%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR099+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.77s 3.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 5 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_910,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ikqyeo8j/input.p',i_0_910) ).
cnf(i_0_1776,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ikqyeo8j/input.p',i_0_1776) ).
cnf(i_0_3002,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ikqyeo8j/input.p',i_0_3002) ).
cnf(i_0_3003,plain,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ikqyeo8j/input.p',i_0_3003) ).
cnf(i_0_3004,negated_conjecture,
s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ikqyeo8j/input.p',i_0_3004) ).
cnf(c_0_3010,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
i_0_910 ).
cnf(c_0_3011,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1776 ).
cnf(c_0_3012,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3010,c_0_3011]),c_0_3011]) ).
cnf(c_0_3013,plain,
s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
i_0_3002 ).
cnf(c_0_3014,plain,
s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
i_0_3003 ).
cnf(c_0_3015,negated_conjecture,
s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
i_0_3004 ).
cnf(c_0_3016,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3012,c_0_3013]),c_0_3014])]),c_0_3015]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR099+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 10:21:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.71/0.89 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.89 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.71/0.89 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.71/0.89 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.77/3.51 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 9.77/3.51 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.77/3.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.071 s
% 9.77/3.51
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof found!
% 9.77/3.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.77/3.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 9.77/3.51 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 9.77/3.51 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.77/3.51 # Parsed axioms : 2951
% 9.77/3.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Initial clauses : 2951
% 9.77/3.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2951
% 9.77/3.51 # Processed clauses : 405
% 9.77/3.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # ...subsumed : 2
% 9.77/3.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 403
% 9.77/3.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 9.77/3.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Generated clauses : 1565
% 9.77/3.51 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1291
% 9.77/3.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 9.77/3.51 # Paramodulations : 1563
% 9.77/3.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 9.77/3.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 403
% 9.77/3.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 308
% 9.77/3.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 9.77/3.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 94
% 9.77/3.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3832
% 9.77/3.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 7677
% 9.77/3.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2676
% 9.77/3.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 764
% 9.77/3.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 9.77/3.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 404
% 9.77/3.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 9.77/3.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 57921
% 9.77/3.51
% 9.77/3.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.77/3.51 # User time : 0.076 s
% 9.77/3.51 # System time : 0.011 s
% 9.77/3.51 # Total time : 0.087 s
% 9.77/3.51 # ...preprocessing : 0.071 s
% 9.77/3.51 # ...main loop : 0.016 s
% 9.77/3.51 # Maximum resident set size: 13148 pages
% 9.77/3.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------