↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR104+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.61s 30.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   99 (  45   ~;  39   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_68,axiom,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( s__instance(X16,s__TimeInterval)
        & s__instance(X15,s__TimeInterval) )
     => ( s__during(X15,X16)
       => s__temporalPart(X15,X16) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_68) ).

fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_1502,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X105] :
      ( ( s__instance(X105,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X5,s__TimePosition)
        & s__instance(X4,s__TimePosition) )
     => ( ( s__temporalPart(X4,X5)
          & s__temporalPart(X5,X105) )
       => s__temporalPart(X4,X105) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_1502) ).

fof(local_5,axiom,
    s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(local_2,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
          & s__instance(X8,X6) )
       => s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( s__subclass(X6,X7)
     => ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_1012,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_1012) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_1016,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_1016) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X17,X18] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X18,s__TimeInterval)
      | ~ s__instance(X17,s__TimeInterval)
      | ~ s__during(X17,X18)
      | s__temporalPart(X17,X18) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_68])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X106,X107,X108] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X108,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X107,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__instance(X106,s__TimePosition)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X106,X107)
      | ~ s__temporalPart(X107,X108)
      | s__temporalPart(X106,X108) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1502])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__during(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ~ s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__subclass(X9,X10)
      | ~ s__instance(X11,X9)
      | s__instance(X11,X10) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] :
      ( ( s__instance(X8,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) )
      & ( s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass)
        | ~ s__subclass(X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,s__TimeInterval35_2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__TimeInterval35_1)
    | ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1012]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1016]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePoint) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_33]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : CSR104+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:39:32 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.60/29.65  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.60/29.65  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.60/29.68  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.61/30.01  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.61/30.77  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 6.61/30.77  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 6.61/30.77  # Preprocessing time       : 0.343 s
% 6.61/30.77  
% 6.61/30.77  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 6.61/30.77  # OLD status GaveUp
% 6.61/30.77  # Parsed axioms                        : 37987
% 6.61/30.77  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 37921
% 6.61/30.77  # Initial clauses                      : 81
% 6.61/30.77  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 81
% 6.61/30.77  # Processed clauses                    : 132
% 6.61/30.77  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 6.61/30.77  # ...remaining for further processing  : 131
% 6.61/30.77  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 6.61/30.77  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 6.61/30.77  # Generated clauses                    : 52
% 6.61/30.77  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 51
% 6.61/30.77  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 6.61/30.77  # Paramodulations                      : 49
% 6.61/30.77  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 6.61/30.77  # Current number of processed clauses  : 126
% 6.61/30.77  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 34
% 6.61/30.77  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.61/30.77  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 6.61/30.77  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 88
% 6.61/30.77  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 6.61/30.77  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 6.61/30.77  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 832
% 6.61/30.77  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 309
% 6.61/30.77  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 6.61/30.77  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 134
% 6.61/30.77  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 6.61/30.77  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 6.61/30.77  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 254924
% 6.61/30.77  
% 6.61/30.77  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.61/30.77  # User time                : 0.315 s
% 6.61/30.77  # System time              : 0.035 s
% 6.61/30.77  # Total time               : 0.350 s
% 6.61/30.77  # Maximum resident set size: 56532 pages
% 6.61/30.77  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 6.61/30.77  
% 6.61/30.77  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 6.61/30.77  # OLD status Res
% 6.61/30.77  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 6.61/30.77  # Preprocessing time       : 0.455 s
% 6.61/30.77  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_48e494e00e0717ec2eabf59b73b2d711334607de for 23 seconds:
% 6.61/30.77  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,03,20000,1.0)
% 6.61/30.77  # Preprocessing time       : 0.402 s
% 6.61/30.77  
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof found!
% 6.61/30.77  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.61/30.77  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object total steps             : 40
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object clause steps            : 22
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object formula steps           : 18
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 13
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 12
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object generating inferences   : 8
% 6.61/30.77  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 12
% 6.61/30.77  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.61/30.77  # Parsed axioms                        : 37987
% 6.61/30.77  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 37770
% 6.61/30.77  # Initial clauses                      : 263
% 6.61/30.77  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 6.61/30.77  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 259
% 6.61/30.77  # Processed clauses                    : 604
% 6.61/30.77  # ...of these trivial                  : 115
% 6.61/30.77  # ...subsumed                          : 14
% 6.61/30.77  # ...remaining for further processing  : 475
% 6.61/30.77  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 6.61/30.77  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 6.61/30.77  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 6.61/30.77  # Generated clauses                    : 861
% 6.61/30.77  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 741
% 6.61/30.77  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 50
% 6.61/30.77  # Paramodulations                      : 857
% 6.61/30.77  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 6.61/30.77  # Current number of processed clauses  : 468
% 6.61/30.77  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 143
% 6.61/30.77  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.61/30.77  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 6.61/30.77  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 321
% 6.61/30.77  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 388
% 6.61/30.77  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1496
% 6.61/30.77  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 6.61/30.77  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10169
% 6.61/30.77  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5316
% 6.61/30.77  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 69
% 6.61/30.77  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 650
% 6.61/30.77  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 6.61/30.77  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 6.61/30.77  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.61/30.77  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 269028
% 6.61/30.77  
% 6.61/30.77  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.61/30.77  # User time                : 0.398 s
% 6.61/30.77  # System time              : 0.026 s
% 6.61/30.77  # Total time               : 0.424 s
% 6.61/30.77  # Maximum resident set size: 57304 pages
% 6.61/52.67  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.61/52.69  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.61/52.71  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.71  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.71  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.71  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.72  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.72  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.72  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.72  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.72  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.72  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.73  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.73  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.73  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.73  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.73  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 6.61/52.73  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.73  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.74  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.inCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.75  
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.75  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.76  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.77  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.77  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.77  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.77  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.77  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.77  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.78  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.78  eprover: No such file or directory
% 6.61/52.78  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 6.61/52.78  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------