↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR100+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 12.19s 7.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  104 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   45 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  122 (  45   ~;  51   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   24 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (  12 sgn  26   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15] :
      ( s__subclass(X1,X15)
     => ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
    ! [X137,X12,X136] :
      ( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
    <=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
          ( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
            & s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
            & s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
         => ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
              & s__instance(X34,X137)
              & s__instance(X1138,X136) )
           => ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
                | s__instance(X1139,X136) )
              & s__instance(X34,X12)
              & s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).

fof(local_8,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_2,s__Class31_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_8) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26636,axiom,
    ! [X1,X15,X13] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X13,X1)
          & s__subclass(X1,X15) )
       => s__instance(X13,X15) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26636) ).

fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ? [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Class31_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(local_9,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_9) ).

fof(local_10,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_10) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2343,X2344] :
      ( ( ~ s__subclass(X2343,X2344)
        | s__instance(X2344,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( ~ s__subclass(X2343,X2344)
        | s__instance(X2343,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X2367,X2368,X2369,X2370,X2371,X2372,X2373,X2374,X2375] :
      ( ( X2374 = s__UnionFn(X2375,X2373)
        | ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2374)
        | ~ s__instance(esk1_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2374)
        | ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2373) )
      & ( X2374 = s__UnionFn(X2375,X2373)
        | ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2374)
        | ~ s__instance(esk1_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2374)
        | ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2375) )
      & ( X2374 = s__UnionFn(X2375,X2373)
        | s__instance(esk3_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2374) )
      & ( X2374 = s__UnionFn(X2375,X2373)
        | s__instance(esk2_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2373) )
      & ( X2374 = s__UnionFn(X2375,X2373)
        | s__instance(esk1_3(X2373,X2374,X2375),X2375) )
      & ( X2374 = s__UnionFn(X2375,X2373)
        | s__instance(X2373,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( X2374 = s__UnionFn(X2375,X2373)
        | s__instance(X2374,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( X2374 = s__UnionFn(X2375,X2373)
        | s__instance(X2375,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( X2368 != s__UnionFn(X2369,X2367)
        | ~ s__instance(X2367,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
        | ~ s__instance(X2371,X2367)
        | ~ s__instance(X2370,X2369)
        | s__instance(X2372,X2367)
        | s__instance(X2372,X2369) )
      & ( X2368 != s__UnionFn(X2369,X2367)
        | ~ s__instance(X2367,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
        | ~ s__instance(X2371,X2367)
        | ~ s__instance(X2370,X2369)
        | s__instance(X2371,X2368) )
      & ( X2368 != s__UnionFn(X2369,X2367)
        | ~ s__instance(X2367,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2368,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__instance(X2372,X2368)
        | ~ s__instance(X2371,X2367)
        | ~ s__instance(X2370,X2369)
        | s__instance(X2370,X2368) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_2,s__Class31_3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    s__instance(s__Class31_3,s__SetOrClass),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X2345,X2346,X2347] :
      ( s__instance(X2347,X2346)
      | ~ s__instance(X2347,X2345)
      | ~ s__subclass(X2345,X2346)
      | ~ s__instance(X2345,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X2346,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26636])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Class31_1),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2342] : ~ s__instance(X2342,s__Class31_1),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | s__instance(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class31_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class31_3),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class31_2),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_10]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR100+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:58:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.19/7.29  % Version: 3.5.1
% 12.19/7.29  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 12.19/7.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % sh5l with pid 1029404 completed with status 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Result found by sh5l
% 12.19/7.29  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 12.19/7.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 12.19/7.29  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 12.19/7.29  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 12.19/7.29  % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 12.19/7.29  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1029415 completed with status 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 12.19/7.29  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 12.19/7.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 12.19/7.29  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 12.19/7.29  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 12.19/7.29  % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 12.19/7.29  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 12.19/7.29  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 12.19/7.29  % Preprocessing time       : 0.131 s
% 12.19/7.29  
% 12.19/7.29  % Proof found!
% 12.19/7.29  % SZS status Theorem
% 12.19/7.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.19/7.29  % Parsed axioms                        : 55597
% 12.19/7.29  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 54398
% 12.19/7.29  % Initial clauses                      : 1856
% 12.19/7.29  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 143
% 12.19/7.29  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1713
% 12.19/7.29  % Processed clauses                    : 4628
% 12.19/7.29  % ...of these trivial                  : 412
% 12.19/7.29  % ...subsumed                          : 1449
% 12.19/7.29  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2767
% 12.19/7.29  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 34
% 12.19/7.29  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Backward-subsumed                    : 203
% 12.19/7.29  % Backward-rewritten                   : 243
% 12.19/7.29  % Generated clauses                    : 17946
% 12.19/7.29  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16036
% 12.19/7.29  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 9
% 12.19/7.29  % Paramodulations                      : 17904
% 12.19/7.29  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 12.19/7.29  % NegExts                              : 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Equation resolutions                 : 34
% 12.19/7.29  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2564
% 12.19/7.29  % ...of those cached                   : 2141
% 12.19/7.29  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 12.19/7.29  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 12.19/7.29  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 12.19/7.29  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 12.19/7.29  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 12.19/7.29  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 12.19/7.29  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 12.19/7.29  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 12.19/7.29  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 12.19/7.29  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 12.19/7.29  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 12.19/7.29  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 12.19/7.29  % Current number of processed clauses  : 2313
% 12.19/7.29  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 549
% 12.19/7.29  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.19/7.29  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 12.19/7.29  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1761
% 12.19/7.29  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10575
% 12.19/7.29  % ...number of literals in the above   : 34497
% 12.19/7.29  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Current number of archived clauses   : 448
% 12.19/7.29  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2012666
% 12.19/7.29  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1817306
% 12.19/7.29  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1497
% 12.19/7.29  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34547
% 12.19/7.29  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 12.19/7.29  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 558
% 12.19/7.29  % BW rewrite match successes           : 188
% 12.19/7.29  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 12.19/7.29  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 948235
% 12.19/7.29  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 317708
% 12.19/7.29  
% 12.19/7.29  % -------------------------------------------------
% 12.19/7.29  % User time                : 2.225 s
% 12.19/7.29  % System time              : 0.617 s
% 12.19/7.29  % Total time               : 2.842 s
% 12.19/7.29  % Maximum resident set size: 138072 pages
% 12.19/7.29  
% 12.19/7.29  % -------------------------------------------------
% 12.19/7.29  % User time                : 5.744 s
% 12.19/7.29  % System time              : 0.809 s
% 12.19/7.29  % Total time               : 6.553 s
% 12.19/7.29  % Maximum resident set size: 63744 pages
% 12.19/7.29  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------