%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR104+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 40.90s 8.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 40.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 19 unt; 0 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 0 equ; 44 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1484,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__during(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_1484) ).
cnf(i_0_4636,plain,
s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_4636) ).
cnf(i_0_4634,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_4634) ).
cnf(i_0_4633,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_4633) ).
cnf(i_0_1742,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_1742) ).
cnf(i_0_1477,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_1477) ).
cnf(i_0_1475,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_1475) ).
cnf(i_0_1476,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_1476) ).
cnf(i_0_4637,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_4637) ).
cnf(i_0_4635,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_4635) ).
cnf(i_0_1635,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_1635) ).
cnf(i_0_1636,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_1636) ).
cnf(i_0_4632,plain,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zpxbtv6w/input.p',i_0_4632) ).
cnf(c_0_4651,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__during(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval) ),
i_0_1484 ).
cnf(c_0_4652,plain,
s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
i_0_4636 ).
cnf(c_0_4653,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
i_0_4634 ).
cnf(c_0_4654,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
i_0_4633 ).
cnf(c_0_4655,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
i_0_1742 ).
cnf(c_0_4656,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4651,c_0_4652]),c_0_4653])]),c_0_4654])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4657,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
i_0_1477 ).
cnf(c_0_4658,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1475 ).
cnf(c_0_4659,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1476 ).
cnf(c_0_4660,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
i_0_4637 ).
cnf(c_0_4661,plain,
( s__temporalPart(X1,s__TimeInterval35_2)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__TimeInterval35_1)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4655,c_0_4656]) ).
cnf(c_0_4662,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
i_0_4635 ).
cnf(c_0_4663,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4657,c_0_4658]),c_0_4659]) ).
cnf(c_0_4664,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
i_0_1635 ).
cnf(c_0_4665,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4660,c_0_4661]),c_0_4662])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4666,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4663,c_0_4664]) ).
cnf(c_0_4667,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4665,c_0_4666]),c_0_4653])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4668,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
i_0_1636 ).
cnf(c_0_4669,plain,
~ s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4667,c_0_4666]),c_0_4654])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4670,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePoint) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4663,c_0_4668]) ).
cnf(c_0_4671,plain,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
i_0_4632 ).
cnf(c_0_4672,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4669,c_0_4670]),c_0_4671])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR104+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 23:52:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.68/1.89 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.68/1.89 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 1.68/1.89 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 1.68/1.89 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 40.90/8.84 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 40.90/8.84 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 40.90/8.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.149 s
% 40.90/8.84
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof found!
% 40.90/8.84 # SZS status Theorem
% 40.90/8.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object total steps : 35
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object clause steps : 22
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object initial formulas used : 13
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object generating inferences : 8
% 40.90/8.84 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 14
% 40.90/8.84 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 40.90/8.84 # Parsed axioms : 4518
% 40.90/8.84 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 40.90/8.84 # Initial clauses : 4518
% 40.90/8.84 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 40.90/8.84 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4518
% 40.90/8.84 # Processed clauses : 6063
% 40.90/8.84 # ...of these trivial : 222
% 40.90/8.84 # ...subsumed : 217
% 40.90/8.84 # ...remaining for further processing : 5624
% 40.90/8.84 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 105
% 40.90/8.84 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 40.90/8.84 # Backward-subsumed : 11
% 40.90/8.84 # Backward-rewritten : 333
% 40.90/8.84 # Generated clauses : 177784
% 40.90/8.84 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 176788
% 40.90/8.84 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 619
% 40.90/8.84 # Paramodulations : 177627
% 40.90/8.84 # Factorizations : 1
% 40.90/8.84 # Equation resolutions : 156
% 40.90/8.84 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 40.90/8.84 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 40.90/8.84 # Current number of processed clauses : 5276
% 40.90/8.84 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2006
% 40.90/8.84 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 40.90/8.84 # Negative unit clauses : 22
% 40.90/8.84 # Non-unit-clauses : 3248
% 40.90/8.84 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 144159
% 40.90/8.84 # ...number of literals in the above : 779531
% 40.90/8.84 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 40.90/8.84 # Current number of archived clauses : 344
% 40.90/8.84 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3754467
% 40.90/8.84 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 216436
% 40.90/8.84 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 845
% 40.90/8.84 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 300379
% 40.90/8.84 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 40.90/8.84 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1070
% 40.90/8.84 # BW rewrite match successes : 198
% 40.90/8.84 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 40.90/8.84 # Condensation successes : 0
% 40.90/8.84 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3781080
% 40.90/8.84
% 40.90/8.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 40.90/8.84 # User time : 3.748 s
% 40.90/8.84 # System time : 0.132 s
% 40.90/8.84 # Total time : 3.880 s
% 40.90/8.84 # ...preprocessing : 0.149 s
% 40.90/8.84 # ...main loop : 3.731 s
% 40.90/8.84 # Maximum resident set size: 200796 pages
% 40.90/8.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------