%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR103+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:53 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.52s 0.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 1 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
! [X1223] : s__instance(X1223,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_606,axiom,
! [X26] : s__instance(X26,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_606) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1223] : s__instance(X1223,s__Entity),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1225] : s__instance(X1225,s__Entity),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_606]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR103+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:02:02 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/0.97 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.52/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.52/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % new_bool_1 with pid 3554387 completed with status 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.52/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.52/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.52/0.97 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.52/0.97 % Search class: FHUSF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.52/0.97 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.52/0.97 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3554390 completed with status 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.52/0.97 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.52/0.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.52/0.97 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.52/0.97 % Search class: FHUSF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.52/0.97 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.52/0.97 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.52/0.97 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.97 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.52/0.97
% 0.52/0.97 % Proof found!
% 0.52/0.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.52/0.97 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.52/0.97 % Parsed axioms : 37982
% 0.52/0.97 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37965
% 0.52/0.97 % Initial clauses : 20
% 0.52/0.97 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.52/0.97 % Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.52/0.97 % Processed clauses : 10
% 0.52/0.97 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.52/0.97 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.52/0.97 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % NegExts : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.52/0.97 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.97 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.97 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.97 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.97 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.97 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.52/0.97 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.52/0.97 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.52/0.97 % ...number of literals in the above : 22
% 0.52/0.97 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.52/0.97 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.52/0.97 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.52/0.97 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.52/0.97 % Termbank termtop insertions : 248888
% 0.52/0.97 % Search garbage collected termcells : 125622
% 0.52/0.97
% 0.52/0.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.97 % User time : 0.114 s
% 0.52/0.97 % System time : 0.054 s
% 0.52/0.97 % Total time : 0.168 s
% 0.52/0.97 % Maximum resident set size: 52068 pages
% 0.52/0.97
% 0.52/0.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.97 % User time : 0.434 s
% 0.52/0.97 % System time : 0.089 s
% 0.52/0.97 % Total time : 0.523 s
% 0.52/0.97 % Maximum resident set size: 31488 pages
% 0.52/0.97 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------