↑ Up

Drodi-SAT---4.1.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi-SAT---4.1.1
% Problem  : CSR099+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.58s 1.40s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR099+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:59:09 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.64/0.94  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 2.58/1.40  % Refutation found
% 2.58/1.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 2.58/1.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f26,axiom,(
% 2.58/1.40    (! [V__X,V__Y] :( s__subclass(V__X,V__Y)=> ( s__instance(V__X,s__SetOrClass)& s__instance(V__Y,s__SetOrClass) ) ) )),
% 2.58/1.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f1440,axiom,(
% 2.58/1.40    (! [V__INST1,V__INST2] :( ( s__instance(V__INST2,s__SetOrClass)& s__instance(V__INST1,s__SetOrClass) )=> ( ( s__subclass(V__INST1,V__INST2)& s__subclass(V__INST2,V__INST1) )=> V__INST1 = V__INST2 ) ) )),
% 2.58/1.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f16750,axiom,(
% 2.58/1.40    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile) ),
% 2.58/1.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f16751,axiom,(
% 2.58/1.40    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1) ),
% 2.58/1.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f16752,conjecture,(
% 2.58/1.40    s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile ),
% 2.58/1.40    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f16753,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.58/1.40    ~(s__Class30_1 = s__Reptile )),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f16752])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f16793,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ![V__X,V__Y]: (~s__subclass(V__X,V__Y)|(s__instance(V__X,s__SetOrClass)&s__instance(V__Y,s__SetOrClass)))),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f26])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f16794,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ![X0,X1]: (~s__subclass(X0,X1)|s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass))),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16793])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f16795,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ![X0,X1]: (~s__subclass(X0,X1)|s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass))),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16793])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f19531,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ![V__INST1,V__INST2]: ((~s__instance(V__INST2,s__SetOrClass)|~s__instance(V__INST1,s__SetOrClass))|((~s__subclass(V__INST1,V__INST2)|~s__subclass(V__INST2,V__INST1))|V__INST1=V__INST2))),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f1440])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f19532,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ![X0,X1]: (~s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)|~s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)|~s__subclass(X1,X0)|~s__subclass(X0,X1)|X1=X0)),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19531])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f44207,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile)),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16750])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f44208,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1)),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16751])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f44209,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ~s__Class30_1=s__Reptile),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16753])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f44750,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    s__instance(s__Reptile,s__SetOrClass)),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f16794,f44208])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f46246,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ![X0,X1]: (~s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)|~s__subclass(X0,X1)|~s__subclass(X1,X0)|X0=X1)),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f19532,f16795])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f46348,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ![X0]: (~s__subclass(s__Reptile,X0)|~s__subclass(X0,s__Reptile)|s__Reptile=X0)),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f46246,f44750])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f46351,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    ~s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1)|s__Reptile=s__Class30_1),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f46348,f44207])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f46353,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    s__Reptile=s__Class30_1),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f46351,f44208])).
% 2.58/1.40  fof(f46357,plain,(
% 2.58/1.40    $false),
% 2.58/1.40    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f46353,f44209])).
% 2.58/1.40  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/1.46  % Elapsed time: 1.075261 seconds
% 2.25/1.46  % CPU time: 3.430144 seconds
% 2.25/1.46  % Total memory used: 1.041 GB
% 2.25/1.46  % Net memory used: 1.034 GB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------