↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : CSR099+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 24 11:19:17 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 76.38s 10.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 76.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  14   ~;  11   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   1 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,plain,
    s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).

fof(prove_from_SUMO_negated,plain,
    s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).

cnf(15905,plain,
    s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_from_SUMO_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[15905]) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_1220,plain,
    ! [V__INST1,V__INST2] :
      ( ( s__instance(V__INST2,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(V__INST1,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(V__INST1,V__INST2)
          & s__subclass(V__INST2,V__INST1) )
       => V__INST1 = V__INST2 ) ),
    file('Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1220) ).

cnf(1412,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X0)
    | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[kb_SUMO_1220]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Class30_1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Reptile,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile)
    | ~ s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1)
    | s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1412]) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,plain,
    ! [V__X,V__Y] :
      ( s__subclass(V__X,V__Y)
     => ( s__instance(V__X,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(V__Y,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[kb_SUMO_26]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile)
    | s__instance(s__Reptile,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

fof(local_2,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

cnf(15903,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[local_2]) ).

cnf(l20,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[15903]) ).

cnf(l2,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1)
    | s__instance(s__Class30_1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

fof(local_3,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

cnf(15904,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(l19,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[15904]) ).

cnf(l4,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[15903]) ).

cnf(l7,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[15904]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l3,l20,l2,l19,l4,l7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : CSR099+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 20 07:53:49 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.57  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.20/0.57  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.20/0.57  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.20/0.57  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.20/0.57  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.20/0.57  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.20/0.57  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.20/0.57  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.20/0.58  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 3.03/0.92  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 76.38/10.13  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 76.38/10.13  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------