%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR103+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.92s 2.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 1 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
! [X591] : s__instance(X591,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_502,axiom,
! [X26] : s__instance(X26,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_502) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X591] : s__instance(X591,s__Entity),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X27] : s__instance(X27,s__Entity),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_502]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : CSR103+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:54:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.92/2.10 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.92/2.10 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.92/2.10 # Preprocessing time : 0.200 s
% 0.92/2.10
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof found!
% 0.92/2.10 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/2.10 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object total steps : 8
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.92/2.10 # Parsed axioms : 7218
% 0.92/2.10 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7138
% 0.92/2.10 # Initial clauses : 85
% 0.92/2.10 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.92/2.10 # Initial clauses in saturation : 77
% 0.92/2.10 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.92/2.10 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.92/2.10 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73
% 0.92/2.10 # ...number of literals in the above : 243
% 0.92/2.10 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.92/2.10 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.92/2.10 # Termbank termtop insertions : 82654
% 0.92/2.10
% 0.92/2.10 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.92/2.10 # User time : 0.185 s
% 0.92/2.10 # System time : 0.015 s
% 0.92/2.10 # Total time : 0.200 s
% 0.92/2.10 # Maximum resident set size: 18376 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------