%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR098+7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 25.53s 27.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 25.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 88 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 100 ( 34 ~; 44 |; 18 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 17 sgn 20 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1138,X136)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1139,X12) )
=> ( s__instance(X1138,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& ( s__instance(X1139,X136)
| s__instance(X1139,X137) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_50889,axiom,
s__subclass(s__Batrachotoxin,s__BodySubstance),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_50889) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Amphibian),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X2342] : ~ s__instance(X2342,s__Amphibian),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1140,X1141,X1142,X1143,X1144,X1145,X1140,X1141,X1142] :
( ( s__instance(X1143,X1141)
| ~ s__instance(X1143,X1142)
| ~ s__instance(X1144,X1140)
| ~ s__instance(X1145,X1141)
| ~ s__instance(X1142,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1141,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1140,s__SetOrClass)
| X1141 != s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( s__instance(X1144,X1141)
| ~ s__instance(X1143,X1142)
| ~ s__instance(X1144,X1140)
| ~ s__instance(X1145,X1141)
| ~ s__instance(X1142,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1141,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1140,s__SetOrClass)
| X1141 != s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( s__instance(X1145,X1142)
| s__instance(X1145,X1140)
| ~ s__instance(X1143,X1142)
| ~ s__instance(X1144,X1140)
| ~ s__instance(X1145,X1141)
| ~ s__instance(X1142,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1141,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1140,s__SetOrClass)
| X1141 != s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( s__instance(X1142,s__SetOrClass)
| X1141 = s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( s__instance(X1141,s__SetOrClass)
| X1141 = s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( s__instance(X1140,s__SetOrClass)
| X1141 = s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( s__instance(esk8_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1142)
| X1141 = s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( s__instance(esk9_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1140)
| X1141 = s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( s__instance(esk10_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1141)
| X1141 = s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk10_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1142)
| ~ s__instance(esk8_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1141)
| ~ s__instance(esk9_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1141)
| X1141 = s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk10_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1140)
| ~ s__instance(esk8_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1141)
| ~ s__instance(esk9_3(X1140,X1141,X1142),X1141)
| X1141 = s__UnionFn(X1142,X1140) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk10_3(X3,X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__Amphibian,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X16,X17] :
( ( s__instance(X16,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) )
& ( s__instance(X17,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = s__Amphibian
| s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__subclass(s__Batrachotoxin,s__BodySubstance),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_50889]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk9_3(X3,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__instance(s__Batrachotoxin,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( X1 = s__Amphibian
| s__instance(esk9_3(X2,X1,X3),X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
X1 = s__Amphibian,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR098+7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:37:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 25.53/27.72 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 25.53/27.72 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 25.53/27.72 # Preprocessing time : 1.022 s
% 25.53/27.72
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof found!
% 25.53/27.72 # SZS status Theorem
% 25.53/27.72 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object total steps : 22
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object clause steps : 14
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 25.53/27.72 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 25.53/27.72 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 25.53/27.72 # Parsed axioms : 55590
% 25.53/27.72 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55489
% 25.53/27.72 # Initial clauses : 158
% 25.53/27.72 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 25.53/27.72 # Initial clauses in saturation : 143
% 25.53/27.72 # Processed clauses : 407
% 25.53/27.72 # ...of these trivial : 19
% 25.53/27.72 # ...subsumed : 28
% 25.53/27.72 # ...remaining for further processing : 360
% 25.53/27.72 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 25.53/27.72 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 25.53/27.72 # Backward-subsumed : 12
% 25.53/27.72 # Backward-rewritten : 307
% 25.53/27.72 # Generated clauses : 1076
% 25.53/27.72 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1061
% 25.53/27.72 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 66
% 25.53/27.72 # Paramodulations : 1074
% 25.53/27.72 # Factorizations : 0
% 25.53/27.72 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 25.53/27.72 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 25.53/27.72 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 25.53/27.72 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 25.53/27.72 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 25.53/27.72 # Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 25.53/27.72 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 25.53/27.72 # ...number of literals in the above : 72
% 25.53/27.72 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 25.53/27.72 # Current number of archived clauses : 320
% 25.53/27.72 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8628
% 25.53/27.72 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3067
% 25.53/27.72 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 97
% 25.53/27.72 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 942
% 25.53/27.72 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 2
% 25.53/27.72 # BW rewrite match attempts : 220
% 25.53/27.72 # BW rewrite match successes : 170
% 25.53/27.72 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 25.53/27.72 # Condensation successes : 0
% 25.53/27.72 # Termbank termtop insertions : 673074
% 25.53/27.72
% 25.53/27.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 25.53/27.72 # User time : 0.990 s
% 25.53/27.72 # System time : 0.077 s
% 25.53/27.72 # Total time : 1.067 s
% 25.53/27.72 # Maximum resident set size: 156560 pages
% 25.53/28.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 25.53/28.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 25.53/28.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 25.53/28.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 25.53/28.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 25.53/28.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 25.53/28.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 25.53/28.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 25.53/28.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 25.53/28.62 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------