%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR103+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:53 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.56s 0.89s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 1 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
! [X591] : s__instance(X591,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_502,axiom,
! [X26] : s__instance(X26,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_502) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X591] : s__instance(X591,s__Entity),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X593] : s__instance(X593,s__Entity),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_502]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR103+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:59:25 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.89 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.56/0.89 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.89 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % new_bool_1 with pid 2188485 completed with status 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.56/0.89 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.89 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.56/0.89 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/0.89 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.89 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.89 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2188487 completed with status 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.56/0.89 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.89 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.56/0.89 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/0.89 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.89 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.89 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.56/0.89 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.89 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.56/0.89
% 0.56/0.89 % Proof found!
% 0.56/0.89 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.56/0.89 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.89 % Parsed axioms : 7218
% 0.56/0.89 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7151
% 0.56/0.89 % Initial clauses : 72
% 0.56/0.89 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.56/0.89 % Initial clauses in saturation : 64
% 0.56/0.89 % Processed clauses : 11
% 0.56/0.89 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.56/0.89 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.56/0.89 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % NegExts : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.56/0.89 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.89 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.89 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.89 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.89 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.89 % Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.56/0.89 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.56/0.89 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 53
% 0.56/0.89 % ...number of literals in the above : 189
% 0.56/0.89 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.56/0.89 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.56/0.89 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.56/0.89 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/0.89 % Termbank termtop insertions : 82915
% 0.56/0.89 % Search garbage collected termcells : 39852
% 0.56/0.89
% 0.56/0.89 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.89 % User time : 0.033 s
% 0.56/0.89 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.56/0.89 % Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.56/0.89 % Maximum resident set size: 18736 pages
% 0.56/0.89
% 0.56/0.89 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.89 % User time : 0.316 s
% 0.56/0.89 % System time : 0.038 s
% 0.56/0.89 % Total time : 0.355 s
% 0.56/0.89 % Maximum resident set size: 12544 pages
% 0.56/0.89 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------