↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR104+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.96s 3.23s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   1 sgn   1   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ? [X2341] : s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X2341),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(local_4,axiom,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_4) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X2341] : s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X2341),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2342] : ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X2342),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,s__TimeInterval35_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__TimePoint35_1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR104+7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:59:58 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.96/3.23  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.96/3.23  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.96/3.23  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % new_bool_1 with pid 2038308 completed with status 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 3.96/3.23  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.96/3.23  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 3.96/3.23  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 3.96/3.23  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 3.96/3.23  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 3.96/3.23  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2038310 completed with status 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 3.96/3.23  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 3.96/3.23  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1490s (5) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 3.96/3.23  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 3.96/3.23  % Search class: FGHSS-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 3.96/3.23  % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 3.96/3.23  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 3.96/3.23  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 3.96/3.23  % Preprocessing time       : 0.041 s
% 3.96/3.23  
% 3.96/3.23  % Proof found!
% 3.96/3.23  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.96/3.23  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.96/3.23  % Parsed axioms                        : 55592
% 3.96/3.23  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55419
% 3.96/3.23  % Initial clauses                      : 221
% 3.96/3.23  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 3.96/3.23  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 213
% 3.96/3.23  % Processed clauses                    : 27
% 3.96/3.23  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % ...remaining for further processing  : 27
% 3.96/3.23  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Generated clauses                    : 1
% 3.96/3.23  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.96/3.23  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.96/3.23  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.96/3.23  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.96/3.23  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.96/3.23  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.96/3.23  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.96/3.23  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.96/3.23  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.96/3.23  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.96/3.23  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.96/3.23  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.96/3.23  % Current number of processed clauses  : 26
% 3.96/3.23  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 3.96/3.23  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.96/3.23  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 3.96/3.23  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 186
% 3.96/3.23  % ...number of literals in the above   : 853
% 3.96/3.23  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 3.96/3.23  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.96/3.23  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 668271
% 3.96/3.23  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 293658
% 3.96/3.23  
% 3.96/3.23  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.96/3.23  % User time                : 0.313 s
% 3.96/3.23  % System time              : 0.171 s
% 3.96/3.23  % Total time               : 0.485 s
% 3.96/3.23  % Maximum resident set size: 136760 pages
% 3.96/3.23  
% 3.96/3.23  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.96/3.23  % User time                : 2.432 s
% 3.96/3.23  % System time              : 0.287 s
% 3.96/3.23  % Total time               : 2.719 s
% 3.96/3.23  % Maximum resident set size: 63232 pages
% 3.96/3.23  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------