↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR099+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 93.84s 99.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 93.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  16   ~;  13   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   1 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_28267,axiom,
    ! [X1034,X1035] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1035,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1034,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X1034,X1035)
          & s__subclass(X1035,X1034) )
       => X1034 = X1035 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_28267) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15] :
      ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
     => ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).

fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1036,X1037] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X1037,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1036,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1036,X1037)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1037,X1036)
      | X1036 = X1037 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_28267])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ( s__instance(X16,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) )
      & ( s__instance(X17,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X16,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    s__Class30_1 != s__Reptile,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : CSR099+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 17:50:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 93.84/99.02  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 93.84/99.02  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 93.84/99.02  # Preprocessing time       : 1.620 s
% 93.84/99.02  
% 93.84/99.02  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 93.84/99.02  # OLD status GaveUp
% 93.84/99.02  # Parsed axioms                        : 145105
% 93.84/99.02  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 145009
% 93.84/99.02  # Initial clauses                      : 97
% 93.84/99.02  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 97
% 93.84/99.02  # Processed clauses                    : 97
% 93.84/99.02  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # ...remaining for further processing  : 97
% 93.84/99.02  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 93.84/99.02  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Current number of processed clauses  : 95
% 93.84/99.02  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 92
% 93.84/99.02  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 93.84/99.02  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 93.84/99.02  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 93.84/99.02  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 93.84/99.02  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 93.84/99.02  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 93.84/99.02  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 93.84/99.02  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1007536
% 93.84/99.02  
% 93.84/99.02  # -------------------------------------------------
% 93.84/99.02  # User time                : 1.536 s
% 93.84/99.02  # System time              : 0.085 s
% 93.84/99.02  # Total time               : 1.621 s
% 93.84/99.02  # Maximum resident set size: 187788 pages
% 93.84/99.02  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 93.84/99.02  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 93.84/99.02  # Preprocessing time       : 1.519 s
% 93.84/99.02  
% 93.84/99.02  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 93.84/99.02  # OLD status GaveUp
% 93.84/99.02  # Parsed axioms                        : 145105
% 93.84/99.02  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 145089
% 93.84/99.02  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 93.84/99.02  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 93.84/99.02  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 93.84/99.02  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # ...remaining for further processing  : 16
% 93.84/99.02  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Current number of processed clauses  : 16
% 93.84/99.02  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
% 93.84/99.02  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 93.84/99.02  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 93.84/99.02  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 93.84/99.02  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 93.84/99.02  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1006356
% 93.84/99.02  
% 93.84/99.02  # -------------------------------------------------
% 93.84/99.02  # User time                : 1.422 s
% 93.84/99.02  # System time              : 0.098 s
% 93.84/99.02  # Total time               : 1.520 s
% 93.84/99.02  # Maximum resident set size: 189992 pages
% 93.84/99.02  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_48e494e00e0717ec2eabf59b73b2d711334607de for 23 seconds:
% 93.84/99.02  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,03,20000,1.0)
% 93.84/99.02  # Preprocessing time       : 1.500 s
% 93.84/99.02  
% 93.84/99.02  # Proof found!
% 93.84/99.02  # SZS status Theorem
% 93.84/99.02  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object total steps             : 16
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object clause steps            : 7
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 93.84/99.03  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 5
% 93.84/99.03  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 93.84/99.03  # Parsed axioms                        : 145105
% 93.84/99.03  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 144939
% 93.84/99.03  # Initial clauses                      : 174
% 93.84/99.03  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 93.84/99.03  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 170
% 93.84/99.03  # Processed clauses                    : 170
% 93.84/99.03  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 93.84/99.03  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # ...remaining for further processing  : 168
% 93.84/99.03  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Generated clauses                    : 730
% 93.84/99.03  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 565
% 93.84/99.03  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 10
% 93.84/99.03  # Paramodulations                      : 730
% 93.84/99.03  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Current number of processed clauses  : 168
% 93.84/99.03  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 150
% 93.84/99.03  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 93.84/99.03  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 93.84/99.03  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 93.84/99.03  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 565
% 93.84/99.03  # ...number of literals in the above   : 853
% 93.84/99.03  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 43
% 93.84/99.03  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 93.84/99.03  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
% 93.84/99.03  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 93.84/99.03  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 93.84/99.03  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1011487
% 93.84/99.03  
% 93.84/99.03  # -------------------------------------------------
% 93.84/99.03  # User time                : 1.411 s
% 93.84/99.03  # System time              : 0.093 s
% 93.84/99.03  # Total time               : 1.504 s
% 93.84/99.03  # Maximum resident set size: 188812 pages
% 93.84/102.81  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.81  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.81  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.81  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.82  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.82  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.83  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.83  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.83  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.83  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.84  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.84  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.85  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.85  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.85  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.85  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.86  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.86  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.87  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.87  eprover: No such file or directory
% 93.84/102.87  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 93.84/102.87  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------