%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR103+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:53 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 6.16s 4.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 79 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 96 ( 34 ~; 40 |; 18 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 10 sgn 22 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
? [X2341] :
! [X2342] : s__instance(X2342,X2341),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_32603,axiom,
! [X137,X12,X136] :
( X12 = s__UnionFn(X136,X137)
<=> ! [X1138,X34,X1139] :
( ( s__instance(X137,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X12,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X136,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X12)
& s__instance(X34,X137)
& s__instance(X1138,X136) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X1139,X137)
| s__instance(X1139,X136) )
& s__instance(X34,X12)
& s__instance(X1138,X12) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_32603) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26635,axiom,
! [X1,X15] :
( s__subclass(X1,X15)
=> ( s__instance(X15,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_26635) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_27515,axiom,
s__subclass(s__ContentBearingPhysical,s__Physical),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27515) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2341] :
! [X2342] : s__instance(X2342,X2341),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2369,X2370,X2371,X2372,X2373,X2374,X2375,X2376,X2377] :
( ( X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk4_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2375) )
& ( X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375)
| ~ s__instance(esk3_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk2_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376)
| ~ s__instance(esk4_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2377) )
& ( X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375)
| s__instance(esk4_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2376) )
& ( X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375)
| s__instance(esk3_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2375) )
& ( X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375)
| s__instance(esk2_3(X2375,X2376,X2377),X2377) )
& ( X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375)
| s__instance(X2375,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375)
| s__instance(X2376,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2376 = s__UnionFn(X2377,X2375)
| s__instance(X2377,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( X2370 != s__UnionFn(X2371,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2371)
| s__instance(X2374,X2369)
| s__instance(X2374,X2371) )
& ( X2370 != s__UnionFn(X2371,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2371)
| s__instance(X2373,X2370) )
& ( X2370 != s__UnionFn(X2371,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2369,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2370,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2371,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2374,X2370)
| ~ s__instance(X2373,X2369)
| ~ s__instance(X2372,X2371)
| s__instance(X2372,X2370) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_32603])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X2343] : ~ s__instance(esk1_1(X2343),X2343),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X2 = s__UnionFn(X3,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2345,X2346] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X2345,X2346)
| s__instance(X2346,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X2345,X2346)
| s__instance(X2345,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26635])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(esk1_1(X1),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
s__subclass(s__ContentBearingPhysical,s__Physical),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27515]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__instance(s__Physical,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR103+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.44 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:58:50 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.16/4.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 6.16/4.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.16/4.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % sh5l with pid 1030260 completed with status 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Result found by sh5l
% 6.16/4.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.16/4.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 6.16/4.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 6.16/4.48 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.16/4.48 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.16/4.48 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1030263 completed with status 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 6.16/4.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 6.16/4.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1485s (5) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 6.16/4.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 6.16/4.48 % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.16/4.48 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 6.16/4.48 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 6.16/4.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 6.16/4.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.038 s
% 6.16/4.48
% 6.16/4.48 % Proof found!
% 6.16/4.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 6.16/4.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.16/4.48 % Parsed axioms : 55587
% 6.16/4.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55427
% 6.16/4.48 % Initial clauses : 196
% 6.16/4.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 25
% 6.16/4.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 171
% 6.16/4.48 % Processed clauses : 74
% 6.16/4.48 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 6.16/4.48 % ...subsumed : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 66
% 6.16/4.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 6.16/4.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Backward-subsumed : 16
% 6.16/4.48 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Generated clauses : 446
% 6.16/4.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 414
% 6.16/4.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Paramodulations : 423
% 6.16/4.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % NegExts : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 6.16/4.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Total rewrite steps : 16
% 6.16/4.48 % ...of those cached : 8
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 6.16/4.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 6.16/4.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 6.16/4.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 6.16/4.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 6.16/4.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 27
% 6.16/4.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 6.16/4.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 6.16/4.48 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 6.16/4.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 6.16/4.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 511
% 6.16/4.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 1169
% 6.16/4.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 38
% 6.16/4.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
% 6.16/4.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 6.16/4.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 6.16/4.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 134
% 6.16/4.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 66
% 6.16/4.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 196
% 6.16/4.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 58
% 6.16/4.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 6.16/4.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 668565
% 6.16/4.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 293736
% 6.16/4.48
% 6.16/4.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.16/4.48 % User time : 0.377 s
% 6.16/4.48 % System time : 0.218 s
% 6.16/4.48 % Total time : 0.595 s
% 6.16/4.48 % Maximum resident set size: 137016 pages
% 6.16/4.48
% 6.16/4.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.16/4.48 % User time : 3.393 s
% 6.16/4.48 % System time : 0.389 s
% 6.16/4.48 % Total time : 3.782 s
% 6.16/4.48 % Maximum resident set size: 63744 pages
% 6.16/4.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------