%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR104+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:54 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.33s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 41 ( 23 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 92 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 93 ( 42 ~; 36 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 2 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_27,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8] :
( ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X8,X6)
& s__subclass(X6,X7) )
=> s__instance(X8,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_27) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_26,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( s__subclass(X6,X7)
=> ( s__instance(X7,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_26) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_912,axiom,
s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_912) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_1262,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X105] :
( ( s__instance(X4,s__TimePosition)
& s__instance(X5,s__TimePosition)
& s__instance(X105,s__TimePosition) )
=> ( ( s__temporalPart(X5,X105)
& s__temporalPart(X4,X5) )
=> s__temporalPart(X4,X105) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_1262) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_74,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( ( s__instance(X15,s__TimeInterval)
& s__instance(X16,s__TimeInterval) )
=> ( s__during(X15,X16)
=> s__temporalPart(X15,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_74) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).
fof(local_5,axiom,
s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_5) ).
fof(local_2,axiom,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_908,axiom,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_908) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X669,X670,X671] :
( s__instance(X671,X670)
| ~ s__instance(X671,X669)
| ~ s__subclass(X669,X670)
| ~ s__instance(X669,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X670,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X667,X668] :
( ( ~ s__subclass(X667,X668)
| s__instance(X668,s__SetOrClass) )
& ( ~ s__subclass(X667,X668)
| s__instance(X667,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_26])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X2,X1)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__subclass(X1,X2)
| s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimePoint,s__TimePosition),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_912]) ).
fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X594,X595,X596] :
( s__temporalPart(X594,X596)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X595,X596)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X594,X595)
| ~ s__instance(X594,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X595,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X596,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_1262])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePoint)
| s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePoint),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X647,X648] :
( s__temporalPart(X647,X648)
| ~ s__during(X647,X648)
| ~ s__instance(X647,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__instance(X648,s__TimeInterval) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_74])])]) ).
fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ s__temporalPart(X2,X1)
| ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| s__temporalPart(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
s__instance(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimePosition),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ s__during(X2,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimeInterval)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| s__temporalPart(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
s__during(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimeInterval),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,X1)
| s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
s__temporalPart(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_908]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_2,s__TimePosition)
| ~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval)
| s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
~ s__instance(s__TimeInterval35_1,s__TimePosition),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_38]),c_0_30])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR104+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:59:43 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/0.69 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.33/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % new_bool_1 with pid 2037365 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.33/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.33/0.69 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.33/0.69 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.69 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2037377 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.33/0.69 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.69 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.33/0.69 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.33/0.69 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.69 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/0.69 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.69 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.33/0.69
% 0.33/0.69 % Proof found!
% 0.33/0.69 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.33/0.69 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/0.69 % Parsed axioms : 7223
% 0.33/0.69 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7140
% 0.33/0.69 % Initial clauses : 101
% 0.33/0.69 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.33/0.69 % Initial clauses in saturation : 97
% 0.33/0.69 % Processed clauses : 152
% 0.33/0.69 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.33/0.69 % ...subsumed : 20
% 0.33/0.69 % ...remaining for further processing : 131
% 0.33/0.69 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.33/0.69 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.33/0.69 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.33/0.69 % Generated clauses : 163
% 0.33/0.69 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 89
% 0.33/0.69 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 14
% 0.33/0.69 % Paramodulations : 159
% 0.33/0.69 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % NegExts : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.33/0.69 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.33/0.69 % ...of those cached : 14
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.69 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.69 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.69 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.69 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.69 % Current number of processed clauses : 123
% 0.33/0.69 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.33/0.69 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.33/0.69 % Non-unit-clauses : 98
% 0.33/0.69 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34
% 0.33/0.69 % ...number of literals in the above : 226
% 0.33/0.69 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/0.69 % Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.33/0.69 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1109
% 0.33/0.69 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 445
% 0.33/0.69 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 35
% 0.33/0.69 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69
% 0.33/0.70 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/0.70 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.33/0.70 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.33/0.70 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/0.70 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/0.70 % Termbank termtop insertions : 89490
% 0.33/0.70 % Search garbage collected termcells : 40224
% 0.33/0.70
% 0.33/0.70 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.70 % User time : 0.057 s
% 0.33/0.70 % System time : 0.030 s
% 0.33/0.70 % Total time : 0.087 s
% 0.33/0.70 % Maximum resident set size: 18736 pages
% 0.33/0.70
% 0.33/0.70 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.70 % User time : 0.222 s
% 0.33/0.70 % System time : 0.050 s
% 0.33/0.70 % Total time : 0.272 s
% 0.33/0.70 % Maximum resident set size: 12288 pages
% 0.33/0.70 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------