%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR097+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 3.72s 129.89s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 16
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 41 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 139 ( 30 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 159 ( 61 ~; 68 |; 22 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 98 ( 52 sgn 28 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_4682,axiom,
! [X171,X172,X173] :
( X172 = s__UnionFn(X173,X171)
<=> ! [X174,X175,X176] :
( ( s__instance(X173,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X172,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X171,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X174,X173)
& s__instance(X175,X171)
& s__instance(X176,X172) )
=> ( s__instance(X174,X172)
& s__instance(X175,X172)
& ( s__instance(X176,X173)
| s__instance(X176,X171) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_4682) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_10668,axiom,
~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__CommonEra,s__BeforeCommonEra),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_10668) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_1099,axiom,
! [X48] :
( s__instance(X48,s__TimeInterval)
=> s__overlapsTemporally(X48,X48) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_1099) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_4719,axiom,
! [X168] :
( s__instance(X168,s__SetOrClass)
=> ( s__instance(X168,s__NullSet)
=> ~ ? [X48] : s__instance(X48,X168) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_4719) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_10665,axiom,
s__instance(s__BeforeCommonEra,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_10665) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_374,axiom,
! [X9,X10] :
( s__disjoint(X9,X10)
<=> ! [X48] :
( ( s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ~ ( s__instance(X48,X9)
& s__instance(X48,X10) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_374) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_13786,axiom,
s__disjoint(s__OpeningEyes,s__ClosingEyes),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_13786) ).
fof(local_8,axiom,
s__instance(s__Object28_1,s__Planet28_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_8) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X177,X178,X179,X180,X181,X182,X177,X178,X179] :
( ( s__instance(X180,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X181,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X182,X179)
| s__instance(X182,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| ~ s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| ~ s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_4682])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__CommonEra,s__BeforeCommonEra),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_10668]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ s__overlapsTemporally(s__CommonEra,s__BeforeCommonEra),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X49] :
( ~ s__instance(X49,s__TimeInterval)
| s__overlapsTemporally(X49,X49) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1099])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X169,X170] :
( ~ s__instance(X169,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X169,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X170,X169) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_4719])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__overlapsTemporally(X2,s__BeforeCommonEra) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( s__overlapsTemporally(X1,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__instance(s__BeforeCommonEra,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_10665]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk189_3(X3,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,esk189_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk190_3(X3,X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( esk189_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4)
| X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4)
| X5 = s__UnionFn(X6,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| s__UnionFn(X3,X4) != X1 ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__UnionFn(X4,X5)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,s__NullSet),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X49,X50,X51,X49,X50] :
( ( ~ s__disjoint(X49,X50)
| ~ s__instance(X50,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X49,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X51,X49)
| ~ s__instance(X51,X50) )
& ( s__instance(X50,s__SetOrClass)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(X49,s__SetOrClass)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_2(X49,X50),X49)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_2(X49,X50),X50)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_374])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__UnionFn(X3,X4))
| X5 = s__UnionFn(X6,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__UnionFn(X3,X4)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ s__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_19]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__disjoint(s__OpeningEyes,s__ClosingEyes),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_13786]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
s__instance(s__Object28_1,s__Planet28_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__OpeningEyes)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__ClosingEyes) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
s__instance(s__Object28_1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_39])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : CSR097+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 07:56:33 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 3.12/26.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.12/26.17 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.12/26.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.12/27.07 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.25/49.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.25/49.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.25/49.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.25/50.09 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.39/72.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.39/72.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.40/72.90 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.40/73.10 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.52/95.24 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.53/95.77 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.53/96.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.53/96.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.67/118.27 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.67/119.07 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.67/119.70 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.67/119.83 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.72/129.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.72/129.89 # OLD status Res
% 3.72/129.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.872 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.72/129.89 # OLD status Res
% 3.72/129.89 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 3.72/129.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.354 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.72/129.89 # OLD status Res
