↑ Up

leanCoP---2.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : leanCoP---2.2
% Problem  : CSR099+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leancop_casc.sh %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 21:15:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 92.48s 89.62s
% Output   : Proof 92.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : CSR099+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 10:32:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 92.48/89.62  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 92.48/89.62  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 92.48/89.63  
% 92.48/89.63  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 92.48/89.63  fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO, conjecture, s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_from_SUMO_MILO)).
% 92.48/89.63  fof(kb_SUMO_9334, axiom, s__subclass(s__Reptile, s__Physical), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax', kb_SUMO_9334)).
% 92.48/89.63  fof(local_2, axiom, s__subclass(s__Class30_1, s__Reptile), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', local_2)).
% 92.48/89.63  fof(local_3, axiom, s__subclass(s__Reptile, s__Class30_1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', local_3)).
% 92.48/89.63  fof(kb_SUMO_26, axiom, ! [_2818712, _2818715] : (s__subclass(_2818712, _2818715) => s__instance(_2818712, s__SetOrClass) & s__instance(_2818715, s__SetOrClass)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax', kb_SUMO_26)).
% 92.48/89.63  fof(kb_SUMO_1443, axiom, ! [_2820630, _2820633] : (s__instance(_2820633, s__SetOrClass) & s__instance(_2820630, s__SetOrClass) => s__subclass(_2820630, _2820633) & s__subclass(_2820633, _2820630) => _2820630 = _2820633), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax', kb_SUMO_1443)).
% 92.48/89.63  
% 92.48/89.63  cnf(1, plain, [s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile], clausify(prove_from_SUMO_MILO)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf(2, plain, [-(s__subclass(s__Reptile, s__Physical))], clausify(kb_SUMO_9334)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf(3, plain, [-(s__subclass(s__Class30_1, s__Reptile))], clausify(local_2)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf(4, plain, [-(s__subclass(s__Reptile, s__Class30_1))], clausify(local_3)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf(5, plain, [s__subclass(_748270, _748271), -(s__instance(_748270, s__SetOrClass))], clausify(kb_SUMO_26)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf(6, plain, [s__instance(_770132, s__SetOrClass), s__instance(_770133, s__SetOrClass), -(_770132 = _770133), s__subclass(_770132, _770133), s__subclass(_770133, _770132)], clausify(kb_SUMO_1443)).
% 92.48/89.63  
% 92.48/89.63  cnf('1',plain,[s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile],start(1)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf('1.1',plain,[-(s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile), s__instance(s__Class30_1, s__SetOrClass), s__instance(s__Reptile, s__SetOrClass), s__subclass(s__Class30_1, s__Reptile), s__subclass(s__Reptile, s__Class30_1)],extension(6,bind([[_770133, _770132], [s__Reptile, s__Class30_1]]))).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf('1.1.1',plain,[-(s__instance(s__Class30_1, s__SetOrClass)), s__subclass(s__Class30_1, s__Reptile)],extension(5,bind([[_748270, _748271], [s__Class30_1, s__Reptile]]))).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf('1.1.1.1',plain,[-(s__subclass(s__Class30_1, s__Reptile))],extension(3)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf('1.1.2',plain,[-(s__instance(s__Reptile, s__SetOrClass)), s__subclass(s__Reptile, s__Physical)],extension(5,bind([[_748270, _748271], [s__Reptile, s__Physical]]))).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf('1.1.2.1',plain,[-(s__subclass(s__Reptile, s__Physical))],extension(2)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf('1.1.3',plain,[-(s__subclass(s__Class30_1, s__Reptile))],extension(3)).
% 92.48/89.63  cnf('1.1.4',plain,[-(s__subclass(s__Reptile, s__Class30_1))],extension(4)).
% 92.48/89.63  %-----------------------------------------------------
% 92.48/89.64  
% 92.48/89.64  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------