsed axioms : 145103
% 7.61/6.35 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 144847
% 7.61/6.35 % Initial clauses : 263
% 7.61/6.35 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 7.61/6.35 % Initial clauses in saturation : 255
% 7.61/6.35 % Processed clauses : 337
% 7.61/6.35 % ...of these trivial : 31
% 7.61/6.35 % ...subsumed : 4
% 7.61/6.35 % ...remaining for further processing : 302
% 7.61/6.35 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 7.61/6.35 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 7.61/6.35 % Generated clauses : 914
% 7.61/6.35 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 873
% 7.61/6.35 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 11
% 7.61/6.35 % Paramodulations : 913
% 7.61/6.35 % Factorizations : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % NegExts : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 7.61/6.35 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Total rewrite steps : 61
% 7.61/6.35 % ...of those cached : 32
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional check models : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 7.61/6.35 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 7.61/6.35 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 7.61/6.35 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 7.61/6.35 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 7.61/6.35 % Current number of processed clauses : 300
% 7.61/6.35 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 228
% 7.61/6.35 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 7.61/6.35 % Non-unit-clauses : 71
% 7.61/6.35 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 787
% 7.61/6.35 % ...number of literals in the above : 1209
% 7.61/6.35 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 7.61/6.35 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 452
% 7.61/6.35 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 175
% 7.61/6.35 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 7.61/6.35 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 552
% 7.61/6.35 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 7.61/6.35 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 7.61/6.35 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Condensation successes : 0
% 7.61/6.35 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1021400
% 7.61/6.35 % Search garbage collected termcells : 459753
% 7.61/6.35
% 7.61/6.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.61/6.35 % User time : 0.371 s
% 7.61/6.35 % System time : 0.159 s
% 7.61/6.35 % Total time : 0.530 s
% 7.61/6.35 % Maximum resident set size: 177904 pages
% 7.61/6.35
% 7.61/6.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.61/6.35 % User time : 5.725 s
% 7.61/6.35 % System time : 0.511 s
% 7.61/6.35 % Total time : 6.236 s
% 7.61/6.35 % Maximum resident set size: 104704 pages
% 7.61/6.35 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------