%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR098+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 11.58s 10.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR098+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.45 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:57:48 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.58/10.14 % Version: 3.5.1
% 11.58/10.14 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.58/10.14 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 292 seconds (2336 total)
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1460s (5) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting new_bool_3 with 292s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting new_bool_1 with 292s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting sh5l with 292s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with pid 3765380 completed with status 0
% 11.58/10.14 % Result found by G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00
% 11.58/10.14 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.58/10.14 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 292 seconds (2336 total)
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1460s (5) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.58/10.14 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 11.58/10.14 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 11.58/10.14 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1460 seconds (1460 total)
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 132s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 147s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 132s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 132s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 132s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with pid 3765385 completed with status 0
% 11.58/10.14 % Result found by G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00
% 11.58/10.14 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 11.58/10.14 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 292 seconds (2336 total)
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1460s (5) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 11.58/10.14 % SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 11.58/10.14 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 11.58/10.14 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1460 seconds (1460 total)
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 132s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 147s (1) cores
% 11.58/10.14 % Preprocessing time : 0.035 s
% 11.58/10.14
% 11.58/10.14 % Proof found!
% 11.58/10.14 % SZS status Theorem
% 11.58/10.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.58/10.15 % Parsed axioms : 145105
% 11.58/10.15 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 144101
% 11.58/10.15 % Initial clauses : 1119
% 11.58/10.15 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 21
% 11.58/10.15 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1098
% 11.58/10.15 % Processed clauses : 14
% 11.58/10.15 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % ...subsumed : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 11.58/10.15 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Generated clauses : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Paramodulations : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Factorizations : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % NegExts : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 11.58/10.15 % ...of those cached : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional check models : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 11.58/10.15 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 11.58/10.15 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 11.58/10.15 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 11.58/10.15 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 11.58/10.15 % Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 11.58/10.15 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 11.58/10.15 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 11.58/10.15 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 11.58/10.15 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1084
% 11.58/10.15 % ...number of literals in the above : 2108
% 11.58/10.15 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 11.58/10.15 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 11.58/10.15 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Condensation successes : 0
% 11.58/10.15 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1046783
% 11.58/10.15 % Search garbage collected termcells : 462142
% 11.58/10.15
% 11.58/10.15 % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.58/10.15 % User time : 0.524 s
% 11.58/10.15 % System time : 0.214 s
% 11.58/10.15 % Total time : 0.738 s
% 11.58/10.15 % Maximum resident set size: 178108 pages
% 11.58/10.15
% 11.58/10.15 % -------------------------------------------------
% 11.58/10.15 % User time : 9.096 s
% 11.58/10.15 % System time : 0.592 s
% 11.58/10.15 % Total time : 9.688 s
% 11.58/10.15 % Maximum resident set size: 104448 pages
% 11.58/10.15 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------