%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR098+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.51s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR098+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.47 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.47 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:58:39 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/2.33 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.51/2.33 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/2.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % new_bool_1 with pid 1248194 completed with status 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 2.51/2.33 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/2.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.51/2.33 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.51/2.33 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.51/2.33 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.51/2.33 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1248196 completed with status 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 2.51/2.33 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/2.33 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1495s (5) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting new_bool_3 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.51/2.33 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.51/2.33 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.51/2.33 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 2.51/2.33 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 2.51/2.33 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 2.51/2.33 % Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 2.51/2.33
% 2.51/2.33 % Proof found!
% 2.51/2.33 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.51/2.33 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.51/2.33 % Parsed axioms : 37985
% 2.51/2.33 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37482
% 2.51/2.33 % Initial clauses : 525
% 2.51/2.33 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 2.51/2.33 % Initial clauses in saturation : 505
% 2.51/2.33 % Processed clauses : 435
% 2.51/2.33 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % ...subsumed : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % ...remaining for further processing : 434
% 2.51/2.33 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 2.51/2.33 % Generated clauses : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Paramodulations : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Factorizations : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % NegExts : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 2.51/2.33 % ...of those cached : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.51/2.33 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.51/2.33 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.51/2.33 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.51/2.33 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.51/2.33 % Current number of processed clauses : 432
% 2.51/2.33 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 432
% 2.51/2.33 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70
% 2.51/2.33 % ...number of literals in the above : 259
% 2.51/2.33 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 2.51/2.33 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 2.51/2.33 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 2.51/2.33 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.51/2.33 % Termbank termtop insertions : 263495
% 2.51/2.33 % Search garbage collected termcells : 126108
% 2.51/2.33
% 2.51/2.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.51/2.33 % User time : 0.144 s
% 2.51/2.33 % System time : 0.094 s
% 2.51/2.33 % Total time : 0.238 s
% 2.51/2.33 % Maximum resident set size: 52068 pages
% 2.51/2.33
% 2.51/2.33 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.51/2.33 % User time : 1.516 s
% 2.51/2.33 % System time : 0.167 s
% 2.51/2.33 % Total time : 1.683 s
% 2.51/2.33 % Maximum resident set size: 31488 pages
% 2.51/2.33 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------