% 3.72/129.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.848 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.72/129.89 # OLD status Res
% 3.72/129.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.999 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_750456fc664a9e0b97096ad0f5110b1ead7d782b for 23 seconds:
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.72/129.89 # OLD status Res
% 3.72/129.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.911 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a9abcacdf80c460fdc9fe242616d68da2308faf5 for 23 seconds:
% 3.72/129.89 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 3.72/129.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.251 s
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 3.72/129.89 # OLD status GaveUp
% 3.72/129.89 # Parsed axioms : 16758
% 3.72/129.89 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16747
% 3.72/129.89 # Initial clauses : 11
% 3.72/129.89 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 3.72/129.89 # Processed clauses : 19
% 3.72/129.89 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # ...subsumed : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 3.72/129.89 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Generated clauses : 8
% 3.72/129.89 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 3.72/129.89 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Paramodulations : 8
% 3.72/129.89 # Factorizations : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 3.72/129.89 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 3.72/129.89 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 3.72/129.89 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 3.72/129.89 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Termbank termtop insertions : 163671
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.72/129.89 # User time : 0.223 s
% 3.72/129.89 # System time : 0.029 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Total time : 0.252 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Maximum resident set size: 43632 pages
% 3.72/129.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e60008599937a0dc787316fd87bf9ff4d65ffb48 for 23 seconds:
% 3.72/129.89 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 3.72/129.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.252 s
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 3.72/129.89 # OLD status GaveUp
% 3.72/129.89 # Parsed axioms : 16758
% 3.72/129.89 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16721
% 3.72/129.89 # Initial clauses : 37
% 3.72/129.89 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Initial clauses in saturation : 37
% 3.72/129.89 # Processed clauses : 45
% 3.72/129.89 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # ...subsumed : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # ...remaining for further processing : 45
% 3.72/129.89 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 3.72/129.89 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Generated clauses : 16
% 3.72/129.89 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 3.72/129.89 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Paramodulations : 14
% 3.72/129.89 # Factorizations : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 3.72/129.89 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 3.72/129.89 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Non-unit-clauses : 31
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 3.72/129.89 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 80
% 3.72/129.89 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 3.72/129.89 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 3.72/129.89 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 3.72/129.89 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Termbank termtop insertions : 166733
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.72/129.89 # User time : 0.227 s
% 3.72/129.89 # System time : 0.026 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Total time : 0.253 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Maximum resident set size: 43416 pages
% 3.72/129.89 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_03d534503f753dd3be02bb3c547fa7a3e34e825e for 23 seconds:
% 3.72/129.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.906 s
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof found!
% 3.72/129.89 # SZS status Theorem
% 3.72/129.89 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object total steps : 41
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object clause steps : 28
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object generating inferences : 16
% 3.72/129.89 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 3.72/129.89 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 3.72/129.89 # Parsed axioms : 16758
% 3.72/129.89 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Initial clauses : 20280
% 3.72/129.89 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 3.72/129.89 # Initial clauses in saturation : 20217
% 3.72/129.89 # Processed clauses : 22937
% 3.72/129.89 # ...of these trivial : 74
% 3.72/129.89 # ...subsumed : 1723
% 3.72/129.89 # ...remaining for further processing : 21140
% 3.72/129.89 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1478
% 3.72/129.89 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 278353
% 3.72/129.89 # Backward-subsumed : 745
% 3.72/129.89 # Backward-rewritten : 4125
% 3.72/129.89 # Generated clauses : 568463
% 3.72/129.89 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 567258
% 3.72/129.89 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1730
% 3.72/129.89 # Paramodulations : 566580
% 3.72/129.89 # Factorizations : 19
% 3.72/129.89 # Equation resolutions : 1606
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of processed clauses : 16001
% 3.72/129.89 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9443
% 3.72/129.89 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 3.72/129.89 # Negative unit clauses : 38
% 3.72/129.89 # Non-unit-clauses : 6519
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 74624
% 3.72/129.89 # ...number of literals in the above : 141074
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Current number of archived clauses : 5128
% 3.72/129.89 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23238690
% 3.72/129.89 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4359286
% 3.72/129.89 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3317
% 3.72/129.89 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1124974
% 3.72/129.89 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 32067
% 3.72/129.89 # BW rewrite match attempts : 35183
% 3.72/129.89 # BW rewrite match successes : 32563
% 3.72/129.89 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.72/129.89 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6951080
% 3.72/129.89
% 3.72/129.89 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.72/129.89 # User time : 10.451 s
% 3.72/129.89 # System time : 0.244 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Total time : 10.695 s
% 3.72/129.89 # Maximum resident set size: 306548 pages
% 3.72/142.36 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.72/142.40 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.72/142.40 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.72/142.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.72/142.41 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------