↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR104+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.64s 0.92s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  42   ~;  36   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
          & s__subclass(X6,X7) )
       => s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
     => ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_912,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_912) ).

fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_1262,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X105] :
      ( ( s__instance(X4,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X5,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X105,s__TimePosition) )
     => ( ( s__temporalPart(X5,X105)
          & s__temporalPart(X4,X5) )
       => s__temporalPart(X4,X105) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1262) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_74,axiom,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( s__instance(X15,s__TimeInterval)
        & s__instance(X16,s__TimeInterval) )
     => ( s__during(X15,X16)
       => s__temporalPart(X15,X16) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_74) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).

fof(local_5,axiom,
    s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_908,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_908) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X687,X688,X689] :
      ( s__instance(X689,X688)
      | ~ s__instance(X689,X687)
      | ~ s__subclass(X687,X688)
      | ~ s__instance(X687,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X688,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X685,X686] :
      ( ( ~ s__subclass(X685,X686)
        | s__instance(X686,s__SetOrClass) )
      & ( ~ s__subclass(X685,X686)
        | s__instance(X685,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | s__instance(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | s__instance(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_912]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X594,X595,X596] :
      ( s__temporalPart(X594,X596)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X595,X596)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X594,X595)
      | ~ s__instance(X594,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X595,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X596,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1262])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePoint)
    | s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X663,X664] :
      ( s__temporalPart(X663,X664)
      | ~ s__during(X663,X664)
      | ~ s__instance(X663,s__TimeInterval)
      | ~ s__instance(X664,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_74])])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ s__temporalPart(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | s__temporalPart(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ s__during(X2,X1)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
    | s__temporalPart(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,X1)
    | s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_908]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
    | s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_38]),c_0_30])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR104+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:02:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/0.92  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.64/0.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % new_bool_3 with pid 2557026 completed with status 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.64/0.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.64/0.92  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.64/0.92  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.64/0.92  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.64/0.92  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2557029 completed with status 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.64/0.92  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.92  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.64/0.92  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.64/0.92  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.64/0.92  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.64/0.92  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.64/0.92  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.92  % Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.64/0.92  
% 0.64/0.92  % Proof found!
% 0.64/0.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.64/0.92  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.64/0.92  % Parsed axioms                        : 14793
% 0.64/0.92  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 14609
% 0.64/0.92  % Initial clauses                      : 209
% 0.64/0.92  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.64/0.92  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 205
% 0.64/0.92  % Processed clauses                    : 971
% 0.64/0.92  % ...of these trivial                  : 66
% 0.64/0.92  % ...subsumed                          : 300
% 0.64/0.92  % ...remaining for further processing  : 605
% 0.64/0.92  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.64/0.92  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.64/0.92  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.64/0.92  % Generated clauses                    : 1985
% 0.64/0.92  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1730
% 0.64/0.92  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 29
% 0.64/0.92  % Paramodulations                      : 1981
% 0.64/0.92  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.64/0.92  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Total rewrite steps                  : 453
% 0.64/0.92  % ...of those cached                   : 374
% 0.64/0.92  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.64/0.92  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.64/0.92  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.64/0.92  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.64/0.92  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.64/0.92  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.64/0.92  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.64/0.92  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.64/0.92  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.64/0.92  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.64/0.92  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.64/0.92  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.64/0.92  % Current number of processed clauses  : 592
% 0.64/0.92  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 109
% 0.64/0.92  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.64/0.92  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.64/0.92  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 481
% 0.64/0.92  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 964
% 0.64/0.92  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3367
% 0.64/0.92  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.64/0.92  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46780
% 0.64/0.92  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37978
% 0.64/0.92  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 331
% 0.64/0.92  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 195
% 0.64/0.92  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.64/0.92  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.64/0.92  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.64/0.92  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 145566
% 0.64/0.92  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 54436
% 0.64/0.92  
% 0.64/0.92  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.92  % User time                : 0.148 s
% 0.64/0.92  % System time              : 0.057 s
% 0.64/0.92  % Total time               : 0.204 s
% 0.64/0.92  % Maximum resident set size: 22112 pages
% 0.64/0.92  
% 0.64/0.92  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.92  % User time                : 0.400 s
% 0.64/0.92  % System time              : 0.079 s
% 0.64/0.92  % Total time               : 0.479 s
% 0.64/0.92  % Maximum resident set size: 15616 pages
% 0.64/0.92  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------