%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR098+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.95s 1.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR098+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.43 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:00:51 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.39 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.95/1.39 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.95/1.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % new_bool_3 with pid 2554565 completed with status 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.95/1.39 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.95/1.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.95/1.39 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.95/1.39 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.95/1.39 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.95/1.39 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2554568 completed with status 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.95/1.39 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.95/1.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.95/1.39 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.95/1.39 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.95/1.39 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.95/1.39 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.95/1.39 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.39 % Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.95/1.39
% 0.95/1.39 % Proof found!
% 0.95/1.39 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.95/1.39 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.95/1.39 % Parsed axioms : 16752
% 0.95/1.39 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16673
% 0.95/1.39 % Initial clauses : 102
% 0.95/1.39 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 20
% 0.95/1.39 % Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 0.95/1.39 % Processed clauses : 24
% 0.95/1.39 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.95/1.39 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % NegExts : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.95/1.39 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.39 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.39 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.39 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.39 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.39 % Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.95/1.39 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.95/1.39 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 58
% 0.95/1.39 % ...number of literals in the above : 214
% 0.95/1.39 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.95/1.39 % Termbank termtop insertions : 171448
% 0.95/1.39 % Search garbage collected termcells : 88554
% 0.95/1.39
% 0.95/1.39 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/1.39 % User time : 0.108 s
% 0.95/1.39 % System time : 0.058 s
% 0.95/1.39 % Total time : 0.166 s
% 0.95/1.39 % Maximum resident set size: 42648 pages
% 0.95/1.39
% 0.95/1.39 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/1.39 % User time : 0.753 s
% 0.95/1.39 % System time : 0.110 s
% 0.95/1.39 % Total time : 0.864 s
% 0.95/1.39 % Maximum resident set size: 22016 pages
% 0.95/1.39 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------